Posted on 09/27/2016 10:23:45 AM PDT by Kaslin
The State Department is still having an issue with emails. A court ordered the agency to provide documents to the Daily Caller News Foundation by Monday night, but a technical snafu caused them to miss the deadline. The file, the department explained, was just too big.
The size of the file attached to the email, however, exceeded the maximum file size allowed for the mobile device used by counsel for State, and thus transmission of the email did not complete.
SeeExhibit B. Counsel for State was unaware of this fact until this morning, September 27, 2016.
State sent a follow-up email at 7:45 a.m. Tuesday with the documents, along with an apology.
The Daily Caller had asked for documents to help with their investigation into whether Hillary Clinton and her staff took part in security training. In her interview with the FBI over the summer, Clinton said she didnt remember if she had or not.
Her mishandling of classified information on a private server suggests one of three things: One, she didnt receive briefings. Two, she did receiving training and, like she said, forgot it. Three, she received training and ignored it.
The Hill notes that this is an embarrassing headline for the State Department. The court ordered the next releases for Oct. 3 and Oct. 10.
So funny how she can remember EVERY REMARK Trump has made in the last 20 years but can’t remember one thing about her time as SOS to the FBI !!!!!!!
Email?
Sheesh. Use Box, Dropbox, Egnyte data rooms, SFTP, or any of the gazillion other available methods. How stupid are these State people?
The dog ate my homework.
“The dog ate my evidence” is rarely accepted as an excuse. Well in the old days, for the little people, it was rarely accepted.
Notice: that the will has nothing to do with inheritance.
File A
File B
File C
File D
Yeah, that’s way too complicated.
Meet the mastermind behind Clintons massive email coverup
New York Post ^ | September 4, 2016 | Paul Sperry / FR Posted by bushwon
EXCERPT--Newly released FBI documents detailing theinvest igation of Hillarys State dept emails reveal the aide who would likely follow her into the White House as chief counsel was central to a cover-up of evidence sought by investigators.
Yet despite signs, Clintons former chief of staff Cheryl Mills obstructed efforts by investigators to obtain Clintons emails, the FBI invited Mills to attend Hillarys interview at FBI headquarters as one of her lawyers.
Its absolutely outrageous, J/W President Tom Fitton said. The FBI saw massive document destruction and clear intent to withhold material evidence, he added, and they just ignored that obstruction, and even let her sit in on the interview.
The smoking gun is on page 16 of the FBIs 47-page report. It details how Mills ultimately made the determinations about which emails should be preserved before she and Clinton decided to delete the rest as personal. Clinton conducted both government and personal business using a personal email account clintonemail.com tied to an unsecured server set up in the basement of her New York home.
The FBI makes clear the procedure Mills used to sort out the emails was suspicious. Mills was the one who ordered the server host to move the emails from the server to a laptop where she could screen them. She told investigators she could not recall if emails with non-gov addresses were included in the transfer.
Its unlikely they were, because an aide who helped her search told the FBI she only screened for emails sent to or from Clinton with .gov and .mil not .com addresses.--SNIP-- (Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
=======================================
Hillary's email coverup operation and deliberate destruction of govt property was so vast, at least five State Dept govt employees, including Clintons top suck-up, Cheryl Mills, needed DOJ immunity deals to avoid prosecution....and to prevent Obama from being implicated.
By Robert Gehl, Federalist Papers
Hillary didn't know and Cheryl Mills didn't know either (250 times)
She doesnt recall, she doesnt recollect. Shes not sure. She just doesnt know. Hillary Clintons counsel, chief of staff (and US govt employee), doesnt know a lot of things. She cant remember testimony she gave. She isnt sure if she spoke to anyone she doesnt remember Hillarys email address, she doesnt even know who might know anything. During seven hours of testimony before Judicial Watch, Cheryl Mills said I dont know or some variation of ignorance at least 189 times. (Hillary didn't know 50 temes and blamed a blood clot on her brain for her forgetfulness).
Mills is clearly adept at finding ways to proclaim her ignorance. She was Bill Clintons counsel during the impeachment proceedings in the 1990s and has been a close advisor for both Bill and Hillary Clinton for decades.
Breitbart compiled a list of the near-200 times Mills declared how little she knows.
READ HERE http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/what-cheryl-mills-doesnt-know-could-last-seven-hours-wait-it-does
Very good!
I like.
I was wondering if anybody would ‘get it’!........................
We have reached the point where it would be more efficient to specify who in the higher echelons of federal office should not be held in contempt and arrested.
Of course, there is the added awkwardness that the ones who would be holding others in contempt and ordering their arrest should themselves be held in contempt and arrested.
It is quite the quagmire.
Pity the poor public servant.
I enjoy getting things that did not or would not have occurred to me.
Mobile device? What the hell are all the emails doing on a mobile device?
How bout simply uploading it to a “secure” server. Which can then be downloaded.
Of course I wouldn’t expect any government parasites to think of something that easy.
Well did she take the courses or not? What about mills and huma? Did you get the forms or not?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.