1 posted on
06/13/2016 8:53:08 AM PDT by
Lockbox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Republic
2 posted on
06/13/2016 8:54:48 AM PDT by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: Lockbox
Radar indicated high speed explosion. The center fuel tank explosion would have been a low speed explosion.
To: Lockbox
I was working and living in Brooklyn and still have copies of the papers with pictures of the rocket trail going up to the airplane.
Hundreds of partiers were taking beach photos when it happened and there were dozens if not a hundred photos of the event.
But Clinton shut down the press, and they willingly bought into the lie. And New Yorkers who know about the lie will still vote for Hillary.
4 posted on
06/13/2016 8:57:11 AM PDT by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: Lockbox
It has always been my belief that the Clintons covered up the real reason it was destroyed to keep from having to explain it during an election year. Just like Benghazi....................
5 posted on
06/13/2016 8:57:35 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
To: Lockbox
Back at the time the speculation was an errant missile from a U.S. Navy ship conducting exercises in the area that night.
Then the speculation changed to a MANPADS launched from a fast boat.
We know it wasn’t the center fuel tank. And we know that at the time of explosion TWA800 was higher than the effective altitude of MANPADS missiles.
So then where did the missile come from? Are we back to a U.S. Navy accident and subsequent Clinton Administration cover-up?
6 posted on
06/13/2016 8:58:23 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Lockbox
Well, another of the overwhelming number of cases where the US Government is responsible for killing citizens and lies to the American people about it.
7 posted on
06/13/2016 8:59:25 AM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(America, a Rule of Mob nation)
To: Lockbox
What, Hillary and Obama would cover up stuff? No way, just listen to Obama regarding the terror shootings, he never covers up for Islamic terrorists. If he did, he would never mention Islamic terrorists and attempt to misdirect, like perhaps blaming guns for Islamic Terror.
8 posted on
06/13/2016 9:00:54 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: Lockbox
50 state landslide for Trump if this gets recognizef as a Clinton cover-up of a terrorist attack.
11 posted on
06/13/2016 9:02:04 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Nation States seem to be ending. The follow-on should not be Globalism, but Localism.)
To: Lockbox
Something like well over a hundred people witnessed a missile. Many witnesses were former military and pilots.
So later discussions over whether or not a missile could have reached the plane were an evasion. People saw it. And the interesting thing about that is that many reported that FBI did not want to talk to them.
12 posted on
06/13/2016 9:02:18 AM PDT by
marron
To: Lockbox
13 posted on
06/13/2016 9:05:05 AM PDT by
Pelham
(Islam vs the Free World in a death match)
To: Lockbox
17 posted on
06/13/2016 9:07:33 AM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(<<<<<<< he no longer IS my 'teddy bear'.)
To: LS
18 posted on
06/13/2016 9:07:37 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Chuck Norris finally met his match in Donald Trump.)
To: Lockbox
If a navy ship fired a missile at that aircraft the entire crew of the ship would surely know, and I find it impossible to believe that not one member of that ships crew would say anything.
19 posted on
06/13/2016 9:08:11 AM PDT by
VR-21
To: Lockbox
The Clinton's learned a great deal from the laughable cover up of Vince Foster's murder.
20 posted on
06/13/2016 9:08:36 AM PDT by
immadashell
(Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
To: maggief; hoosiermama
23 posted on
06/13/2016 9:10:33 AM PDT by
Jane Long
(Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
To: Lockbox
This is why I still wonder did the terrorists get their hands on the Russian 9K33 Osa (NATO code name SA-8
Gecko) SAM system and jury-rigged a SAM launcher (complete with radar) that could fit into a larger pleasure boat? Remember, the Soviets supplied a large number of 9K33 systems to Soviet client states in the Middle East during the late 1970's to early 1980's and many of them may have ended up in terrorist hands.
The 9K33 system could certainly shoot down TWA Flight 800, given the maximum engagement altitude of the missile is nearly 40,000 feet; that puts it well within the range of the 747 at the time it exploded.
24 posted on
06/13/2016 9:10:45 AM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
To: Lockbox
26 posted on
06/13/2016 9:10:51 AM PDT by
Batman11
( All Muslims are not terrorists, but almost all terrorists are Muslim!)
To: Lockbox
Thanks, will come back later to see if anything is added.
29 posted on
06/13/2016 9:13:11 AM PDT by
3D-JOY
(Visit the FREEPATHON today!)
30 posted on
06/13/2016 9:14:48 AM PDT by
PMAS
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
To: Lockbox
It will be good for all when the TWA Flt 800's truth is finally made public.
One truth will lead to another and another and, with a little Divine Luck and Fate's assistance, soon we'll have an avalanche of long-suppressed truth that no one can stop.
35 posted on
06/13/2016 9:20:44 AM PDT by
GBA
(Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson