“MOs have MOs, especially true terrorism (conspiracy by a group, not individual action, like Orlando.)
Huh? So you’re suggesting Orlando wasn’t terrorism, just a lone nut with a gun? Have you even been following the story? Do you even understand how ISIS recruits and operates? Did you read the transcripts of his 911 calls from inside the club?
The first part of the quoted excerpt from your comment doesn’t even make any sense. “MOs have MOs” ??
Modus operandis have modus operandis?
“Did you read the transcripts of his 911 calls from inside the club?”
I put “heavily edited” immediately before “transcript” when referring to this incident because, while Big Media eventually removed the redactions, they substituted “God” for “allah”.
The leftist baby killers taught me that trick.
Moslems have MOs.
I understand very much.
Terrorism classically requires a web of conspiracy. If this guy was doing it essentially alone (maybe his wife), yes, it’s “just” mass murder.
Until you link these guys specifically to ISIS (or others), what they SAY on calls makes no difference. They are mass murderers, WITH THE MOTIVE OF ISLAM.
Why we so desperately need to say it’s strictly “terror” I don’t know. Watch it, because if you call this terror, libs will call all the white-guy mass murderers “terrorists” too, and bring out how they were “gun” terrorists, or “white supremecist” terrorists, or “Christian” terrorists. All “inspired” by something - naturally - as this guy was by Islam.