Not totally unexpected, given the vagueness of Virginia's public corruption laws at the time--and the fact that past governors (including Tim Kaine) also accepted gifts while in office. What was surprising was SCOTUS's unanimous decision to vacate the conviction, giving some idea of what the justices thought of the original case, the jury's decision and the affirmation of McDonnell's conviction by the 4th Circuit.
Unclear if Obama Justice Department will go ahead with a retrial or simply drop the charges.
To: ExNewsExSpook
The title says it all. Makes it more difficult to obtain corruption charges against elected officials. They can use this decision to their own personal advantage.
2 posted on
06/27/2016 7:47:45 AM PDT by
ZULU
(Donald Trump is the biggest threat to the New World Order since Barry Goldwater)
To: ExNewsExSpook
The democrats got their way: Virginia went blue that year and a fairly popular governor was taken out of the running for future public office. I hope this ruling changes McDonnell’s future. I’ll vote for him again.
3 posted on
06/27/2016 7:47:48 AM PDT by
HokieMom
(Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
To: ExNewsExSpook
It is difficult to fault unanimous decisions.
4 posted on
06/27/2016 7:48:27 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: ExNewsExSpook
I am of two minds on this Is this just another example of two standards of justice, one for the elites and one for the rest of us? Can we expect similar treatment for Hillary?
Or is this a case of justice being applied inappropriately on a partisan basis?
5 posted on
06/27/2016 7:48:27 AM PDT by
kabar
To: ExNewsExSpook
Yep, Court throws out the democrats trumped up charges against McDonnell. Of course the charges served their purpose, they tainted McDonnell and his successor enough for Clinton shill Terry McCauliff (who ironically is now also under federal investigation) to get elected.
6 posted on
06/27/2016 7:49:24 AM PDT by
apillar
To: ExNewsExSpook
Hillary, call on line one. Please pick up on the red courtesy phone.......................
12 posted on
06/27/2016 7:57:05 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
To: ExNewsExSpook
I wish BobMac had taken one for the team
16 posted on
06/27/2016 7:58:58 AM PDT by
Lisbon1940
(No full-term Governors)
To: ExNewsExSpook
Rat poison to exterminate those that brought the charges is required.
17 posted on
06/27/2016 8:05:22 AM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
To: ExNewsExSpook
Where does he go to get his reputation back?
22 posted on
06/27/2016 8:12:50 AM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: ExNewsExSpook
I have said all along that his problem was not that he was on the take. His problem was he didn’t take ENOUGH.
27 posted on
06/27/2016 8:48:43 AM PDT by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: ExNewsExSpook
Establishment wins again. Damaged the GOP brand in Virginia just enough to put McAuliffe over the top in an extremely tight race against Cuccinelli, and now with the conviction vacated, it becomes more difficult to prosecute political corruption.
34 posted on
06/27/2016 9:49:42 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Wisdom is doing due diligence before forming an opinion)
To: ExNewsExSpook
36 posted on
06/27/2016 9:53:57 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
To: ExNewsExSpook
Compare the quid pro quo in this case with the hundreds of millions of the Clinton Crime Family escapades. What’s the FBI’s excuse for the no action.
37 posted on
06/27/2016 10:28:44 AM PDT by
ReleaseTheHounds
("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
To: ExNewsExSpook
The federal prosecutor in this case, Dana J. Boente is a 32 year veteran of the Justice Department. He originally was hired at DOJ during the Reagan Administration, in 1984.
In his opinion, Chief Justice Roberts said: “There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Governments boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute” .
“A more limited interpretation of the term ‘official act’ leaves ample room for prosecuting corruption, while comporting with the text of the statute and the precedent of this Court.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson