And I am sure that they will have no trouble finding a corrupt judge to go along. They always do.
“claiming that Trump’s argument is designed to suppress the vote in minority communities.”
—
Oh for crying out loud.
Nope.
There is no potential for that.
Just putting worth the “story” that Trump and the GOP are performing illegal activities. Nothing will come of this in terms of getting to a court of law. But that isn’t the point of this particular exercise. If Hillary truly believes she has this election in the bag, then this is more of her paranoia to try and guarantee it. Makes Nixon look like a saint in comparison.
Talk about PROJECTION!!!!
We have an old saying about this down here in the South, it’s:
“THE BIT DOG HOLLERS FIRST”
Why, unless it’s true, would such a claim stir the DNC to file a lawsuit?
OTOH...we have hundreds of years of PROOF of voter fraud and also over 50 recent years of explicit voter fraud to PROVE how Dems have RIGGED elections. Oh hell...we even now have, thanks to O'Keefe, video of criminal confessions, by DEM operatives, of how they have RIGGED them.
Maybe they should have sued Obama in 2008 for openly admitting that the polls are rigged in Chicago.
The dems trying yet another bit of distraction from the issues.
They don’t mind destroying the United States, as long as they can preside over the wreckage.
There used to be something called the First Amendment in this country.
It used to be you had a right to say what you wanted. Now it’s a hate crime.
Haven’t the Republicans been legally barred from suing Democrats over election fraud? Maybe this is a blessing in disguise!
ahh leftist rules for rigging #1: frivolous media law suits.
there you go again—rigging the election.
This law suit is the ULTIMATE height of DESPERATION by the Democraps.
Democrats repeatedly claim Russia is hacking into election computers. They can’t have it both ways.
Really? This is nothing but a nuisance suit to grab headlines in the lapdog media: The sort of thing that Gloria Allred files all the time.
The burden of proof in this lawsuit rests with the plaintiff, which is the DNC. There is no way the DNC will be able to prove Trump intends to to supress Democratic voter turnout by making “false” claims that the Democrats are engaging in voter, or electoral, fraud.
For one thing, the DNC is citing no evidence to substantiate it’s claim. On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to support Trump’s assertion, and the DNC knows it because electoral fraud has been part of their plan all along.
The DNC is simply laying the predicate to blame Trump for “disenfranchising” Democratic voters (focusing on what most likely will be lower-than-hoped-for turnout among Blacks and Hispanics) as it is looking increasingly likely that Clinton will lose.
Not a coincidence that they sued in New Jersey.
There is consent decree from a left-wing NJ judge that the RNC agreed to in 1982, which precludes Republicans from trying to prevent voting fraud (its racist, don’t you know).
I thought this was a bad joke or satire at first.
It apparently is real.
What stupidity. And desperation. Just wow.