Posted on 06/09/2016 10:33:44 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
The death certificate for the father of the controversial Mexican judge confirms that Curiels parents were not U.S. citizens when he was born.
Death records from Indiana records confirm that Salvador Curiel died a Mexican citizen in 1964 not as the New York Timess Alan Rappeport reported in an anti-Donald Trump article.
But Rappeport claimed that the elder Curiel had died a U.S. citizen. He didnt.
Heres what Rappeport wrote:
Judge Curiel, 62, was born in East Chicago, Ind., to parents who had emigrated from Mexico. Raul Curiel said their father, Salvador, arrived in Arizona as a laborer in the 1920s, eventually receiving citizenship and becoming a steelworker. Their parents were married in Mexico in 1946, and their mother, Francisca, became a citizen after joining her husband in the United States.
In fact Salvador Curiel never received U.S. citizenship and Francisca became a citizen in 1969five years after her husband died and 18 years after her last son the future judge Gonzalo Curiel was born.
So the New York Times got it wrong. They didnt do their fact checking. Oops.
Could the fact that Mexican telecom billionaire Carlos Slims ownership of The New York Times have played a role?
(Excerpt) Read more at gotnews.com ...
==============================================
THE FACTS ARE THESE Judge Curiel, 62, was born in East Chicago, Ind., to parents who had emigrated from Mexico. Raul Curiel said their father, Salvador, arrived in Arizona as a laborer in the 1920s, eventually receiving citizenship and becoming a steelworker.
Their parents were married in Mexico in 1946, and their mother, Francisca, became a citizen after joining her husband in the United States.
In fact Salvador Curiel never received U.S. citizenship and Francisca became a citizen in 1969five years after her husband died and 18 years after her last son the future judge Gonzalo Curiel was born.
So realistic, even has chemtrails....
Good analysis!
I’m Looking for the link for this:
“Francisca became a citizen in 1969”
Trump gets in their OODA loop
Diversionary tactics
being always unpredictable
MSM at checkers while Trump plays chess.
The thing is ...Hillary is supposed to be the expert on Saul Alyinsky....she corresponded with him and wrote her (hidden) masters thesis on the Alyinsky rules.
Trump is using Alinsky Rules No 12 and 5 against Hillery with devastating effect.
Trump Rules.
There is also a rule in Cybernetics that the controlling system must be as lease as complex as the system being controlled.
That's why central planning and communism will never work>
Islamics and Communists unite to cut off Adam Smith's invisible hand.
The first debate. Dr BEN mentioned Alinsky
Immediately following Trump completely handled a question in the Alinsky style Carson was grinning like a Chelshire Cat.
Those who know the techniques know he not only know but has mastered them
Needs repeating again and again and again until the world knows.
I'm really shocked Prince Rhesus didn't give him the RNC nom.
bkmk
You are wrong. It is NOT a "minor issue". The so-called 'birthright citizenship' is a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment. Legally, Gonzalo Curiel is NOT even a U.S. citizen and is illegally acting as a U.S. District Judge.
You are right about anchor babies and birthright, but getting into the judge’s parents citizenship is to get distracted by something peripheral that no one in today’s electorate has any understanding of. Stick to what they understand—illegals, trade, jobs, taxes. Biased judge, La Raza. Don’t get birther about the judge’s parents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.