Skip to comments.
Huma Abedin denies active role at radical Muslim journal
New York Post ^
| August 21, 2016
| Paul Sperry
Posted on 08/22/2016 6:37:46 AM PDT by detective
Top Hillary Clinton confidante Huma Abedin played no formal role in a radical Muslim journal — even though she was listed as an editor on the hate-filled periodical’s masthead for a dozen years, a campaign rep claimed Sunday.
“My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said hours after The Post broke the bombshell story. “She did not play a role in editing at the publication.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clintonhuma; humabio; humaradicalislam; humaradicalmuslim; muslims; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Huma Abedin was listed on the masthead as editor of a terrorist supporting magazine at age 20. But Clinton people say Huma did no editing. She was paid to be a figurehead on the terrorist supporting magazine but Huma did no work for the magazine.
1
posted on
08/22/2016 6:37:46 AM PDT
by
detective
To: detective
We know who and what these people are.
2
posted on
08/22/2016 6:38:58 AM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
To: detective
Lies, lies...and more lies from chronic liars.
3
posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:21 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
To: detective
Huma, dear, can you define taqqiyah for all the non-muslims watching?
4
posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:24 AM PDT
by
Paine in the Neck
( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
To: detective
So Huma accepted money from terrorists.
Just like the Clinton foundation.
5
posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:29 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
(There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
To: detective
The Clinton campaign is lying and hopes people are too stupid to understand the truth.
6
posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:37 AM PDT
by
detective
To: detective
Right. The Muslim activist was just a figurehead. I wonder, though, who actually did the editing?
7
posted on
08/22/2016 6:39:37 AM PDT
by
HomerBohn
(Liberals and Slinkys: Good for nothing but make you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
To: detective
I am not a crook/terrorist
8
posted on
08/22/2016 6:40:11 AM PDT
by
Mercat
To: detective
She was "PAID". Nuff said....
Pssst....Born and raised muzzie...
To: detective
“My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill saidOhhhhhhhh. Okay. That makes sense.
10
posted on
08/22/2016 6:40:32 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: detective
CAMPAIGN: “She didn’t inhale.”
LAMESTREAMS: “What SHE said.”
11
posted on
08/22/2016 6:41:47 AM PDT
by
Migraine
(Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
I guess several people at that publication are about to have bad accidents and heart attacks.
To: Mercat
< I am not a crook/terrorist
"I did NOT have sex with that woman"!
To: detective
The Clinton campaign is lying and hopes people are too stupid to understand the truth.
*************
So far that tactic seems to have largely worked for them. The sheeple are naive and gullible.
To: detective
To: detective
16
posted on
08/22/2016 6:46:06 AM PDT
by
libertarian27
(FR Cookbooks - On Profile Page)
To: detective
An editor who did no editing???
Then why even list her?
17
posted on
08/22/2016 6:47:00 AM PDT
by
proudpapa
(Trump 2016!)
To: detective
The media will accept ANY THING CLINTON SAYS
18
posted on
08/22/2016 6:47:57 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
To: detective
What does Mr. Danger have to say about this?
19
posted on
08/22/2016 6:48:31 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: detective
"Taqiyya!"
20
posted on
08/22/2016 6:48:34 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
