Posted on 06/07/2016 10:53:41 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
There is currently no indication that Muslim UCLA shooter Mainak Sarkar had any terrorist motives. Though his note has as yet of to be released. But of somewhat more interest is the question of why Sarkar was misidentified as a "white male".
One of the more obvious things about Maniak Sarkar is that he is not a white male. He can't be mistaken for a white male. But media coverage has prompted people to expect white male shooters.
It's a type of prejudice that we don't much talk about because it's a politically correct prejudice. It's a prejudice encouraged by the media. While Muslims certainly dominate terror statistics, there have been Muslim mass shooters carrying out attacks unrelated to terrorism.
The most prominent of these was the École Polytechnique Massacre carried out by a man popularly known as Marc Lepine, whose real name was Gamil Rodrigue Liass Gharbi. Gharbi shot nine women. Like Sarkar, the rationale was some combination of personal derangement and hostility toward women and people he blamed for his failures.
And yet Lepine continues to be misidentified in ways that lead people to assume that he was another white male shooter. Much like Sarkar was misidentified as a white male.
Beyond the obvious derangement of Islamic terrorism, Muslim societies are destabilized in ways that help spur violence even down the road among second generation immigrants. And yet the media is far more comfortable maintaining the stereotype of the white male shooter.
Agreed. And yet the utter stupidity and blindness of the narrative maintainers, most of them white liberals, is shocking, since their triumph in convincing a majority of the so-called oppressed that white people are demons worthy of death will also mean their own deaths. Really, what are they thinking (if at all)?-—that once the bloodletting begins they’ll pack their bags and leave or carry signs identifying themselves as “accidentally white”? In reality, they will not escape the evil they’ve been striving so hard to unleash on white people. The graves they are digging for others will become their own.
Is the author trying to claim that Indians (and Arabs) are not white? Indians are Caucasians, as are Arabs.
First time I heard he was a Moslem.
Part of the program of subjugating the West by activating barbarian nationalist wills to genocide white people.
It is to throw it out because they figure quite a few people will never hear the correction.
Most Muslims *are*, in fact, white. Or, if not white, they are dark Caucasians. The UCLA shooter looks like some sort of Asian.
It’s not the person’s race that matters, it is what is inside his head. Obviously, this guy had evil there.
Name a child maniac, er, maniak, and expect the best?
That’s interesting.
Because the MSM is filled with liars?
Sorry, but your source doesn’t appear exactly credible. The origin of this is apparently a student editor who got her information from everipedia, a source that can be edited by anonymous users. The killer’s sister-in-law says he was not Muslim.
If George Zimmerman can be identified as a “White Hispanic”...
I don’t understand how there was even a shooting at UCLA! Isn’t that a gun free zone?
If the cops jobs were sitting in their cruisers reading textbooks about racial types and sub-types, "Caucasian" might be important information. I think they need skin tone information for identification. I guess Trotsky and his ilk invented Cultural Marxism to describe me.
>>Why does the author think he’s Muslim? He’s Indian and his bio says he’s areligious.
That was my immediate question as well. Early commentary here on FR was that his name is typically Hindu.
Is this a serious question?
For the exact same reason that Zimmerman was listed as a ‘white hispanic’
I directly witnessed that myself. The source is accurate. Whether the source data was accurate is another question, but it clearly was changed as soon as people noticed it.
why was zimmerman
its the first and easy propaganda move to hide the fact the piece of garbage was a muslim
its part of the anti-white libtard effeminate agenda
the media is not there to report the news... is 24/7 pravda
Original thread:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3436148/posts
Now everipedia has this:
https://www.everipedia.com/mainak-sarkar/
Religion - None (areligious)
There is such a thing as race and nationality. However, the MSM narrative will change to suit their purposes. Thus, Curiel, whose appearance would not draw attention in Barcelona, is an oppressed Latino, while Zimmerman, who looks like the late Hugo Chavez, is an eeeeeeeeevil "white Hispanic".
What a silly question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.