Huma Abedin was listed on the masthead as editor of a terrorist supporting magazine at age 20. But Clinton people say Huma did no editing. She was paid to be a figurehead on the terrorist supporting magazine but Huma did no work for the magazine.
1 posted on
08/22/2016 6:37:46 AM PDT by
detective
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: detective
We know who and what these people are.
2 posted on
08/22/2016 6:38:58 AM PDT by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
To: detective
Lies, lies...and more lies from chronic liars.
3 posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:21 AM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
To: detective
Huma, dear, can you define taqqiyah for all the non-muslims watching?
4 posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:24 AM PDT by
Paine in the Neck
( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
To: detective
So Huma accepted money from terrorists.
Just like the Clinton foundation.
5 posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:29 AM PDT by
Gamecock
(There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
To: detective
The Clinton campaign is lying and hopes people are too stupid to understand the truth.
6 posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:37 AM PDT by
detective
To: detective
Right. The Muslim activist was just a figurehead. I wonder, though, who actually did the editing?
7 posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:37 AM PDT by
HomerBohn
(Liberals and Slinkys: Good for nothing but make you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
To: detective
I am not a crook/terrorist
8 posted on
08/22/2016 6:40:11 AM PDT by
Mercat
To: detective
She was "PAID". Nuff said....
Pssst....Born and raised muzzie...
To: detective
“My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill saidOhhhhhhhh. Okay. That makes sense.
10 posted on
08/22/2016 6:40:32 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: detective
CAMPAIGN: “She didn’t inhale.”
LAMESTREAMS: “What SHE said.”
11 posted on
08/22/2016 6:41:47 AM PDT by
Migraine
(Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
To: detective
To: detective
16 posted on
08/22/2016 6:46:06 AM PDT by
libertarian27
(FR Cookbooks - On Profile Page)
To: detective
An editor who did no editing???
Then why even list her?
17 posted on
08/22/2016 6:47:00 AM PDT by
proudpapa
(Trump 2016!)
To: detective
The media will accept ANY THING CLINTON SAYS
18 posted on
08/22/2016 6:47:57 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
To: detective
What does Mr. Danger have to say about this?
19 posted on
08/22/2016 6:48:31 AM PDT by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: detective
"Taqiyya!"20 posted on
08/22/2016 6:48:34 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: detective
Chalk this denial up to the phrase "Islam - believe it, or else!"
22 posted on
08/22/2016 6:49:18 AM PDT by
wtd
To: detective
“She was paid to be a figurehead on the terrorist supporting magazine but Huma did no work for the magazine. “
Because in the Muslim world, unknown, 20-year old, FEMALE figureheads have respect akin to that of an Imam.
23 posted on
08/22/2016 6:50:01 AM PDT by
Rebelbase
(Vote Against Oppressive Humidity!)
To: detective
BULLSH!T!!!!
More muslim BULLSH!T!!!!
You can’t trust a muslim (taqiyya, etc.), and you can’t trust Hillary and the Dims!!!!
24 posted on
08/22/2016 6:50:43 AM PDT by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: detective
Give it a week. When Clinton's polling group determines that 60% of the voting public doesn't know what the hell the pollster is aksing them about, she will send her spokesman out to say, "Of course she worked for a radical mooslim journal. We never said anything otherwise."
See also: Obama Administration Paid Ransom for Hostages
25 posted on
08/22/2016 6:51:07 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
