Posted on 07/07/2016 10:30:36 AM PDT by Hojczyk
During testimony before Congress on Thursday, FBI Director James Comey stated that the FBIs interview with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not under oath or recorded, but it still would be a crime to lie to the FBI.
Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the five or six who did interview Clinton.
He was then asked, did she testify or talk to them under oath? Comey answered, No. But added that its still a crime to lie to us.
When asked if there was a transcript of the interview, Comey stated that there wasnt one because the interview wasnt recorded, but there was an analysis of Clintons interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I can understand the lack of need to be sworn testimony..... but the lack of a recording; clearly an Error and Omission.
It’s not required under rules, law, whatever, that interviews of anyone be recorded? I think I would demand any dealings I have with the alphabet agencies be recorded.
Nothing will happen, and Comey will do nothing substantial, nor will he resign. It will just fade away, like the IRS and every other outrage.
This is because they are all government employees. There isnt a patriot among them. This we know, because nothing righteous or principled has happened in 40 years.
They are all corrupt, and care only for their GD pension. Including the Military leadership.
Sorry, Comey, your fifteen minutes are over.
Get lost.
I think per the new DoJ policy interviews are only recorded if the suspect is in federal custody.
The FBPraetorians needed some OT...
It’s against the law to lie to the most powerful FBI? Can anyone quote the official law?
One of the biggest problems in this country is too many “Cartmans” saying “Respect my authora-tie!”
It wouldn’t do for me to be in congress. I would have said to him “You look me in the eye. You’re a GD liar! And if any of you democrats or rinos don’t like what I said then stop hiding behind your title and let’s take it outside.”
WOW, UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!
My guess is they were given a direct order from O-B-Won.
Martha Stewart wasn’t the Dem nominee for POTUS.
BINGO
So how does the prosecutors ever compare her testimony to all of the known facts? By memory?
I read an article sometime back and I was once questioned by two ex-FBI agents and it bares this out.
To start ( especially after learning the hard way,)never go into a questioning session without a witness present and or recording all of it yourself. I read and it appears to be truthful,the FBI will have a questioner and a note taker of their own present and the will write the statement the way they want it.Even if it appears they are recording in the long run they will deny it if you try to prove a point of truth that does not jive with what they want.Again I sadly say it appears there is no ethics or truth involved when it comes to coming after an ordinary person.
Right on the money !!
No, they applaud and donate money to the Felonness’ are-education Fund. I am done with these liars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.