Posted on 11/18/2016 2:34:22 PM PST by springwater13
President-Elect Trump just posted an online survey for help prioritizing his first 100 days in office.
(Excerpt) Read more at action.trump2016.com ...
While I agree with you somewhat, I think they are trying to gauge current thought on those things. Did they read the public right? Do we still want all those things?
That looks like a big list, but Trump will delegate each one out. It’s not that big a deal.
This guy is a multi-tasker CEO extraordinaire.
FREEP IT!!!!
FREEP IT HARD BABY!
Energy Jobs, Energy Jobs, Energy Jobs which will result in MAGA.
I had 2 thirds as 1’s and 1 third as 2’s. The problem is time to get through congress for some really important issues like the new scotus justice
Or, a respondent can be judicious in voting—and get the same message across.
Unseal his ID!
I agree. I voted highly if I heard Trump say it over and over again, like the wall. If I thought it was a good idea I put it at somewhat important. If I thought it was just republican lobbyists adding to Trumps agenda like most of the energy ideas, I said not important. But for those energy things like putting the coal miners back to work I think its highly important. If Trump ran on it, I want him to do it first.
I actually would like him to fix the drinking water in Flint as well. That would go a long way to getting Michigan to stay in the republican party. And to prove to some black voters they have been wrong all these years.
Funny. That's not on the list. Hmmmm.
Change the law so that Democrats are no longer allowed to itemize deductions. They have to take the standard deduction.. Only choice.
It can be done in 8 years.
Nor do I.
He leaves the reservation at times, and I believe this is one of them.
He has been pretty sharp over the last week though.
Carson is about the only one that really helped Trump at all.
I wouldn’t mind seeing him given a token appointment, but the guy is too low key for a more visible position.
I agree that debt reduction should be important, but there is no political advantage to reduce it. You just give a future dem a bigger slush fund later on. It sucks, but we are in a death spiral on tbis and anyone who tries to stop it will be politically destroyed.
Infrastructure should be a state and local matter. There’s no such thing as “national infrastructure.” For example, Pittsburgh has more bridges than Venice, more than many states combined. Why should non-Pittsburghers pay for it?
An example would be delete EPA, and no environmental regulations except major smokestack belching pollution. No more lives destroyed by the EPA for wetlands and other nonsense. Let's get some common sense back into government.
Oh, and lets do away with all the SWAT teams that all the agencies have. Why do the EPA and IRS have a SWAT team? I can see the FBI but delete the others. If they need SWAT, they can 'borrow' the FBI's super trained SWAT team. Enough of government duplication.
filled out and sent it in
LOL! You keyed in what is truly important!
Are you writing that book?
Don’t make me come over there!
The entire list is fabulous, except it’s a fundraising scheme, not an actual survey, but it was still fun to take.
1. Build the wall
2. Build the wall
3. Build the wall
4. If you have any bricks left over, build a new supermax and lock her up
Corrected my tagline........
1) Build The Wall.
2) Lock Her Up.
3) Repeal 0bamaCare.
3) Fire Political Appointees.
4) Appoint a Conservative Supreme Court Justice.
5) Etc.
He’s going to listen to the people?
Holy Moly!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.