Posted on 05/21/2016 4:15:24 PM PDT by Syncro
By
Published May 20, 2016
I’ve predicted publicly for a year now that Hillary Clinton, although a prohibitive favorite, still may never become the Democratic Party’s nominee.
...barely squeaked by in Kentucky. Bernie has now won 11 of the last 14 primaries and caucuses.
I ask Democrats, is this your nominee? The winner of your presidential nomination has lost just shy of 80 percent of her races coming down the homestretch.
Call me crazy but don't presumptive nominees usually win about 80 percent of their races? This has to be the first time in history the leader of her party has lost 80 percent of them. I'm not sure you call someone like that a "leader" or "nominee." Usually you call someone like that..."loser!"
Hillary is certainly still the favorite -- if only because of the scam of superdelegates. The Democratic nomination is basically rigged. Because of those superdelegates Hillary already has the nomination locked up. But she appears to be crawling on her knees, over razor blades, towards the finish line.
First, while she’s the clear-cut delegate winner and we all know that everyone loves a winner, it’s gotta be downright frightening for Democrats that she still can’t put away a wild-eyed radical socialist ...
Turns out the FBI doesn’t do “security inquiries.” Hillary is the subject of a “criminal investigation.”
Then there’s that millstone hanging around Hillary’s neck -- Bill Clinton.
The stories about Bill’s reckless and possibly criminal behavior keep popping out of the closet. First there’s the beautiful blonde
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Gosh, that would be simply awful. But, humanitarian that I am, I would pass out razor blades.
@WayneRoot Popular on FR dot com https://t.co/r17CiyMjZ9
Good discussion Mr WAR— Slip Stream News (@GaryZPon) May 22, 2016
Do you really think that is going to matter?
I think she will be replaced but because she has an affair with Huma? Not likely.
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY A-24 September Term 2002
It was done within the time frame established within the State's laws.
Though this, even though you left it out, was interesting...
Late in an increasingly competitive race against Republican Doug Forrester in 2002, Torricelli suddenly withdrew after disclosure of illegal contributions to his campaign by David Chang, a businessman connected to North Korea.[10] Torricelli had previously denied this and a number of other charges.
The Dumbocrats had no choice but to replace him or lose the election completely if he stayed in.
I used to think that this scenario was purest moonshine, but now I'm not so sure. Nevertheless, the Dems are running out of time if they're going to pull the old switcheroo. It's nearly June.
I still see her running but I don't see her running well. This woman has never actually faced real heat in the media and is obviously very uncomfortable dealing with it and transparent in dodging it. Trump can afford to tell them to go to hell, and he has, repeatedly, because it's part of his approach. She can't, because if she tries it they'll eat her alive. Only an extraordinary amount of smoke, misrepresentation, and downright complicity has kept her afloat so far.
The author is in a better position than I to judge just how much 0bama really is the "leader" of the Democrat party, but I don't see much sign of that, to be candid. He isn't, after all, going to be the one left holding the bag when, haste the day, the new President is sworn in. He'll be out of there and looking for tee times and a fat book deal to launder a few of Soros' millions in his direction. He could give a rip what happens to the Dems after that. And from what I can see, the feeling is mutual.
Red Zeppelin
The CA DemonCrap primary will be great to watch. She might just get Berned there.
She has it fixed where she can exert her electoral majority on Nov. 8. Everything before that is window dressing. I would imagine Mr. Bill will start taking a more visible role if it is determine that many now have begun to dislike Mrs. Bill.
If this were today, Torricelli could have stayed in the race and Gardeners would have cheered him.
I believe she would choose jail over giving up on the presidential nomination.
That is what I mean. That was not a Democrat election. That was the general. Democrat NJ Supreme Court ruled that deadlines and election laws do not matter and can be changed at will. Precedent for them to throw Hillary under the bus any time up to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.
Will they> Hell yes. If they think she is going to lose big. Or nObama decides to indict.
Just saying.
Trump doesn’t see anything wrong with it either. It doesn’t matter to him - that is his own words.
Me too, and it is coming down to the wire.
If the dems see that it’s not gonna work to get Hillary in there, they may pull something like Root describes.
It looks like if her feet are held to the fire and she HAS to come clean on some things, she could very well go down.
She really has no good answers to all of the questions that could come here way.
And it looks like Trump will pull no punches.
You nailed it with “extraordinary amount of smoke, misrepresentation, and downright complicity” is dogging her Campaign.
About Obama in your last paragraph, that all makes sense.
He will probably skate, thumbing his nose at everyone.
(Except Valerie Jarrett-his puppet master-and the Muslim Brotherhood)
He seems to have a thicker coat of Teflon than Mrs. Bill Clinton.
It’s that anchor, Obummer, tied around her neck.
You must have been waiting 8 years to write that laughable crap.
It won’t work. Each state is responsible for election laws and each state would have to agree to the change. One state is easy, but all 50 are not. Try again.
All the Bushes are going to have to endorse Mrs. Bill to keep her afloat!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.