Posted on 07/06/2016 6:49:36 PM PDT by naturalman1975
THE Grand Mufti of Australia has just proved that Pauline Hanson is right to feel threatened by Islam in this country.
Ibrahim Abu Mohammad has written an astonishing letter warning that to criticise even a gay-hating imam is to risk inciting terrorist attacks against us.
His inflammatory letter perfectly demonstrates why Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was a fool to hold an Iftar dinner for the Mufti and other troubling Muslim leaders during the election campaign.
And Turnbulls dinner shown on all TV news bulletins may explain why Hansons vote on Saturday was so high, helping her to win as many as three Senate seats on a strident agenda that includes a call for a royal commission into Islam.
More Australians might now support Hansons call when they read the Muftis letter, which to me conveys an implied and sinister warning: that to criticise a Muslim cleric is to criticise Islam itself and risk death. Shut up or else.
I ask: is there any leader of any other faith in this country who could suggest something so intimidating to stifle discussion of his ideology and the lethal radicalism it inspires?
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.news.com.au ...
Maybe Australians can save their country by exporting EVERY Moslem back to the shithole country they came FRom.
America needs to do that too!
mufti shmufti, the imam is a schmuck
(There is nothing unique/special about the words "radical Islam"!!! It is just "Islam.")
The world is starting to wake up.
“Even a gay-hating imam”? Like that’s the most extremist, least acceptable kind of imam there is?
Look at those happy faces. Nothing like the dead-eyed stares of the 9/11 terrorists.
Maybe Australians can save their country by exporting EVERY Moslem back to the shithole country they came FRom.
Japanese Court Rules Blanket Surveillance Of Muslims Is Necessary To Stop Terrorism
The Daily Caller ^ | June 30, 2016 | Jacob Bojesson
Posted on 7/1/2016, 12:21:13 AM by 2ndDivisionVet
Muslims in Japan lost a lawsuit over the governments surveillance of them in May, with the court saying its a necessary counter-terrorism tactic.
Japanese police have monitored places of worship, halal restaurants and Muslim organizations for years in what they label a counter-terrorism measure. A 2010 leak of 114 Japanese police files quickly spread across the world with 10,000 downloads in 20 countries. The files contained personal information of 72,000 Muslims in several countries, showing just how widespread the surveillance is.
A group of 17 Muslims living in Japan sued the government for infringing on their constitutional rights. The Muslims eventually received close to $900,000 in compensation, but the countrys Supreme Court still finds the profiling and surveillance tactics necessary and inevitable to prevent terrorism.
We were told we dont have a constitutional case, said Junko Hayashi, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, according to Al Jazeera. Were still trying to figure out, how is it not constitutional?
The court case didnt make much noise in Japan the debate instead focused on how the leak will hurt counter-terrorism efforts in the future.
About 70,000 Muslims live in Japan. The vast majority, 90 percent, are foreigners
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3445353/posts
Swiss Do the Unthinkable: Deny Muslims Citizenship
informationliberation.com ^ | 7/1/2016 | Chris Menahan
Posted on 7/4/2016, 6:13:18 AM by rktman
In a move which no doubt has American immigration officials baffled, the Swiss are denying citizenship to Muslim after Muslim for failing to integrate into their society!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3446139/posts
We’ll lose the country if we continue this senseless, insane accommodation to Islam!
Islam should be declared a terrorist organization and banned in America!
moozlum demand you submit...or they will murder you and your family. Peaceful??? NOT!
Bolt is pointing out - as he has numerous times before - that the left in Australia (and presumably elsewhere) who are normally so obsessed with the idea of 'homophobia' seem willing to give Muslims and Islam a pass on this. They will condemn Christians for disagreeing with the idea that homosexuals should be married - but ignore the fact that there are Muslim groups murdering homosexuals. He's talking about their hypocrisy. To people who aren't aware of Bolt's writings, this may not be obvious - but to anybody who does know his work, that's clearly why he's pointing this out.
Why is this Islamic fascist still sucking air?
I wonder why too. You'd think that, in a post-911 world, any muslim who threatens westerners would get an immediate bullet in his head. Or at least a visit from a drone.
Then if you are dumb enough to submit, they might still kill you and your family.
Just signed by the Knicks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.