Posted on 06/30/2016 4:04:22 PM PDT by safetysign
Department of Justice officials filed a motion in federal court late Wednesday seeking a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a closely allied public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
27 months? Why not just seal and file under “MORE CLINTON BULLS**T” and mothball them for another 50 years?
This was red meat for talking heads over at CNN and MSNBC!
Maddow and Stephanopolus were going ballistic over "The usual lack of transparency from the 0bama administration" and "Monkey business involving the Clintons!"
/s
They won’t have to....those e-mails are in quite a few peoples’ hands now....
A nation.. if the 'terrorists' in the DNC win.
I would not be surprised!
Maybe this is a coded message to the press that HERE is where to focus, on the CLINTON Charity frauds.
The DOJ lawyers and the Judge might be given instructions to just LOOK like they want to stop investigators from looking there.
With this being the ONLY pre-election focus, Obama wlll not get dirtied, along with his puppetmasters.
And the Lynch/Bubba meeting might have been to warn him of this new turn of events.
Bill COULD have been promised a pardon for both him and Hildabeast after Bernie, and IF and ONLY IF Bernie gets elected.
C. Edmund Wright, I haven’t heard from you in a while; what’s your insight into this?
In my always-optimistic dreamings I was hoping that the meeting was a warning to BJ Clinton that an indictment of Hitlery was imminent. The corruption goes too deep within the elite apparatus. I was wrong again.
If the justice department does not press for the very obvious misuse to the point of possible espionage or treason because she was teaching her subordinates how to by-pass the security systems, then they are not doing the job. Maybe its time to sue the government and make sure it hits the papers.
THE MONEY QUOTE--- If you are injured by a government agency, you may be able to sue under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Historically, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, you were not permitted to sue the king. Sovereign immunity has carried over to modern times in the form of a general rule that you cannot sue the government unless the government says you can. Fortunately, the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) allows certain kinds of lawsuits against federal employees who are acting within the scope of their employment. And not doing their job to protect the US from high crimes and misdemeaners is one of them,
If you believe you may have a claim for negligence (careless conduct, or other wrongful or tortious conduct) against a federal agency or employee, you must first determine whether you can sue the federal government under the FTCA. Although the limitations and exceptions are too numerous to review in this article, here are some general guidelines regarding the limitations on FTCA claims:
Only federal employees can be sued under the FTCA, not independent contractors hired by the federal government (unless they are treated like employees).
The negligent or wrongful conduct must have been done within the scope of the defendants employment.
In general, only claims of negligence as opposed to intentional misconduct are allowed (though some claims for intentional misconduct can be brought against certain federal law enforcement officers).
The claim must be based on and permitted by the law of the state in which the misconduct occurred.
Despite these and numerous other limitations on FTCA lawsuits, the federal government still pays out millions of dollars each year to compensate FTCA claims. Maybe it will get someones attention. And Ill bet I can find at least one hundred lawyers and a number of organizations that would like to get a piece of Uncle Sugar. Maybe its time.
I tried to find the 'reason for the delay request' but failed. What reason is being offered?
Interesting idea. Yes, she has to be replaced for sure and it could be done with less collateral damage if focus is on her money- grubbing rather than her as a danger to national security. I still think she will be persuaded to step aside due to her obvious bad health problems. That way, zero collateral damage. Everyone gets sick, even presumably wicked witches
We’ll know if Hill leaves town. I think 0 will pardon her. Democrats are above the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.