She’s doing terribly and leads by 7? I say BS.
Trump will win FL and OH - my guess is he’ll also take PA.
People are going take a hard look at Hillary and she doesn’t have it.
I mean when all she can do is criticize Trump, she’s not making the case for why she should be elected President.
Trump has her right where he wants her.
Not directed at you, but this is another fallatious premise of an article in that Trump has to win PA. Trump has several paths to the nomination and most do not require PA. However, if PA goes Trump, it’s impossible for Clinton to win.
Wait, it’s only 4 points among registered voters? What did the first poll include, non voters?
If it’s 4 among registered, he’s tied or leads among likely voters.
PA just sent one crooked conniving Democrat feminist shrew (Kathleen Kane) off to the jailhouse.
Another crooked conniving Democrat feminist shrew (Katie McGinty) is flailing badly in a race against incumbent Pat Toomey who bears the two strikes of being a Wall Street guy AND an attempted gun-grabber.
This is not a good year to be a crooked, conniving Democrat feminist shrew on the Pennsylvania ballot.
The cacklin bitch is going nowhere but DOWN! ...
“Among registered voters, Clinton’s lead drops to four points: 43 to 39 percent.”
Do they mean it drops to 4 among likely voters?
No way Clinton leads by 7 among likely voters but only 4 among registered voters, has to be the other way around.
Unlike Romney, McCain, Bush, Dole...Trump will gain strength as we reach the end game.
she looks a little bit like Yoda in that picture IMO, a blonde haired white skinned Yoda.
“Also, theres this from Nate Silvers FiveThirtyEight:
Repeating myself a bit, but people underrate how fragile Clinton’s Electoral College advantage will be if the race keeps tightening overall. Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) August 31, 2016”
- - - -
Little clown Natee hedging his bets this time after being a big loser predicting Trump in the primaries. You’re gonna lose again little girl.
That's old-style thinking and a recipe for another disappointing loss. This is the 21st Century and a very inter-connected world. The notion that Trump needs to "camp out" in one or two states is ludicrous.
What Trump did yesterday in Mexico and Arizona were truly national events with massive media exposure. He won over far more people with his immigration speech in Phoenix last night than he would if he spent eight weeks going to a hundred small Pennsylvania towns just so he could shake hands and kiss babies.
Yes, by all means have some rallies in Florida and Pennsylvania but don't camp there and ignore the rest of the country.
“Actually, all roads for Trump winning this election count on him taking the Keystone State and Florida”
Actually, that’s total nonsense. He can get a win or tie (broken by the heavily Republican dominated state delegations in the House, where each state gets a single vote, so MT is as powerful as CA) by keeping Romney’s states and adding:
-FL, OH, and the three small swing states (NV, IA, NH)
-FL, OH, WI (where he’s only down by 3 in the latest poll), and 2 of the 3 small swing states
-FL, OH, WI, IA or NV, and the 1 electoral vote from Maine’s Congressional District 2
-FL, OH, MI (I think winning PA is more likely than winning MI though)
-FL, OH, VA, and any additional swing state (PA looks more doable than VA at this point, but looking at historical voting patterns that may not turn out to be the case)
-FL, OH, CO, and 2 of the 3 small swing states (ditto to what I said about VA in regard to CO)
7 points is still outside the margin of error. And she is uncomfortably close to 50.
This is great news. Donald Trump is doing very well with the working class western part of the state, but poorly with the college educated Philly suburbs where Romney polled well. Hopefully they’re coming back into line after the latest Hillary corruption news.
This is a week old and things have been moving fast.
Hey Hillary;
Take this quarter.
Go downtown and get some RAT to gnaw that thing off your face.
PA has a Democrat governor. Trump isn’t going to win PA.