Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is The Taliban Fixing To Invade America, Or Why Is Washington Still Killing People In Afghanistan?
David Stockman's Contra Corner ^ | May 22, 2016 | Michael S. Rozeff

Posted on 05/22/2016 8:53:51 PM PDT by thoughtomator

The Pentagon thinks it’s killed a Taliban official (Akhtar Mansour) by drone. But what difference does it make to us to kill this man (meaning a positive difference, a gain, a benefit)? Whether or not some outfit in Pakistan applauds this or hates it, what difference does it make to Americans? Why is the U.S. still trying to kill off Taliban or stop them? Why is the U.S. still in Afghanistan 15 years after it went there to get bin Laden? Why did the U.S. start a war with the Taliban anyway? The humongous cost of this killing is already $700 billion. When other costs are factored in, the cost will be 2 or 3 times that, or about $2 trillion. For what? What did we get out of it? What are we supposed to be getting out of this?

Hillary Clinton strongly supported the U.S. going more deeply into Afghanistan. Obama approved the surge she supported. He’s had 7 years to end the war and he didn’t.

Hillary Clinton is an idiot. An official like her who bases decisions on anecdotes, emotions, images, and biases is an idiot and dangerous to boot. This is Hillary:

“It’s clear that if I had been president, we would have never diverted our attention from Afghanistan. When I went to Afghanistan the first time and was met by a young soldier from New York, in the 10th Mountain Division who told me that I was welcomed to the forgotten front lines in the war against terror, that just struck me so forcefully.” For God’s sake, is this how she’ll make decisions if elected? If she had sound instincts in foreign affairs, this kind of emotional basis for forming policy might be negated, but there is no evidence at all that she does.

(Excerpt) Read more at davidstockmanscontracorner.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; afghanistan; clinton; election2016; newyork; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: thoughtomator

that’s cause we actually fought to win back then....now, not so much, no very pc to put your enemy out of our misery....


21 posted on 05/23/2016 4:34:52 AM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

-—If she had sound instincts in foreign affairs, this kind of emotional basis for forming policy might be negated, but there is no evidence at all that she does.-—

Unfortunately half the electorate makes decisions based on emotion as well.


22 posted on 05/23/2016 4:53:08 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
The text on the photos, while true, is deceitful and deliberately ignores Afghanistan history. This is like taking a photo of the beautiful American South in 1860, and another of the same area destroyed in 1865, and titling the photos "Before Slaves Freed", "After Slaves Freed". While the text is true, the impression given is false, implying the freed slaves did the damage.

Between the photos these events happened: communist president, Soviet invasion, local resistance, US arms rebels, some funds go via Pakistan, Pakistan arms and funds Pakastani Taliban, stinger missles drive Soviets out, civil war breaks out in Afghanistan (this is what likely caused the damage), Taliban welcomed to end civil war. Now I'm in no way supporting the Taliban, but the reality is that the destruction had already happened by the time Taliban took over.

The wording on the second photo could also read "After Afghanistan Civil War", "Result of Soviet Invasion", "Result of US Abandoning Afghanistan", "Result of Cold War".

In a very real sense, stupid US policy is responsible for resurgence of radical Islam and jihadism, including the Taliban. It's humbling and raises the question "What stupid things are being done in foreign affairs right now?"

23 posted on 05/23/2016 4:55:24 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

The difference between WW2 and now is the people. in WW2 the people were forced to fight and gladly went home once the leaders were killed.

In Afghanistan and surrounding countries each individual WANTS to fight and die for Mohammad.


24 posted on 05/23/2016 4:59:29 AM PDT by oldasrocks (They should lock all of you up and only let out us properly medicated people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

Good point, we were fighting countries, now, regardless of how most of the left feels, we are fighting a quasi religion.


25 posted on 05/23/2016 5:05:58 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
It was stupid to ever invade Afghanistan. It’s impossible to successfully invade that country. From Alexander the Great, to the British Empire, to the Soviet Union, it;s never going to work.

