[Robert DeLong]

Of course if they were Muslim women then the Times would be extremely silent and say you are a racist if you complained.

[SJackson]

That’s true. But it this case it’s women. Could be Jewish women, Muslim, Mormon, Hindu. Any women. The New York Times, of course, views that as Jewess Privledge.

[Jamestown1630]

I wonder if the editors of the Times are concerned about Muslim foot-baths in University bathrooms....

-JT

[ErikJohnsky]

precisely. Also, liberals tend to forget how only 10% of American Jews are orthodox Jews; 43% of Muslim women (per Pew, a liberal poll) wear the head garbage bag, I mean hijab.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Exactly. And this is ‘Hipster Williamsburg’. *snort*

[reg45]

Ditto

[SkyDancer]

Beat me to it. It’s the continuing hatred of Jews.

[Skooz]

Of course if they were Muslim women then the Times would be extremely silent and say you are a racist if you complained.

Bingo.

Also, if it were billed as a lesbian event, the Times would applaud with glee.

[knarf]

My Filipina wife says that all the Filipinos say the muslims smell very bad

[tbw2]

Liberals are surprisingly silent on Europe adopting women’s only swimming hours and train cars - and not out of religious preference of the women but to protect them from rape and hands up their skirts by Muslim men.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Can the Muslim women prohibit Jewish women from swimming in the same pool? Are there not swimming hours specifically limited to Muslims, prohibiting ALL others fromentering?

Or does the NY Times only discriminate against those religions it discriminates against?

[JimRed]

Of course if they were Muslim women then the Times would be extremely silent and say you are a racist if you complained.

The way the Times whines about it you'd think that it only applied to Jewish women. What about Muslim women, Catholic nuns and lesbians who'd also prefer a male-free environment while swimming?