Posted on 10/19/2016 8:21:06 PM PDT by Kaslin
The final presidential debate of the 2016 presidential election is over and according to pollster Frank Luntz and his focus group, Trump was the winner of tonight's debate. That being said, it was close.
href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DebateNight?src=hash">#DebateNight pic.twitter.com/jDV5RP9eno— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) October 20, 2016
The other winner of the night is moderator Chris Wallace, who did an excellent job managing the candidates, asking questions and staying out of the debate as a contestant.
Chris Wallace is hands down the best moderator of the cycle, bravo #debates— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 20, 2016
The cuck vote? Are you talking about the guys who say “yes dear” by reflex?
Going with “Trump won’t accept a Hillary win” puts voter / election fraud on the table, BIG TIME!
The best I’ll say for Wallace is that he sucked less than the other mods.
Trump won by a mile.
hrc; shallow
defensive.
no substantive answers
Trump won but he didn’t clearly explain some things. You what he was talking about if you follow the news but a lot of people don’t. But that’s Trump’s style. No worries.
I would give the debate to Trump on substance, I would give the debate to Hillary on style. That said the debate structure should be analyzed in detail.
Chris Wallace’s questions were fair to both and he moderated the debate fairly one would think. It was not fair.
In light of the recent Wikileaks Chris Wallace left many things of great importance not even mentioned. That was by malice and intent. He was not fair nor honest but was very very good at appearing to be an honest moderator. He was far from being an honest moderator.
Hillary Clinton’s answers to all questions were polished and seamless without hesitation nor thought for pause. Trump would pause a few seconds and then answer. Hillary would immediately go into a smooth practiced speech. She had the questions in advance without any doubt as was proved in prior debates.
Please note that Wallace did not touch the fact that Donna Brazil had the questions in the prior debate, thank you Wikileaks. To touch that question is poison for Mike Wallace.
On rare occasions I have seen Hillary answer questions without preparation or warning of what will be asked. She is hopeless in those instances and looks like a deer in the headlights. On such rare occasions she is quickly ushered aside by aides.
I tip my hat to Mike Wallace. He has made a totally staged debate look like a real debate. He is good. He is very good. He is also, “El Rey de Los Gusanos.”
The translation is, “The King of Worms.” However, in Spanish it much lower than a worm in English. It is not profane but would be more like saying he is a pustule.
Hats off to Mike Wallace, “El Rey de Los Gusanos.” I shall now refer to him as, “La Pustula.”
Trump can never win debates on style, smooth practiced delivery or regurgitating talking points with most career politicians. Because that is all the career politicians have been doing all their life...speeches and debates. The country is a disaster (94 Million unemployed, 45 million on food stamps, major manufacturing plants gone, $20 Trillion debt). The career politicians got us here with smooth speeches and debates.
Trump on the other hand talked about immigration, taxes, jobs, foreign trade, military, vets, middle-east chaos, Obamacare, pro-life etc. which are issues which matter most to Americans. Therefore he clearly won on issues.
Well, that does explain her face.
I agree. Fox will continue to lose viewers. Maddow beat Megyn Kelly last week for the first time ever.
Like Al Gore didn’t accept the Bush win, and sued. I will guarantee if the election is a close as some polls suggest, the looser will not accept the results, and sue like Gore did.
Donald was restrained, trying to make the media feel good. He still did well, If he had been cut lose, he would have been a stick of dynamite
Gore didn’t accept there results in 2000, either.
Love how they say that “our Democracy depends on this” (acceptance). But we depend on rule of law, equal treatment, FBI/IRS/Justice being honest and fair, following the Constitution rather than working around it...all of which have been thrown out the window this past eight years without a peep from all the same people worrying about accepting the election results without question.
Yeah. That was a setup question by Wallace with the headlines already written. But to be fair .. Trump himself accepted the false premise. By saying the election is rigged now does raise a question -- if Trump wins will he then say the election was rigged?
Trump could have just asked Hillary if she will accept the results when he wins. The whole thing was weird as the election is still a few weeks away FCOL!
Having said all that Trump did extremely well tonight and looked Presidential and we might be nipping at gnats.
Notice every single headline is anti-trump.
OH puuuuleeeze
She was as biased and anti Trump as any of them
Yes we remember you were one of those hard core Cruz guys.
Just in case anyone mistook that post as anything but something you bitter guys would post.
“Megan Kelly was by far the best moderator from the point of view of patriotic conservatives”?
Yeah, OK..
Yep like I said on another thread (or maybe it was this one) That is all we will here for the next week or so.
That question was to set the narrative.
.
There is going to be rampant fraud in every city.
Only a fool would say otherwise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.