They both enable one another, one directly, the other indirectly.
Not if they wear burkas...........
Let’s lock them in a room together and find out....
I’d purchase a ticket...
Yes, but so far they aren’t using IEDs.
Tens of millions of wussified males are letting them get away with it.
And actively helping them.
Hard to say. Let’s put up a fence around a one mile by one mile square and fill it with equal numbers of radical feminists and radical mooselimbs and see what happens.
You make very good points. I’ve encountered in the professions just the kind of women you speak of. People just don’t stop to think of the woman when it comes to evils perpetrated by groups. The book “Hitler’s Furies,” for example, sheds bright, chilling light on how the Nazis could not have succeeded without the armies of secretaries, nurses, and other women, all enthusiastically travelling to and working in all the conquered areas behind the scenes to make sure the the Nazis operations were carried out.
They share a common trait: they’re hairy and they smell.
They’ve killed a lot more people in abortion clinics than terrorists.
No. The feminists don’t actually maim/kill people. They may _want_ to, but are largely restrained by Constitutional* law.
I’m not saying they’re not bad, but if you’re going to put them on a spectrum of badness they’re not near the top of the charts.
(* - loosely speaking, vs...say...Sharia.)
Yes, because the feminists are traitors, and the Muslims depend on them to get in.
Both are killers, though.
Muslim women need burkas. Feminists need to wear a double burka, in case the first one falls off.
The feminists promote abortion and say nothing about the misogynistic hell holes of Sharia law and in fact are content in drawing absurd moral equivalences between Christianity and Islam. They will excuse Islamic oppression of women because being Islamic in Western society is part of the left’s protected class. They stand on the same moral field with ISLAM.
Do we have to choose? - they’re both vile.
We ought to put them in a remote island together and let them coexist. Throw in BLM and leftists too while you’re at it.
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague." Marcus Tullius Cicero
No. Feminazis are screechy, annoying, and ugly but at least they don’t behead people (except the unborn) or blow things up.
You can contain them by plugging your ears and restricting the purchase of sensible shoes. But the jihadi vermin need to be put down like rabid rats.
Are Radical Feminists Worse Than Radical Muslims? Put them in a FIGHT CAGE, let’s see.
They are more effective, perhaps, at destroying the culture, but as far as I know, radical feminists haven’t killed anyone in pursuit of their anti-social ideology.