We face the same problem in Afghanistan that we faced in South Vietnam: we cannot defeat an enemy who has the advantage of an inviolable sanctuary to retreat to, where his women and children can find refuge, and from which he can obtain training and supplies.

In the case of Afghanistan, that refuge is Pakistan, particularly the Tribal Areas.

But you are wrong about not being able to conquer an area. The solution for a people who just won't stop fighting you, is to exterminate them completely, and repopulate the area with your own people.

26 posted on 05/23/2016 5:13:18 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
These cave dwelling barbarians have little ability/capability/logistics to hit America. Billions upon billions being spent over there in the cesspool of the world when we could use this same $$$ to strengthen our borders, coast guard, air defenses, internal security.

Good grief! I'm all for taking out terrorist, but decades lingering in these countries...what's the strategery?

27 posted on 05/23/2016 5:48:21 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

Bingo


28 posted on 05/23/2016 6:18:17 AM PDT by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Fixing to invade America?

FIXING TO?

How many times do I have to tell you people, it's "Fixin' to."

Jeez... [facepalm]

29 posted on 05/23/2016 6:22:49 AM PDT by OKSooner (Hillary will never make it to the convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Gotta fight ‘em over there so we don’t have to fight them over here. That was the prevailing logic for this whole fiasco.


30 posted on 05/23/2016 6:26:32 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Yes, but we could have taken out or greatly degraded the Taliban and then left. Instead we decided to do “nation building” which is a waste of time in Afghanistan and places like it.


31 posted on 05/23/2016 6:26:43 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
No. They have already invaded America. Courtesy of the State Department.
32 posted on 05/23/2016 6:32:42 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

No, it’s, “fittin’ to.”


33 posted on 05/23/2016 7:22:03 AM PDT by ebshumidors
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf; Lorianne

>One thing about both Bush 41 and Bush 43 - when they drew a line in the sand, they followed through unlike the inept obama and his ridiculous “ redline” in Syria that drew a false flag attack and a loss of credibility

Wait. You mean the same that came out with the whole ‘Religion of Peace’ non-sense, that flew out the Saudis+ right after 911, went to war w/ the least troublesome in the region (instead of those that fostered terrorism...aka S.A.), gave *US* the NSA/TSA...but no profiling, said ‘the war would be paid for’ (sure it was, by We the People), gave us some of the most F*-up ROE, etc.?

Followed-through? OK, maybe. ‘In it to win it’? Never.


34 posted on 05/23/2016 7:56:44 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Bush 41 kept Saddam in power, did he not think that Saddam would inevitably plot his revenge?


35 posted on 05/23/2016 7:57:42 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Any idea what year that top photo (the two girls) was taken?


36 posted on 05/23/2016 8:00:57 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

>Bush 41 kept Saddam in power, did he not think that Saddam would inevitably plot his revenge?

Yes. He was SUCH a *problem* in the 1st Gulf War.... /s

What ‘revenge’? More like Libya...more BS than anything; *rattle sabers*, swap here, swat here, *rattle sabers*, repeat.

It sure wasn’t like the Saudi’s are doing/been doing. Nor did *we* take it to those whom deserved (too much hand-holding and kissing going on).


37 posted on 05/23/2016 9:21:32 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

1970

I wanted to go there then. The family put a stop to it.

I wanted to see the big buddhas.


38 posted on 05/23/2016 10:21:34 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Why? What difference does it make? Thugs in the WH, war on drugs, war on terror...Soetero is in league with the M-B-Hood, Sinaloa and the homosexual agenda amongst others...illegals getting free stuff from American’s. We’re all slaves now. Makes a big difference, divide and conquer.


39 posted on 05/23/2016 9:59:17 PM PDT by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

“How many decades have we had bases in Japan and Germany?”

3 decades too long.

Next question.

L


40 posted on 05/23/2016 10:03:31 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson