Posted on 11/12/2016 7:00:49 AM PST by Nicojones
Now that the dust has settled, Trump is projected to win 306 electoral votes against Hillary’s 232 (according to Wikipedia). SOUNDS LIKE A LANDSLIDE TO ME!
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
Regarding Popular Vote #’s:
What was one of jugears attempts at a demeaning put down of Trump? A bunch of whining about how the presidency isn’t a popularity contest and it’s no place for a reality TV personality.
If some you Freepers remember I predicted when DJT & wife, Melania came down the escalator in Trump Tower as DJT announced his POTUS run, I clearly predicted he would win in a massive landslide victory, He did!!! With everyone, Obama, Clinton, Biden, Kaine, Pelosi, Reid, etc,...the Media, the celebrities, the TV comics, all the riff-raff, low life liberal vermin and educators, the Rupublican Establishement vermin, DJT performed a massive, miracle feat....he destroyed all of them politically, in one fell swoop. Braco....Donald J. Trump!!!
Just as predicted!
That’s exactly why I though Trump was raving about a rigged system. It was rigged and Trump won it all in spite of their rigging.
I bet they had them but it would have had to have been a statistically abnormal amount of “last minute votes coming in for one candidate” - it gets to the point of being obvious fraud and wouldn’t have been taken seriously. They would have exposed themselves and also jeopardize being able to slant any future election. I believe there’s fraud but it has to be played smart, otherwise it fails, jail being a significant risk.
Dude, it’s a POLL. Pollsters do not call every likely voter in America when they take a poll of likely voters. Typically the take the opinions of about 1000-1500 people and from there extrapolate and come to a consensus for the rest of the likely voters.
I would guess that in NV they did manufacture enough, and in NH, who knows about walk-up registration.
Are we sure this time? No take backs?
Plot Twist: CNN Now Saying That Donald Trump Will Win The Popular Vote; UPDATE: CNN Admits Design Flaw
CNN is now projecting that when all ballots are counted, Donald Trump will win the popular vote. Currently, Clinton is ahead by about 300,000 votes.
CNN projecting that Donald Trump will be the winner of the popular vote as well when 100% of ballots are counted https://t.co/WBDK4pQik0pic.twitter.com/XbScvq7SsK
— Joe Perticone (@JoePerticone) November 10, 2016
______________________________________________
Note that California alone provides a + 2,708,893 popular vote difference in favor of Clinton. Remove that, and without additional tallies Trumps wins the total popular vote in 49 states.
Maybe yet another reason to consider breaking up Cali into smaller states.
________________________________
from California Secretary of State (today)
Hillary Clinton
(Party: DEM)
5,860,714·····61.6%
Donald J. Trump
(Party: REP, AI)
3,151,821·····33.1%
see my #110 re Cali popular vote
I would dispute the absentees being mostly Republican. Double voting college kids and snowbirds make up a big part of absentee votes , especially in the upper Midwest and Northeast.
He beat her by 25 percentage points when figured from the most advantageous way for her and 31 Percentage points when figured the other way (Using 306 at the 100% basis vs. using 232 as the 100% basis: 23200 divided by 306 or 30600 divided by 232). Avalanche tsunami!
"How Donald Trump turned the tide in Michigan"
story is only an hour old...
The Bay and Saginaw counties where my extended family lives and Macomb county where I live all broke for Trump in a big way.
Feeling pretty damn good after reading that.
I wish this were true, but don’t see any evidence yet that Michigan was “called” for trump.
First, Michigan SoS website numbers have not changed since two days ago:
http://miboecfr.nictusa.com/election/results/2016GEN_CENR.html
Second, investmentwatchblog is a zippy-do-dah zero website, no other source on the internet reports this, using all the different search engines to find anything.
The original article refers to this Detroit radio station as their source, but THAT story is datelined THREE days ago:
AND THAT story self-refers to ANOTHER story from the same radio station from THREE days ago that make the UNOFFICIAL claim that Trump won Michigan.
I call bullshit on the original post. I would happily be proved wrong with authoritative information.
Btw, all the political experts, talk show hacks masquerading as non-establishment heroes, career politicians, media, pundits and D.C. insiders all got it all 100% wrong.
So welcome to the tiny group of individuals who had the foresight and perception and understood the mood of the people, and knew it was going to be Trump in a blowout.
This greatly reduces worries about a “faithless elector” situation, where several GOPE-appointed electors cast their ballots for Hillary.
Do you think trump publicizing the fraud issue brought some extra scrutiny and put some thugs on notice?
There seems to be a decided lack of vote challenge lawsuits by lawyer ridden democrats
I am not Eddie, but I think this, combined with the FBI investigation in Philadelphia into the state’s most powerful union and other corruption, as well as the wikileaks (they still don’t know what else is coming) put a big shadow over those who cheat or would cheat.
Trump has 4 years to root out the corruption in precincts in the inner-cities and we all know the ones where it is most common. If he goes to sleep on the topic and nothing further is done it will come back. There are some select cities where they will do it if they can get away with it.
It wasn’t 12 million illegals that voted, probably slightly north of one million, plus another1/4 million fraudulent votes around the country in urban centers...plus another few hundred thousand suppressed Republican votes in places like Broward County.
Trump probably had about 2 million more legal votes than Hillary in total. But all properly tolled, he might have won maybe two more states (Minnesota and New Hampshire, I doubt he could have carried Virginia).
We need in the next four years to clean up American elections. Use the majority to require voter ID and strict verification - that won’t solve everything, but it will take care of 80 percent of the problem.
I’ve not heard this reported .... is this “official” official?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.