Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid accuses Comey of sitting on proof of Trump-Russia ties, possible Hatch Act violation
CBS ^ | October 30, 2016 | Reena Flores

Posted on 10/30/2016 9:17:56 PM PDT by Pinkbell

In his last few months in the Senate, Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, isn’t pulling any punches -- especially after the recent revelations by FBI Director James Comey that more emails were found that could be related to the Clinton email probe.

The pugilistic Reid, who plans retire after finishing out this term in Congress, penned a blistering letter to Comey Sunday, accusing the FBI chief of holding back “explosive” information about Donald Trump’s close Russian ties while possibly violating the Hatch Act by reviving the Clinton email investigation.

“Your actions in recent months have demonstrated a disturbing double standard for the treatment of sensitive information, with what appears to be a clear intent to aid one political party over another,” Reid wrote, adding that through Comey’s “partisan actions, you may have broken the law.”

The Nevada Democrat went on to insinuate Comey’s violation of the Hatch Act, which prohibits “activity directed towards the success or failure” of a candidate by executive branch employees.

“[Y]our highly selective approach to publicizing information, along with your timing, was intended for the success or failure of a partisan candidate or political group,” Reid wrote.

One example Reid posited of the “selective approach”: Comey’s methods in investigating Donald Trump and his campaign’s possible ties to the Russian government.

“In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government - a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity,” he said. “I wrote to you months ago calling for this information to be released to the public...and yet, you continue to resist calls to inform the public of this critical information.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: comeyfbiletter; dingyharry; harryreid; hatchact; hillary; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Trump20162020

Strong Russian ties wpuld be fine with me. We have more common interests than reasons to go to war.


21 posted on 10/30/2016 9:35:47 PM PDT by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Who cares what that senile old buffoon thinks..I would gladly pay his brother to come and kick his ass again, I would videotape it and enjoy every second of it


22 posted on 10/30/2016 9:36:46 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

For a man who represents Nevada gambling he is playing this like a crap shoot. Pinky is throwing crap on the wall to see if any of it sticks.


23 posted on 10/30/2016 9:37:30 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
I'm really not sure what the procedure is; I would have to defer to someone with knowledge of how contested results are handled. But it would be a first step toward potentially nullifying a Trump victory. I hope it's all legit, I just look at who is squealing the loudest and ask, OK..what do they have to gain by this?
24 posted on 10/30/2016 9:40:19 PM PDT by JGT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Who’s in Putin’s Pocket — Clinton or Trump? (Clinton Uranium RussiaGate scandal)

The New American ^ | August 3, 2016 | William F. Jasper

"according to some calculations, the Uranium One deal, involving top Clinton donors Frank Guistra and Ian Telfer, has transferred as much as 50 percent of projected American uranium production to Kremlin control."

***********************************************

RUSSIAGATE

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission & $500,000 speaking fee (US uranium to Russia)

qura.com ^ | July 27, 2016 | Sierra Spaulding

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission and $500k speaking fee for brokering the sale of 20% of America's uranium deposits to Russia?

You are speaking about a really interesting deal that ended up giving Vladimir Putin and the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. ..."

25 posted on 10/30/2016 9:41:26 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Adding to post 1 the link to the Washington Post article cited regarding Harry Reid and his willingness to lie for political expediency:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/15/harry-reid-lied-about-mitt-romneys-taxes-hes-still-not-sorry/


26 posted on 10/30/2016 9:42:12 PM PDT by Pinkbell ((http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/10/questions-about-sexual-assault.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
From the campaign trail, 2008...

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. not win it]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090412030633/http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."
__________________________________________________________

From Investor's Business Daily, Jan 2012:

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow

Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 - linchpin of our missile defense - might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology. ..."

"In his signing statement, Obama said he would treat these legal restrictions as 'non-binding' and that 'my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 (sic) in a manner that does not interfere with the president's constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications.'

Betraying our secrets is easy for a president who betrayed allies Poland and the Czech Republic to placate Moscow.

