Posted on 06/26/2016 10:18:03 AM PDT by PROCON
Four people were killed and at least 26 others have been wounded from Saturday morning through early Sunday across the city, police said.
Among the victims were a 19-year-old pregnant woman shot along with three friends in Morgan Park; a 55-year-old man killed at a party in East Garfield Park; and a man shot by another person as they sat together in a car in Edgewater Beach.
The Morgan Park attack occurred at 11:43 a.m. Saturday in the 1400 block of West 114th Place, said Officer Jose Estrada, a police spokesman.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
Guess they’re running behind in printing those “Gun Free Zone” signs.
I sure each shooter had a valid FOID and passed a background check.
The importance of not feeling disrespected.
All about “me”, no thought of community, etc.
The victim breakdown 2016:
75.7% black
18.8% Hispanic
5.5% white/other
slow night?
Slow night and really poor marksmanship.
Nobody has the courage to say that guns are not the problem. This doesn’t happen in other places that have lots of guns, only in predominantly black areas.
Hometown to Ayatollah Hussein Ob Ama Al Chi Cago?
In a gun free zone, without their body guards and at night, just to make it real.
Just this week on FB a libtard blamed Indiana for the gun violence in Chicago . He said it was too easy to get guns there and bring them to Chi town !
Yup, libtards get their bogus talking points and run with them ad nauseum.
With around 300 murders so far, that means there are just 15 white victims.
And Chicago is approximately, 1/3 black, 1/3 hispanic, 1/3 White. The murder rate for whites in Chicago is approximately the same as it is in any part of the country.
good thing Chicago has the strictest of gun control laws = just think how bad it could get ...
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Chicago-Violence-Shootings-Weekend-Summer-Homicide-Police-384443651.html
Now liberal anti-gun folk, while bemoaning the tragedy of all those killed and wounded, would probably say the marksmanship was exemplary simply because the shooters didn’t shoot to kill but tried to wound without killing.
It’s the old ‘why dont the cops shoot the guns out of the hands of villains theory’ of stupid people who grew up watching the Lone Ranger do that.
villain: “Ow, my hand!”
Tonto: “Um. Good shot, Kemo Sabe.”
I never heard anyone say “shoot to wound.”
Poor weapons,weak tactics,or bad marksmanship.
Liberals say it all the time. The morons seem to think that a policeman in a shooting incident should never shoot to kill because they think it is easy to shoot to wound or disable instead.
I can only attribute these delusions to movies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.