Posted on 10/11/2016 9:11:46 AM PDT by bobsunshine
Wikileaks released its third set of John Podesta emails on Tuesday.
Wikileaks has released over 5,000 of Podesta’s emails in the last week. Podesta is a top Clinton advisor and confidant. In one email the Clinton team admits Hillary has “begun to hate everyday Americans.”
The email is titled “truth.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Well... To someone who was at the top of his class in reading comprehension throughout high school and college:
It reads to me as if she hates everyday Americans AND so does not want to use the phrase. This also taken in context of the overall information we have, and lacking preceding messages to the contrary.
This sort of thing (run together meanings) happens often in hasty compositions.
MSM won’t report on them because 1)They are in the tank for Clinton and 2)The Democrats claim that all of the WikiLeaks emails are fabricated by Russia. They are just ignoring them.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2015, at 4:20 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:
I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion.
I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
On Apr 19, 2015 3:58 PM, "Jake Sullivan" <jake.sullivan@gmail.com> wrote:
Has Hillary Clinton not made it abundantly clear to the country that she hated tens of millions of Trump supporters and actually called them racist, bigots and deplorable?
Why is this a surprise to anyone?
Did you miss that part where she called tens of millions of these folks, bigots, racist and deplorable?
Did you really miss all that?
Did ya miss how she historically treats her lowly staff and secret service detail?
PING!!!
Article and comments, esp #14 Image of email, #21 “conspire to produce an unaware citizenry” and #67 for list of reporters
Email
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3479226/posts?page=14#14
Unaware citizenry
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3479226/posts?page=21#21
Reporter list
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3479226/posts?page=67#67
Thanks, caww, & H/T WildHighlander57
As Trump said at the debate, “Hillary has hatred in her heart.”
Well...we don’t like her so much either.
Her Karma must be ready to explode.
I wonder if any of the Berniebots will become aware of this — how Hillary feels about them — or if they’ll just get their info from MSM which will never cover it.
“The debate commission is a 110% failure.”
I sent emails to the Commission On Presidential Debates after both debates telling them to do their job. Obviously bought and paid for by Clinton Crime Family so things won’t change. They’ll have Chris Wallace primed and ready to strike hard.
Yes; this is one of the best videos out there. I don’t tweet or FB, but I’m hoping that those who do spam cyberspace with it.
However, in these emails, they nearly universally cut quotation marks and even capitalization. This will be no bombshell. She hates the term “everyday Americans” is what the email references and that is all they have to say to put in away.
The email indicates that nevertheless they want her to use the term, once she announces her run.
I think that we should give John Podesta the benefit of the doubt, and consider him to be literate enough to include the quotes necessary to set off the phrase in the sentence.
He didn't do that, so we'll have to go with the original meaning of the sentence.
Who are we to second-guess a guy who makes a hundred bucks an hour in salary alone? :)
So, we are free, without instruction, to interpret this email in the manner of proper English. :)
@Romulus and other doubters:
freeper Paul R. wrote: Well... To someone who was at the top of his class in reading comprehension throughout high school and college:
It reads to me as if she hates everyday Americans AND so does not want to use the phrase. This also taken in context of the overall information we have, and lacking preceding messages to the contrary.
This sort of thing (run together meanings) happens often in hasty compositions.
Thanks for your analysis, Paul R.!
“Sounds like, when she said half of Trump supporters are deplorables, she really meant, like EVERYONE is deplorable. She really needs to clarify this point.”
Half the people are deplorable. The other half are useful idiots.
The Wiki leaked emails, from the beginning, were not a literary exercise.
We can see for ourselves that the style from the beginning of the releases are all written practically like sending a text.
They are mostly speaking to the choir and do so in grunts, spurts and short cuts. That is why they are hard to read with ease and comprehension.
Capitalization is often missing, and quotation marks appear virtually nowhere.
These things were fired out to the choir who needed no road map to understand the grunts, stops and starts, like talking to the family taking their menu orders for McDonalds.
What is “it” when he says”I think we should use it”?
Seriously, what is the source of that? Who is it from, and who is it to? Using it might not be quite so simple as "Hillary hates you", but unlike the "hates" e-mail, here, the content / meaning is not debatable.
I'd love to see Trump come out with the message "You are being used. Help me stop it."
She called Trump supporters “deplorables,” but in a speech to Goldman Sachs, she called the Dem base a “basket of losers.” I assume she’s referring to Bernie’s mob.
The woman is detestable. She looks down her nose at all Americans as unworthy of her.
Just like Captain Midnight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.