Judicial Watch Asks Justice Inspector General to Investigate Loretta Lynch-Bill Clinton Meeting

Judicial Watch ^ | June 30, 2016

[Zakeet]

Judicial Watch today requested that the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General investigate the meeting yesterday between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President William J. Clinton on board a parked private plane on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona on June 29, 2016, according to multiple press reports.

President Clinton is the spouse of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the former Secretary of State, who is purportedly the subject of a national security crime investigation pertaining to the mishandling of national defense information processed by Mrs. Clinton’s personal server during her tenure as secretary.

Additionally, there are press reports that a federal public corruption investigation is on-going concerning conflicts of interest and abuse of official government office involving the financial "commitments" to the Clinton Foundation, speaking fees for President Clinton and former Secretary Clinton's official acts. President Clinton may be a target of that investigation.

Attorney General Lynch's meeting with President Clinton creates the appearance of a violation of law, ethical standards and good judgment. Attorney General Lynch’s decision to breach the well-defined ethical standards of the Department of Justice and the American legal profession is an outrageous abuse of the public's trust. Her conduct and statements undermine confidence in her ability to objectively investigate and prosecute possible violations of law associated with President Clinton and Secretary Clinton. This incident undermines the public's faith in the fair administration of justice. Simply stated, Attorney General Lynch’s June 29, 2016 meeting with former President Clinton creates the broad public impression that "the fix is in."

Judicial Watch requests your immediate and thorough investigation of the facts, circumstances, and appearances of ethical, regulatory and legal violations by Attorney General Lynch in connection with her meeting with former President William J. Clinton - and that you report your findings and recommendations to the American public.

Judicial Watch cites in its complaint 18 USC §§ 202 - 209; Executive Order 12674 on Principles of Ethical Conduct as amended by EO 12731; Uniform Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, 5 CFR Part 2635; Department of Justice regulations, 5 CFR Part 3801; Department of Justice regulations, 28 CFR Part 45; Executive branch standards of conduct, 5 USC § 735; and, United States Department of Justice Ethics Handbook for On and Off-Duty Conduct, 14 Principles for Ethical Conduct:

"14. Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that they are violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in this part. Whether particular circumstances create an appearance that the law or these standards have been violated shall be determined from the perspective of a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts."

5 C.F.R 2635.101 (b)

"An employee shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that the employee is violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in this part."

5 CFR 2635.101(b)(14)

"Attorney General Loretta Lynch's meeting with Bill Clinton severely undermined the already low public confidence in her agency's criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton," stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "In addition to this IG investigation, Judicial Watch has already sent Freedom of Information Act requests about this scandalous meeting."

[Fester Chugabrew]

Well, I’m sure the DOJ will kowtow to Judicial Watch’s every desire.

[Ann Archy]

Democrats are LAW-LESS because Republicans are BALL-LESS!!

[CincyRichieRich]

I hope the FBI starts leaking things.

Of course our public is so stupid they’ll blame the FBIinstrad of Clinton or Lynch.

[Old Yeller]

Slick wasn’t there to protect the she devil. He was there to protect his own ass because of his involvement with the payments to the Clinton foundation.

[Trumpinator]

Related: Judicial Watch is of course an avowedly conservative organization, but their work on the HRC email issue has been above board.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016

Is there a partisan element? Yes. But equally, liberal orgs have no interest in transparency/accountability pertaining to the Clintons.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016

The Lynch/Clinton meeting may have violated the DOJ's own ethics rules. This isn't simply a matter of "optics." https://t.co/JtNdVIRWNI— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016

[Trumpinator]

Lynch stating that the Clinton meeting has "cast a shadow over how this case may be perceived" sounds like an admission of an ethical lapse— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016

DOJ officials are barred from taking acts which may "cast" just such a "shadow," and Lynch now admits that the shadow has been cast.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016