Hillary wins Le-a (the dash don't be silent), and
Which latter includes most of the press.
And their House of Cards begins to burn like the cheap flash paper from which it is constructed.
believable - laughed out loud
Also, very insightful revelations...
Now that’s just plain silly. He (lyin’ king) already told us that there isn’t a single segment of the economy that isn’t better off today than when he was immaculated 7+ years ago. No, really. Even cnnnbccBSmsnbcusatoday said so. Then he said we’re more educated, healthier, wealthier, safer and have more peace around the world with his supreme guidance. Then he tells us the useless POS hildabama from her previous attempt at the wh is now more qualified than any being in the entire galaxy. No, really. No breakfast for me.
——Mass belief is powerful.——
I call it riding the band wagon
The tendency is quite noticeable on Free Republic once it really starts to roll
The MSN home page has gone completely over the wall on backing her.
538: “I don’t know, man. There are a bunch of smaller groups out there doing real polls. I don’t know if anyone can keep this under wraps. They had to talk Silver off the edge of the building yesterday. It was bad.”
RTN: “He was literally going to throw himself out a window?”
538: “Yeah–he was–well, but we’re on the second floor. He was just really pissed. I mean, he got a call from the White House telling him to fix it and shit.”
+++++
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3457261/posts?page=44#44
I don't know all the facts of that, but considering how she recently skated from multiple felonies I would not doubt it in the least if she is responsible for those deaths. The fact is the Clintons are above the law, time after time after time they have skated and the only possible explanation for that is that they must threaten people with death. I mean think about it: What would make James Comey insane enough to throw the FBI and his reputation out the window for this effin psychotic lying b*tch? Comey must know he will forever been known in the history books as the guy who let a woman walk who was obviously guilty as hell. What would make him do that? The only possible explanation I can come up with is either he was threatened with death or they threatened to kill his family and he knew they would do it and get away with it.
Amen! The purpose of the mainstream media “polls” showing Hillary leading Donald by so many points is to set the stage for the Democrat Party to steal the election for Hillary.
Hillary wins Le-a (the dash don't be silent), and
Which latter includes most of the press.
Bttt.
5.56mm
What, did he get too close to the server?
And got wiped, like with a cloth?
Interesting, but I take this with a grain of salt. Anything with unamed sources are usually bogus.
We’ll find out November 8
The strategy is to make it look like she is winning or at least close so that when the voter machines hand the election to the dems, the pubs can plausibly go belly up without a whimper.. Too big a lead in the polls leading to the election make it a bit hard to swallow the big lie, though it seemed to work well enough in 2012.
Astro-turfing her “rallies” also.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3457232/posts
Read through the thread and see FReepers doing what the MSM, Drudge, Brietbart etc refuse to do
Who are these people that base their vote, or even if they will vote, on what one stranger tells another over the phone about their political beliefs? The dumbest eligible voters that still manage to vote or what?
Supposedly the dumbest 10% of eligible voters who actually vote decide all national elections, the ‘swing voters.’ The ones that somehow manage to vote, but vote one way then another and usually can’t give a rational reason as to why. It could be a debate flub, the physical appearance of a candidate, or someone’s perceived popularity.
So no matter the result, con or lib, pub or dem, it is supposedly actually decided by these 10% or so of people. That is pretty grim when you think about it.
Freegards
Is this outfit, Freedom Outpost, legit? Does it have credibility?
It was a fun read. How true, no clue.
Totally believable but it also says that we need some of our own institutions wrt media and polling services, we’re basically blind...
Thanks for posting. I found this snippet very interesting:
538: “Well, Nate’s a liberal. No secret there. When he saw what was happening he flipped out. Had us look for bugs–something gone wrong–looking at the feeds. Of course nothing was wrong. Nothing had changed. Then he got on the phone with his people embedded with Q-Pac and Survey Monkey and PPP and all those guys–”
RTN:”Wait–embedded?”
538: “Huh? Oh, yeah–it’s a big social club. The pollsters all work together. We have a Slack-room that’s sharing all kinds of results and skews and all that. That’s how we keep it all orderly.”
RTN: “Orderly?”
538: “Sure–what? You think it’s . . . random? Come on. Who do you think pays for the polls? People who want results. You’re buying media. It’s like ads or . . . I don’t know. Like newspaper stories? You pay 30k for a poll of Florida, it says what you want.”
The 538 guy mentions a Slack room (See www.slack.com). If there were any hackers around, hack that Slack room and capture the traffic and post that to WikiLeaks...BOOM.
HA!
Gimme dats and queers.
"Right about now I am reminded of something I heard a week or two ago on a recent episode of The Official Hagmann & Hagmann Report. It was something Dave Hodges of the Common Sense Show said that has really stuck with me. He said:
“We are at a crossroads in history … We are being given a chance. We as a country are being given a chance to make some substantial changes spiritually, emotionally, physically, economically, politically … we have a real opportunity we will not get again in my lifetime … and our window is short. Our window is very short.”