Trump sees the integrity of the Supreme Court at stake: Trump recently released a list of his potential Supreme Court nominees; he called on Clinton to do the same. He suggested the contrast between the Trump / Clinton SCOTUS appointments would be 180 degrees.
Jeff Sessions stated that in essence Clinton could rescind the 2nd Amendment by appointing justices who would reverse the Heller decision. Therefore, Donald Trump's claim that 'Clinton wants to rescind the 2nd Amendment' is true. Clinton would underhandedly accomplish the goal by destroying the integrity of the Supreme Court.
Rick Perry stated that if you're a person that cherishes the Second Amendment or a person who loves Constitution, "Donald Trump's your man." IMHO, It's so obvious, any NRA member that votes for Hillary needs to have his head examined and deserves to be the first to lose his right to bear arms.
To paraphrase Lincoln:
I like this Trump - He fights.
Hmmm. So it’s called “going after” someone that wants to further infringe on a supposed guaranteed right? Odd eh? How about we back off all the current ‘infringements’ for a start?
Her answers are interesting...because they are non answers. Come Hillary...tell us how you’re going to stop this killing. By making sure they have playgrounds, a vegie lunch??
Trump is such a refreshing change from the crooked pansies of the GOPe. No wonder they hate him. Especially LOSERS like Romney and the rest of them. We know who they are.
from the article :
“If Hillary Clinton gets the opportunity to replace Antonin Scalia with an anti-gun Supreme Court justice, we will lose the individual right to keep a gun in the home for self-defense,” Cox said.
“If Hillary Clinton gets the opportunity to replace Antonin Scalia...”
She will appoint a ‘transgender’ freak (preferably) a handicapped America-Hating, Moslem!
GRRR!
Damn but she is dumb. Pretty much by definition you cannot prevent senseless acts. Doesn't matter if it is related to gun violence or teenagers trying to skateboard off the porch roof into the pool. People are going to commit senseless acts, period. You cannot prevent that without some fascist utopia of regulating all human behavior. Unless you explicitly list everything that is allowed, and everything that is banned, people are going to do stupid s**t. Even then, people are still going to do stupid stuff and criminals are still going to disregard laws. ergo, you can't legislate us into safety from violence. We can only be prepared to defend ourselves and make violence an unattractive option.
Also by definition, anything the government does that in any way involves restricting citizens' access to firearms is on very questionable ground. The 2nd Amendment is pretty clear on that: shall not be infringed. Anything that is an infringement - background checks, taxes, magazine capacity limits, feature restrictions, feature requirements (eg. smart guns) - any of it is in some way an infringement and thus unconstitutional.
Mr. Trump has got to send this witch packing. I shudder to imaghine the SCOTUS picks she will make.
The lying tramp has spoken warmly about the mandatory Australian gun “buyback” (as if the government was buying back a product it sold). That means ONLY one thing: effective confiscation.
F#%& you, you lying, thieving, tyrannical, Leftist bitch!
Oh, and F#%& the idiot #NeverTrump asswipes who will sit on their hands (at best) and allow this beast to destroy our 2nd Amendment rights...for starters.
For the #NeverTrump idiots:
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
Samuel Adams
“In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns.”-— Hillary Clinton, last October
Of course Crooked Hillary had to lie about that, calling a massive gun confiscation a “buyback”. The offer was an offer Australians couldn’t refuse, unless they wanted to go to prison. Something she want’s to emulate.
I’m just throwing this out there because I think it is bound to come up. I don’t think it’s a huge deal, but I think it is worth knowing with respect to Trump on 2nd Amendment. The big donor, Sheldon Adelson, that just announced endorsement, has also been a big contributor to Freedom’s Watch. They appear to be pretty conservative on the issues they have listed on their website. But, they specifically call for firearm registration. Trump is still the winner on this issue when compared to Hillary. Just something to keep an eye on.
crooked Hillary is trying to deny it, but she is on record at a donors only fundraiser saying: “the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lP3wjxJwlk
I didn’t vote for Trump in my State’s primary ... but I’m way over it. Forward to demolish She Who Must Be Crushed.
Trump is going after the “monster vote,” that gigantic bloc who formerly stayed home because neither side spoke for them. If he succeeds, along with awakening democrats like union workers, we may see an electoral tsunami.
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights is OURS! It is not owned by the Government nor the Supreme Court and if they try to take our God-given rights away from us we have no choice but CW2 to make them understand who is the boss.