Posted on 10/20/2016 9:38:51 AM PDT by Az Joe
..."persistent urge to vote for Hillary Clinton may be a sign of a troubling lack of testosterone..."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
No, high estrogen.
It is not!!! It is a symptom for DEMENTIA.....
No, just a visceral hatred of America.
Would that be estrogen pills or injections?
... child abuse aka leftist public education system.
Liberals must erase Christ from America before they can complete their nefarious takeover of the country. They're going to turn America into a totally demonic nightmare of a country. And once they erase Christ from America, God will erase America. Just the way He did, first, the northern tribes of Israel and, later, the southern kingdom.
Ambassador to U.N, Charles Malik: “The good in the United States would never have come into being without the blessing and the power of Jesus Christ….I know how embarrassing this matter is to politicians, bureaucrats, businessmen and cynics: but whatever these honored men think, the irrefutable truth is that the soul of America is at its best and highest, Christian.”
And the truth shall set us all free.
P.S. Don't forget what happened to the Second Temple.
A sincere evaluation of history works with scripture. I've noticed.
More likely...Can’t find your balls.
You be the judge..................
Possible. One must be a pussy to vote for that malignant thug.
I’d say more a symptom of low IQ
The word is not Prius. The word is Priapussy.
What you did there............I SEE IT.........
I find it ironic that God used the Assyrians (Arabs) to destroy the northern kingdom of Israel. He used the Babylonians (Arabs) to destroy the southern kingdom. And now, we have an Arabic potus bringing in millions of adherents to his blood thirsty death cult (Islam), also Arabs, which will assuredly plague us for generations. If not destroy us.
In this election, if you vote for Clinton you are most likely dead, an illegal immigrant, or Sybil—with a couple dozen identities.
I, personally, wouldn’t have the slightest idea. :)
That a woman who has been politically active, all her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bain of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government woujld rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she tottally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
