The average IQ of a native African is 80-85. Someone with a college education is rare and most make corrupt leaders.
very interesting introduction but both links go nowhere unfortunately..?
And there were no great black African civilizations.
WAY-SIST ! WAY-SIST !
No matter how far you run away from your problems, you always bring the source with you: You.
I’d like to make a comparison to when poor people suddenly come into real wealth, like winning the lottery or whatever, then squander it because they don’t have the skills or experience to maintain and grow that wealth. Seeing as it’s a minefield where one inarticulate word or phrase can blow me up, I’ll leave it as a vaguery and let each individual reader finish the thought in his/her own way. You get the basic point.
This discussion has come up at my house. Finding a country was hopeless. We started trying to find cities. Other than Atlanta we weren’t able to come up with one. Even that may be dubious if it depends on wealth transfers from others.
Median IQ:
Asians: 110
Whites: 100
Amer. Black: 85
S. Amer.: 85
Sub-Saharan Black: 70
Austr. Aboriginal: 65
According to Stefan Molyneux, Democratic Republicanism is impossible if median IQ is 90 or lower. The “sweet spot” for criminality and violence is 85.
The Democrat strategy, abetted by the Catholic bishops, is to import a new population who will vote socialist and pro-abortion. The Republic cannot exist as the median IQ drops.
Since it is VERBOTEN to discuss IQ, all economic and academic inequality must be blamed on the racism of whites. This is why, as white racism has disappeared, accusations of racism have exploded.
The U.S. is a doomed banana republic. We just hide it better under mountains of unpayable debt & financial obligations, the illusion of competing political parties, and the continual erosion of basic freedoms and rights.
To be far, the boundaries of many African nations were drawn by the colonial powers with little regard for friction between tribes, etc.
Imagine a Baltic nation established in, say, 1700 that was 1/3 Prussian, 1/3 Polish, and 1/3 Russian. Such a nation would be constant turmoil, and would have difficulty stabilizing itself.
Yes, I know that’s not the whole problem, but it does play a part.
Botswana isn’t a great short-term success story like some of the former Eastern Bloc nations, but it has had a stable democracy since 1966 (when it became an independent nation) and is steadily increasing it’s economic capabilities. AIDS has hit the country hard, but the government has taken solid steps to slow down the spread of AIDS and has made significant progress. Botswana has very low corruption, especially for an African nation, and has many reasons to be proud of it’s efforts.
While most nations in Africa are rife with corruption, tribalism, communism, Islamic influences, and a culture that punishes success, there are nations like Botswana which are truly “developing nations”.
Been saying this since I was 10.
Rhodesia. Haiti. you name it. When the blacks take over it becomes a hellhole in about 2 weeks.
Incorrect but I admit they are not the ones you hear about.
It is sort of like saying there are no successful South America nations.
Also incorrect but since they are not the ones in the news a lightly educated person could be forgiven for thinking that.
What is not forgivable is someone to write an article about it and apparently do little or no research.
Nor are there any great Amerindian civilizations and any nation run by a preponderance of that DNA is in trouble
Civilization has laggards and front runners and in between a
The meteoric rise of Western European Christian civilization which literally colonized the world and in the process brought civilization often to savages is now being dismantled by the Left and a weak Right through greivance politics and social justice when in reality it’s just an avenue of revenge by the descendents of brown and black and even sadly enough often yellow minorities even who have chosen to destroy white civilization as redress for what they perceive as injustice
And it’s happened very fast with now Trump as the first guy brave enough to say wait a minute
This is why the Left and angry non whites are quiet about Islam
Islam is an accelerant to burn it all down so much quicker
It’s the Kingsford charcoal lighter to get it all going that much quicker
And folks this may have roots in the Fabians and Debs early socialist and one world types but it’s really really taken off past 30 to 50 years based on one thing more than anything else
Non white and non Christian immigration to the West
And it will likely destroy us
Meanwhile the collaborative Ryan GOP rolls on and many GOP are all for it
It won’t end well...it could be the bloodiest episode of human history yet
It’s a great time for HIM to return before my kids and grandkids have to live this inevitability
I was in college during the years of the revolution in Rhodesia where the black majority population was revolting to overthrow the ruling white majority. Ian Smith was the president of Rhodesia.
During that time I took an English lit course with a professor who was seldom on the subject. He discussed Rhodesia occasionally and its prospects under black rule. He said plainly that it would fail under black rule “because they didn’t create it”. I often remember that and consider whether individuals or groups can maintain and sustain something they didn’t create.
Now we have Zimbabwe instead of Rhodesia.
I also doubt he is popular on Stormfront given the amount of blame the author places on white civilizations for what he says are the current state of affairs.
Black and not popular by demand? So why if a white man says the same thing as the author does, is a racist?