Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The video is much more compelling.

Someone should get this to Trump.

1 posted on 10/17/2016 9:52:02 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bgill

Has Luntz turned on Hillary?


2 posted on 10/17/2016 9:55:20 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Most “advice” to candidates from commentators is BS.

But this is quite good.


3 posted on 10/17/2016 9:55:29 AM PDT by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Trump turned down Luntz looking for his business a while ago and now it looks like Luntz is ‘pitching’ again.


4 posted on 10/17/2016 9:59:29 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Very sensible points from Luntz


5 posted on 10/17/2016 10:01:45 AM PDT by NYC-RepublicanCT (Trump vs Media/Dems/Obamas/NeverTrumpers. Still winning!!!l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill
The Federal audit point is one that caught me by surprise, but Luntz seems right on target on all of these.

If we're getting into the last three weeks of this campaign and Trump still hasn't closed the deal on a few of these items, then I really have to question the competence of his campaign staff.

8 posted on 10/17/2016 10:08:23 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill
Whatever issues TRump decides to emphasize, he should be prepared to slap down any "moderator," who shows clear bias in an effort to divert Trump from discussing the vital issues. I look for John Harwood, a pro-Clinton, pro-Obama reporter on CNBC, to try to force the discussion onto personality issues, such as the 2005 tape, and New York Times & Washington Post smears.

Trump should not get mad, but pivot back to the real issues, with remarks to the effect, "Now John, this is not a locker room event from another decade. I have already handled that--[or apologized for that]--it is the American future, at stake. It is about safe borders; safe neighborhoods, fair trade relations; about an American future that those of us who love America & the Americans will be able to recognize and take pride in."

9 posted on 10/17/2016 10:09:09 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

I don’t see any good reason to announce specific cabinet appointments.

Getting back on offense, yes, for sure!!


11 posted on 10/17/2016 10:13:31 AM PDT by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

[...he must pivot away from allegations of sexual misconduct.]

Weasel Wallace will absolutely ask him to respond to these allegations, a good answer, IMO, would be:

“You and the rest of media have been, on a daily basis, beating the drums about this subject, therefore, I will defer to my opponent to comment on these salacious allegations and when you and she are finished pandering to each other MAYBE we can get on with questions concerning saving our Republic from tyranny”


14 posted on 10/17/2016 10:17:06 AM PDT by RetSignman (Posting from the distant fringe of the forum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill
1. Trump must present a "forensic audit" of the federal budget.
2. Trump should announce who he would appoint to key positions like secretary of state and secretary of defense.
3. Trump needs to talk about Hillary Clinton in terms of more than three decades in Washington, D.C. Did you get the change you want? Did you get the change you deserve?
4. Trump must pivot away from allegations of sexual misconduct. "He's not winning when he's defending. He needs to move off of that."
5. Trump needs to present himself as the candidate of change, the one to shake up Washington to its core.

Can't disagree with any of the above other than number 5. He needs to make it clear why his "change" is to reinstate American liberty, leadership, power, and standing in the World. Hillary claims he wants America to go backwards.

Trump needs to address what made America great and the envy of the World, not to mention copied time and again. Now those same nations look at us and laugh or dismayed that the USA is no longer "The Shining City on the Hill". The USA has become a shadow of itself and kows to our known and potential enemies. The World became a better place from our original concepts of liberty, limited government, an equal opportunity. Now it is self-destructing from the lack of our strong leadership and direction.

Geeze, make me his speech writer or many on this board.

21 posted on 10/17/2016 10:35:54 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Agree with the comments. Trump needs to show he will be the President who will fix all these problems. Not mired in the mud with Hillary.


22 posted on 10/17/2016 10:40:25 AM PDT by MagillaX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Yea... right.

Have you already forgotten what Lutz was like during the primary season.

This swarmy little puke needs to crawl back in his hole and place his focus groups up his AZZ....


23 posted on 10/17/2016 10:45:53 AM PDT by Man from Oz (Obama is the skidmark left on AmericaÂ’s underpants after a 7 year long fart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill
A leader needs information to know how to win a free election?...just sayin’
24 posted on 10/17/2016 10:49:23 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Points three and five are his best bet. I don’t think he can give a detailed analysis of the budget and naming cabinet figures could be seen as presumptuous. Pivoting away from the sexual misconduct charges would be difficult since Clinton will harp on them. But asking her about change during her time in D.C. and presenting himself as the change architect that she could never be might be very effective.


26 posted on 10/17/2016 10:54:20 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Most of these sexual misconduct charges are so old they should be countered by “So, you could have hit me up for a lot of money back then. Why did you wait until now?”


28 posted on 10/17/2016 11:01:27 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

“Number three, he needs to talk about Hillary Clinton in terms of more than three decades in Washington, D.C. Did you get the change you want? Did you get the change you deserve?”

Trump has been saying this, even said it at the last ambush [aka debate].


32 posted on 10/17/2016 11:16:25 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (#neverhellary ... but then, I'm just an uneducated hayseed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Luntz belongs in the same receptacle with Rove.

At the end of the week put it out on the curb for pickup.


35 posted on 10/17/2016 11:42:33 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (22 days: Until Presdient Pre-elect becomes President Elect Donald J. Trump. Help is on the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson