Posted on 09/18/2016 5:02:58 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sep 18th, 2016
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine; Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Kaine; Kellyanne Conway, campaign manager for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump; Gov. John Kasich, R-Ohio.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Kaine, Conway; Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee; Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Kaine; Republican vice presidential nominee Mike Pence.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Kaine; Christie.
Now you are there.
Nothing has to(and seldom does) make sense in dem-land all it has to be is repeated and believed.
SR 511 for McCain recites outright falsehoods. Congress at work!
Here is something that is full of logic and also helps explain what is going on in the world of terrorism:
.....................
I do believe Donald Trump is correct in our police at all levels are doing a thankless job and they are being misused from Border Patrol to Chicago PD. Look at New York, the most watched city in cameras in America, and no footage is being presented in who planted those devices. That is an impossibility, so it again begs the question in you have field agents and officers risking their lives looking for bombs in trash bins, while the political minders on top are covering up for the crime, not to offend their Soros or OPEC donors.
This is the failed Obama Police State. It is the political leadership which has mislead the police and caused this distrust by the covering up of Hillary Clinton’s crimes or attempting to turn every crisis to gun control.
http://www.vocativ.com/360127/isis-supporters-rush-to-celebrate-nyc-explosion/
(actually this excerpt is from LC but another link pops up.)
Makes some really good sense. With all the cameras there are in NYC we cant come up with one suspect planting the explosive devices? Doesnt pass the smell test. as LC says.
Yep, that’s the one. I read it in real time while Reed was dealing with a supposedly constitutionally dedicated judge who screwed him over by finding that all the info that Reed wanted to present was “too inflammatory to be presented to a jury”. He never said it was untrue.
I’m working from memory here because my copy is in storage since 2004 when we moved to AZ. Reed ended up literally escaping from Arkansas which was a story in itself.
This all goes back to the Mena airport (where drugs were brought in) and even Sam Donaldson went there to check it out, but somehow couldn’t find anything newsworthy enough to continue. IOW he checked it out to be able to “debunk” it, or maybe he just wanted to live.
It was a bestseller and I was still naïve enough then to think that would take care of Clinton. Sigh.
They could have/SHOULD HAVE used this as Trump's reason for demanding a copy of Obama's birth certificate.
Yeah if the clintons were cats they would be working on life # 74 at least.There is little question they have enough on anyone who could possibly indict them to stay out of the pokey so far.
>> Senator Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961 not long after its admission to the Union on August 21, 1959. <<
That, gentlemen, is not a verifiable fact.
>> We find it inconceivable that Senator Obama would have been ineligible for the Presidency had he been born two years earlier. <<
I find it inconceivable that they would take him at his word, especially after he stated he was born in Kenya, and other outside references saying the same...and especially after knowing he was raised in Indonesia, and mentored by Frank Marshall Davis, and friends of terrorist Bill Ayers.....
Yeah, that right there is some salt-of-the-earth, red-blooded, all American boy!
Maybe. He may have been born in Canada. And maybe he's somebody else. There is no BC. Any nutty theory is equally as credible as his "word".
to an American mother
Who may not have been eligible to convey citizenship due to age and length of residence. She was present in Washington State two weeks after the blessed event. How did that happen?
he is a natural born citizen
Morrison Waite says that's a stretch.
and who his father was doesnt matter.
Of course it does, unless that's not his father who really is a US citizen, but then that makes his whole life's narrative a huge whopper.
Obama himself stated he was born a British Subject....once again, so much for being a "NBC".
The mediots are obsessed about the birther issue. Her numbers have to be cratering among blacks.
As he said:
"She started it, I finished it."
CLANG!..aang..aang..aang
Exactly. It means nothing, which is why we need to adjudicate it. This should not be at the whim of the Senate. The Senate commissioned the Tribe-Olson opinion.
The only reason the Senate did this was to legitimize Obama. Yes, Obama. Look at who co-sponsored the resolution. Why the gratuitous mention of Obama's eligibility in the Tribe-Olson opinion? It is clear to me.
That is also controversial and needs to be killed. Anchor babies and their parents are subject to the jurisdiction of their native country
We need this tested as well. A President Trump could issue an executive order or Congress could pass a law outlawing birthright citizenship. The ACLU and others will challenge it and it will go to the courts up to SCOTUS. If SCOTUS does not uphold the law, then the last recourse is a Constitutional amendment. Ireland was the last European country to get rid of birthright citizenship. They did it thru constitutional amendment.
No. The author considers them to be foreigners. Even though born here, their parents are not citizens. They are also citizens of the parents' nationality.
Right now, they are considered US citizens eligible to be President unless the courts rule otherwise. There are two ways to become a citizen: naturalization or by birth. Hence the need to define what natural born citizen really means by the courts as it pertains to the Presidency. The candidacies of Rubio and Jindal raised these kinds of questions.
Again, I really don't want to go down this path because it will just consume too much energy at this point. We will then get into the 14th Amendment, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), etc.
It then becomes a tar baby. It is lose-lose for Trump to start discussing it again. The MSM will report selectively on what he says and use it against him. As Trump says, he finished it. I fully anticipate it will come up at the debates. I hope Trump deflects it and says that there are more important things to talk about and Obama is not on the ballot.
Late to this but the Secret Service was not there because the double is not a Presidential candidate or a former first lady. So we have a double going out the door to the street to play the media and the SS agent in charge says out loud for all to hear, “she can go anywhere she wants to...ain’t my job.”
Well it raised my hackles, I didn't hear anybody else talking about it.
Dam i missed that where can we find that.?
Martha is a nasty, angry pimple ridden beyotch who had to do her training in Boston.
There were not enough psycho viewers on Channel 5 at the time.
She has been pissed off ever since.
Horrible Human being! Yecch.
It’s too depressing to think about ... I’ll have to check it out later. Thanks for the links Cboldt.
ask her about her Adult Cystic Acne and how she “cured” it,
.
That should send her right into space. I am not being nasty, I live with somebody who “copes” with it.
Hey Martha.. do you sandpaper your face every Sunday?
These evil ones are bringing about my “nasty” side.
Sorry.
I am just so pissed off.
Advertisements pay the bills. The experts target watchers likely to buy products. The watchers who are easily influenced by advertisements, are not the smartest people in society. The news is kept at a 6th grade level and advertisements are at a 9th grade level.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.