Poland was to host ground-based interceptors such as those we've deployed in California and Alaska, with missile-tracking radar deployed in the Czech Republic.

Obama pulled the plug when Moscow objected. Never mind, he said, we have a better approach: a four-phase plan that calls for using three versions of the Navy's Standard SM-3 interceptor missile that forms the backbone of its Aegis missile-defense system.

The fourth phase consists of a missile still on the drawing board scheduled for deployment by 2020, a version of the SM-3 called the Block IIB. It would intercept hostile missiles in the "early intercept" phase before an enemy missile could release its warheads and decoys. The Russians want the SM-3's secrets, and Obama appears to be willing to turn them over.

The president wants to save the New Start Treaty, which the Russians have threatened to abandon if we try to fully implement President Reagan's dream of defeating a nuclear missile attack.

Russia has unilaterally asserted that any qualitative or quantitative improvement in U.S. missile defenses would be grounds for withdrawal from the treaty.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/010912-597158-obama-gives-russia-missile-defense-secrets.htm#ixzz3jXmMbVwY
___________________________________________________

March 2012...

"Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it's important for him to give me space."

Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ..."

Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility."

Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility." That statement tells us much about the president's mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration.

Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president's comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase "on all these issues," implying more is at stake than just missile defense."

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn't be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/
__________________________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

 photo Putin KGB - Thanks Obama 01_zpsnqylnyno.jpg


27 posted on 10/30/2016 9:42:27 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
 photo Wrong Way Obama - Football_zpsaexirdi5.jpg
___________________________________________________

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html
___________________________________________________

Re: The Obama-Putin Iran Deal...

Aug 2015

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

28 posted on 10/30/2016 9:43:29 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Dream on Dingy Harry.


29 posted on 10/30/2016 9:47:53 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Grampa, I loved the graphic but the size needed more formatting:

Start with this:

img height=400 smc=the image location

the height=400 controls the size of the image. Do a preview.

If it is too large use a number less than 400.

If it is too small, use a number larger than 400.

Do another preview to see if it looks like what you want.

If it is good, post.

30 posted on 10/30/2016 9:48:51 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

There will be no do overs. Hillary caused this mess when she decided to BleachBit the server and destroy the Smart Phones. She should have withdrew from the nomination when they found out she did.


31 posted on 10/30/2016 9:53:14 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Appreciate your links. I compiled some too with Clinton/Podesta ties to Russia. They are really projecting going after Trump.


32 posted on 10/30/2016 9:56:24 PM PDT by Pinkbell ((http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/10/questions-about-sexual-assault.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Senile old bastard.


33 posted on 10/30/2016 10:00:01 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Clintoon will be the "historical" first unindicted felon to sit in the Oval Office. Be proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Sen. Reid needs to be sued into penury.


34 posted on 10/30/2016 10:03:07 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
I just noticed that this was added to Wikipedia today:

“On October 30th, 2016, US Senate Democrat Minority Leader Harry Reid has stated that FBI Directory James Comey may have violated the Hatch Act by sending a letter to the Congress on October 28th, 2016”

35 posted on 10/30/2016 10:03:44 PM PDT by JGT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

So remember. If you ever plan a major heist, run for president and plan it inside of the final 60 days leading up to the election. The Feds can’t touch you.


36 posted on 10/30/2016 10:03:51 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Clintoon will be the "historical" first unindicted felon to sit in the Oval Office. Be proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Captain Harry “Yellow Stain” Queeg
Rolls his Chinese worry balls in his sweaty palm
Glances nervously at the treadmill


37 posted on 10/30/2016 10:10:17 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I made a formatting mistake: instead of smc, use src.


38 posted on 10/30/2016 10:34:58 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Reid is a real dirtbag, always throwing out lies and accusations. Shame on him.


39 posted on 10/30/2016 11:41:23 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Hey Harry! SIT ON THIS^^^^^^^!!!!


40 posted on 10/31/2016 12:28:13 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson