Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TWA 800: The Great Untold Story of Our Time
American Thinker ^ | June 7, 2016 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 06/07/2016 5:18:37 PM PDT by Kaslin

On the pleasant summer evening of July 17, 1996, TWA Flight 800 left JFK Airport in New York bound for Paris. Twelve minutes after takeoff, about ten miles south of the popular south shore of Long Island, at least two surface-to-air missiles blew the 747 out of the sky, killing all 230 people on board.

I write the above with 100 percent confidence. I owe that confidence to the efforts of a small corps of committed individuals -- eyewitnesses, independent researchers, whistleblowers from within the investigation, and family members who have turned their grief into action. In attempting to get at the truth, at least three of these people were arrested, several others were thrown off the TWA 800 investigation, and every one of them was ridiculed.

In TWA 800: The Crash, The Cover-Up, The Conspiracy (Regnery: July 5), I get to tell their story, an epic one. What makes the story so compelling is that these everyday citizens have struggled against a Goliath that could not have been more powerful. The opposition includes, among other powers, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the FBI, and the CIA.

In a totalitarian country, authorities can suppress information at will. In America, the media have to collaborate in that suppression, and this they did, closing their eyes to the obvious and accepting without evidence the government’s unproven theory of a spontaneous fuel tank explosion.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cashill; coverup; foilwatch; jihadinamerica; twa800; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-206 next last
To: Kaslin

No, no, no - it was stirring the fuel tanks.

It happens all the time.

I know, because the government told me so.


121 posted on 06/08/2016 2:39:05 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

the “few Navy personnel” would supposedly include the 300 man crew of a Burke class DDG or 400 man crew of a Ticonderoga class CG. When a anti aircraft missile is
fired from these ships, everyone on that ship knows what just happened.


122 posted on 06/08/2016 3:21:13 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

I just can’t see every sailor remaining silent if that happened.


123 posted on 06/08/2016 3:30:44 AM PDT by OldNewYork (Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In America, the media have to collaborate in that suppression, and this they did, closing their eyes to the obvious and accepting without evidence the government’s unproven theory of a spontaneous fuel tank explosion.

Son of Mockingbird is alive and well apparently.

124 posted on 06/08/2016 3:35:12 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (If Trump loses, America dies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExNewsExSpook
Climbing against a night sky, with all engines operating above cruise power, the 747 would have presented a very good IR target.

Then you would have expected the missile to target one of the engines and not the fuselage.

125 posted on 06/08/2016 3:43:37 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: bootless
I think Jack had mentioned a Cherokee 6 or an Arrow - some six-seater single-engine (probably turbo’d) plane that could reach that 16,000-25,000 altitude. Packed with explosives to T-bone the 747.

Then wreckage of the Cherokee 6 or Arrow would have been found at the crash site. It wasn't.

126 posted on 06/08/2016 3:45:49 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
The Russians wee driven out of Afghanistan by Osama's minions using stingers, shoulder fired missiles, knocking soviet military aircraft out of the air.

At much lower altitudes than TWA 800.

127 posted on 06/08/2016 3:47:33 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
The crew of the Navy warship that allegedly buried Osama bin Laden at sea seems to be quite tight lipped. Not one cell phone snapshot or video has appeared. No one from the ship has given a statement regarding the burial.

Assuming that it really did happen, crew of the ship didn't bury him. A small number of people did.

128 posted on 06/08/2016 3:48:52 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Orbiter
I’ll repeat the gist of a comment I posted on FR years ago: there is no way in hell that aircraft departed for a transatlantic flight with an empty center fuel tank.

Sure they would. The distance between New York and Paris is about 3600 miles. A 747-100 fully fueled can fly 6100 miles. The airplane would carry enough fuel to make the trip with a safety margin but it's not going to haul fuel it doesn't need.

129 posted on 06/08/2016 3:55:22 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: darth
Questions?

One. How does a submerged submarine know what it's shooting at?

130 posted on 06/08/2016 3:56:59 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: PraiseTheLord
I recall something, that seems to have ?disappeared — someone was trying to give out information saying he was on a US submarine — I think secret, or its technology was, that BY MISTAKE fired missle/s from under the water near by. Like unknown that such tech was able to do that.

Weapons don't get fired by mistake, especially from submarines.

131 posted on 06/08/2016 3:58:52 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
I had heard that the U.S. Navy had been in the area with subs that were preforming war games and shot it down by accident.

How do you shoot a commercial airplane down by accident?

132 posted on 06/08/2016 4:08:38 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Haven't read thru all the responses, someone may have already mentioned this ... James Kallstrom the lead FBI agent in the investigation of TWA flight 800 initially had his team investigating the criminal or terrorist angle. Within a few days he was summoned to Washington, when he returned the direction of the investigation changed to the empty fuel tank explosion theory. All other evidence was ignored from that point forward. Did Kallstrom get his marching orders while in DC? One might think so ...
133 posted on 06/08/2016 4:10:33 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bootless

My uncle was lead mechanic for TWA (off that night) and says the center fuel tank was NOT the problem. He feels the truth will come out eventually. He says the navy divers know the score.


134 posted on 06/08/2016 4:21:03 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

Agree,
But to the tin-foil hat crowd, the absence of proof proves how good the conspiracy cover-up is.


135 posted on 06/08/2016 5:06:02 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

A missile launch rings the ship like a bell,
Everyone knows,


136 posted on 06/08/2016 5:07:16 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Because the missile plume would have burned out long before it reaches 5,000 feet and the missile is non-reflective and about 4’ long, and with no plume and no reflection and small, no way it could have been seen miles away,


137 posted on 06/08/2016 5:13:52 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: darth

I have one question.

Why are you hiding in anonymity if you know this for a fact?


138 posted on 06/08/2016 5:15:49 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

Missile plume burns out before 5.000 feet.
No vapor trails or plume.
Contrails from the jet, if anything.
I’ve been shot at by MANPAD over southern Iraq. I know what it looks like and how hard it is to see when you are in the jet being shot at, let alone being miles and miles away trying to see 4’ long non-reflective plumeless missile.


139 posted on 06/08/2016 5:31:34 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

Air defense artillery has come a long way since the stinger missile. There are plenty of arrows that could have reached that flight.


140 posted on 06/08/2016 5:44:03 AM PDT by Rocketwolf68 (Bring back the crusades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson