Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Trump/Pence 2016!
1 posted on 11/06/2016 6:35:28 AM PST by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mandaladon

Come on TRUMP!


2 posted on 11/06/2016 6:36:59 AM PST by hoosiermama (“Christian faith is not the past but the present and the future. Make it stronger. "DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

wow...that is very lopsided!

go Trump!


3 posted on 11/06/2016 6:37:06 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


             

4 posted on 11/06/2016 6:39:28 AM PST by tomkat (MONSTER ! VOTE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

VICTORY INCOMING


5 posted on 11/06/2016 6:40:00 AM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

The gap between Trump and Hillary has been growing slowly day by day. This is great news. Only two days to go till we know the results.


7 posted on 11/06/2016 6:43:51 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

If that is accurate, is it possible to lose the electoral map?


8 posted on 11/06/2016 6:44:34 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

This seems to be following a Big MO shift reminiscent of 1980.

Then, the insiders saw the shift by Saturday and saw the writing on the wall by Sunday. By Monday, even the candidates knew how it was going to turn out. They just had to wait for the finale Tuesday evening.


9 posted on 11/06/2016 6:44:34 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Is this a weighted or unweighted poll?

I’m curious. I know it uses a large number of calls—something like 3000. If your call sample is large enough, you shouldn’t have to cook the results for predicted poll representation (absent some other systematic polling error).

In that case, it could be the most accurate of polls.


11 posted on 11/06/2016 6:44:56 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Go Trojans!


12 posted on 11/06/2016 6:44:57 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

The other polls are bogus. Stuart Varney just caught the head of See-BS conspiring with the Hillary Headquarters on questions to ask Jebber in an interview. The damn Bush Bastards are conspiring with Hillary to ruin America!!!


16 posted on 11/06/2016 6:48:27 AM PST by ZULU (We are freedom's safest place!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

The other polls are bogus. Stuart Varney just caught the head of See-BS conspiring with the Hillary Headquarters on questions to ask Jebber in an interview. The damn Bush Bastards are conspiring with Hillary to ruin America!!!


17 posted on 11/06/2016 6:48:29 AM PST by ZULU (We are freedom's safest place!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93; Sun; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; randita; StoneWall Brigade; ...

Iowa Congessional Polls

IA CD-3 (Loras): David Young (R) 44%, Jim Mowrer (D) 39%

IA CD-1 (Loras): Rod Blum (R) 47%, Monica Vernon (D) 41%

GOP still ahead, establishment GOP Young in swing seat, conservative Blum in dem leaning seat.

This same pollster has Trump DOWN 1 in Iowa, kinda leads to conclude these seats aren’t in danger.

‘Nother Iowa Poll

P2016 IA (Des Moines Register): Trump 46%, Clinton 39%, Johnson 6%, Stein 1%

CO USSEN (Gravis/Breitbart): Michael Bennet (D) 47%, Darryl Glenn (R) 44%

This race has closed, major.

NY Congressional Polls

NY CD-1 (Siena): Lee Zeldin (R) 51%, Anna Throne-Holst (D) 38%

NY CD-3 (Siena): Tom Suozzi (D) 47%, Jack Martins (R) 40%

NY CD-19 (Siena): John Faso (R) 48%, Zephyr Teachout (D) 42%

Teachout is the nut who ran against Cumomo in the rat gov primary.

NY CD-22 (Siena): Claudia Tenney (R) 38%, Kim Myers (D) 34%, Martin Babinec (Ref) 16%


26 posted on 11/06/2016 7:00:45 AM PST by Impy (Never Shillery, Never Schumer, Never Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
Don't be too shocked upon waking Wed morning to find the RATS challenging every state they can. Even a landslide win by the Trumpster will not go down easily as the RATS scurry off to their favorite "fixing venue", the Courts. Never forget Al Franken's stolen victory in 2008.

EXCLUSIVE: Virginia Gov. Pardons 60,000 Felons, Enough To Swing Election

When 1,099 Felons Vote In A Race Won By 312 Ballots


33 posted on 11/06/2016 7:20:59 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

At this point it is safe to assume that Trump is 50+ and Hillary is under 40!


34 posted on 11/06/2016 7:23:36 AM PST by GilGil (E. Deplorabus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

If this poll is right as it was in 2012 then its going to be a good night Nov 8th. The good trends I see is that Trump is closing the hispanic gap and the woman gap while surging higher with men. Those criticizing this poll don’t understand the science of polling. The important thing is having representative samples of the electorate. It doesn’t matter if you constantly change the members of the sample or not. Polls in the wild have big problems. Its increasingly hard to get respondents and its easy to get very skewed samples on occasion plus when you throw in human interviews and push poll questions as nearly all the major network polls do you tend to inject bias into the poll. The LaTimes poll isn’t like polls in the wild because it isn’t calling random people unannounced interrupting their lives and it has a population of nearly 3000 respondents.

Now the critics could argue that the sample is wrong and it could very well be and the weighting could be wrong but we won’t know that till election day. Last time this methodology worked very well and did a far better job of predicting Obama’s margin of victory.

https://alpdata.rand.org/?page=election2012#election-forecast


40 posted on 11/06/2016 8:04:47 AM PST by Maelstorm (Free is just another word for someone else has to pay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Check out the Trump surge with the Latino vote!
Trump may be winning the latio vote by Monday.


41 posted on 11/06/2016 8:05:33 AM PST by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

This is great news! Also, Trump leads by 1 in the IBD/TIPP poll. The momentum is clearly with The Donald. Of course, neither of these polls will be mentioned by the Liberal Media (including Murdoch News).


57 posted on 11/06/2016 10:22:40 AM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson