Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crudele: Hillary won't survive another WikiLeaks dump (next release will make her "unelectable")
NY Post ^ | November 2, 2016 | John Crudele

Posted on 11/02/2016 10:20:15 PM PDT by Zakeet

I said it a long time ago and I will say it again that I think that Hillary Clinton will be unelectable by Election Day.

[Snip]

The Democrats made a big mistake when they picked Clinton as their candidate, because too many people knew too much about her.

FBI Director James Comey did the Democrats - not the Republicans - a big disservice last summer by not coming down harder on Clinton.

If Comey had brought down the hammer, the Dems could have switched candidates.

[Snip]

If I had to guess, the newest releases will contain Hillary Clinton’s personal stuff. Unless WikiLeaks is lying, Phase 3 should come before the weekend. Only then will Clinton be unelectable.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; crudele; emails; hillary; hillaryclinton; scandal; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: IncPen
Perfect.
21 posted on 11/02/2016 10:38:35 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
I still think there is something very odd about those huge, boxy, stiff tunics she wears. That is more than just covering up a big butt and thighs.

All the Romulan women dress like that.

22 posted on 11/02/2016 10:38:59 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

LOL! I love it!

Sad that it’s accurate though...


23 posted on 11/02/2016 10:39:51 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Sad state of this country that she’s still has a solid shot to win the election.


24 posted on 11/02/2016 10:40:08 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Since when has criminality ever stopped them from voting for their candidates?

Honestly?


25 posted on 11/02/2016 10:40:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: b4me
Maybe Russia is one of the 5 countries who hacked her server, but I don’t see them as the source of wikileaks emails.

The Russians probably have them, and if they do, it would be more valuable to let Hillary win, and then use the emails against her.

26 posted on 11/02/2016 10:41:55 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
FBI Director James Comey did the Democrats - not the Republicans - a big disservice last summer by not coming down harder on Clinton.

This is true.

On July 5, the Democrat convention was still in the future. There were 712 unbound superdelegates.

If they had handed it to Bernie, a large part of the base would have been ecstatic, and the rest would have been relieved.

Now it's popcorn time!

27 posted on 11/02/2016 10:43:13 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Look what happened in NC......

http://www.fayobserver.com/news/crime_courts/break-in-caught-on-tape-at-cumberland-county-early-voting/article_735695f6-2042-586b-a6f9-cf2dbfd6c4ed.html


28 posted on 11/02/2016 10:43:44 PM PDT by vinny29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4me

Keep you antenna tuned to the “Lolita Express” and the Qatar-Turkey pipeline, which is designed to destroy Putin. The US started and is funding the war in Syria so a bunch of fat cats (read Clintons) can get rich by blocking natural gas from Russia. The whole refugee disaster is a result of a US started war for money.


29 posted on 11/02/2016 10:43:49 PM PDT by Cololeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The big black dude may be the Democrats safety valve at this point. With every thing coming out they may sacrifice Hillary to stop the flood of info. If she was gone they would say there is no longer any need to pursue the investigation.


30 posted on 11/02/2016 10:44:27 PM PDT by Kadric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I ammstill,waiting for the dump that makes her unelectable, that just blows her out,of the water.

If it exists i want the video of bill screwing the teenager on orgy island released.

If it existsmi want the pics the nypd says are on the laptop of hillary and huma having sex witha teenage girl, released.

I want the things that supposedly exist that can nuke her for good, to be put out there, and actually NUKE her, for good.


31 posted on 11/02/2016 10:45:40 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

I’m thinking there will be another Wikileaks so...


32 posted on 11/02/2016 10:46:33 PM PDT by pnz1 (#IMNOTWITHHER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc

“This is a mind-blowingly awesome election. We finally get the truth, and it has to come from an internationally wanted hacker. Our media is so worthless and craven, it couldn’t have happened any other way.”

Actually it seems to me that the biggest factor is patriots in the FBI and NYPD who realized that Hilliary is definitely an out-and-out felon and unfit to be President. I am very grateful!


33 posted on 11/02/2016 10:48:35 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Trump/Pence 2016! Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The Democrats should have nominated someone else. Ultimately Hillary and her acolytes were able to strong arm most other candidates out of the running. And in many ways the most viable alternatives came up in the Clinton machine so they could not/would not oppose her. Bernie knew he had small odds to win but wanted to push her left so she would make campaign promises and also to motivate down ballot votes from the left and to the leftward candidates. O’Malley also knew had virtually nil chance but needed visibility for 2016-2020 (plus you never know what could happen to the leading candidates as Hillary said about Bobby Kennedy).

The real problem for me is the stranglehold Clinton has on the party. She stacked the deck deep in her favor. DNC was run by Clintonites. And the Super Delegates have a lot of power in their party. The SDs act like junior congressmen - they vote for who they are told to vote for. And the Dem party is fueled by Clinton campaign cash. No other candidate was raising money for the party like she was. So the SDs had to vote for her or risk retribution from the party - no committee assignments in congress, no campaign help from the party, no help getting big names to campaign for them and raise money for them. The party is run on cash and the Clinton machine syphoned all the cash from big donors. Bernie got his financing from the voters not the rich people in Hollywood and Wall Street.

The SDs make up about 15% of the nominating votes in their party. But in a 2-person race that makes 30% of the votes you need to win the nomination. Add in the proportional representation rule where there are no winner-take-all states, the person with the support of the SDs can come in 2nd place or even 3rd place in every state and still win the nomination. Politically that would be a problem but mathematically, with the near unanimous support of the SDs she was virtually guaranteed the nomination. Bernie and O’Malley (and the few others) would have had to keep her under 30% in every state for her to lose the race. She was mathematically guaranteed the nomination by the rules and the SD support.

The SDs had the chance to challenge her. They chose to support her knowing all they knew. This is a big problem in my view. It says to me either the party is afraid of the Clintons, or way too beholden to them, or inept without them. None of those answers is good for their party or the country. If she were to win, and had the party leaders in her pocket by hook or by crook, she would be an extremely potent executive. If the Dems also took Congress it would be trouble - look at what just 2 years of Obama+Dem congress brought us. And the party was not afraid of Obama though he could raise a lot of cash.


34 posted on 11/02/2016 10:48:53 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

The more I look into this corruption, the deeper the rabbit hole goes. It has become obvious that HiLIARy will do absolutely anything to absolutely anybody in the pursuit of money and power. War with Russia is just a bump in the road as far as she is concerned.

The number of corrupt ventures she is involved in is just mind-boggling.


35 posted on 11/02/2016 10:49:57 PM PDT by Cololeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
The Russians probably have them, and if they do, it would be more valuable to let Hillary win, and then use the emails against her.

There is really no doubt that the Russians have them and they have been holding on to them to use against Hillary if she were elected... The Russian's haven't been leaking this stuff to Wikileaks; it was too valuable. If Huma backed up everything on her husband's computer... it all loses its value and a number of parties could release the stuff. It is all imploding right now.

36 posted on 11/02/2016 10:50:17 PM PDT by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc
We finally get the truth, and it has to come from an internationally wanted hacker.

Julian Assange isn't a hacker. He isn't even a whistle blower. He and his outfit, Wikileaks, are merely the conduit through which whistle blowers and hackers can get their releases widely publicized.

If you ask me, the sex related charges against him were cooked up by people who were angry about the dirt he dumped on them. Nothing more.

37 posted on 11/02/2016 10:50:38 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cololeo

The whole of the Western World got behind it. This madness seems to have begun at Kosovo. Long before Obama. At least that’s when something was obviously wrong.

The Lewinsky affair was in full swing.


38 posted on 11/02/2016 10:51:01 PM PDT by fire and forget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc

Comey timed the Oct. 29th revelation perfectly. That way Hillary will be both guilty and defeated. Just a simple one-page letter from Comey changed everything for the better, such as Trump’s chances, the media’s downfall and the patriotic American’s hopes for our country. Each day I am blown away at Comey’s brave action and how it really changed everything for the better.


39 posted on 11/02/2016 10:51:37 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-94))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cololeo

” The whole refugee disaster is a result of a US started war for money.”

that much I had heard. I just wondered if she purposely let Russia have access to info on the USA (and her yoga LOL) just as she purposely let Russia donate to her to gain control of US uranium?


40 posted on 11/02/2016 10:51:56 PM PDT by b4me (Idolatry is rampant in thoughts and actions. Choose whom you will serve....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson