Skip to comments.
Hillary's Support Among Democrats Fades As Party Crisis Looms (Rat high drama alert)
Investor's Business Daily ^
| May 18, 2016
Posted on 05/18/2016 10:39:29 PM PDT by Zakeet
Party Politics: Every day there are stories about how deeply troubled the Republican Party is with Donald Trump as its presumptive candidate. But, if anything, the Democratic Party is in far worse shape.
Think about it. Democrats still can't decide if Hillary Clinton is electable - in fact, her support has diminished as the primary season has dragged on. There are fears of a party revolt by Bernie Sanders supporters at the July convention, and theres a huge rift forming between two of its major factions. Plus, polls show that the supposedly can't-possibly-win Donald Trump is now close to Clinton.
[Snip]
Meanwhile, the party is increasingly worried that Sanders supporters, feeling they had the nomination snatched from them by a rigged system, could stage damaging protests at the partys convention, after his supporters turned a Nevada state Democratic convention into a chaotic mess.
[Snip]
If that werent enough, a major fight has developed between two of the Democratic Partys most important constituencies - rich environmentalists and labor unions.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; clinton; clintongate; corruption; democrat; election2016; fighting; hillary; hillary2016; newyork; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: Utmost Certainty
There are some folks who came out of recent wars who may be impressive, especially if the SHTF.
21
posted on
05/19/2016 12:23:06 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: 867V309
The Dem party doesn’t really belong to either Obama or Clinton. It’s a vehicle for the accumulation & effectuation of power, and this is bigger than either one of them.
And if anything, Obama belongs to the Party more than the Party belongs to him. They were the ones who cultivated and sold him as a media commodity, he didn’t organically rise to power from his own innate talents. Clinton is somewhat more independent from it given all the money, connections, and extortionary leverage she’s dirtily accumulated over the decades.
To: 867V309
I think you’re right. Both sides are unsure of their relative positions, hence the stalemate.
To: 867V309
I think you’re right. Both sides are unsure of their relative positions, hence the stalemate.
To: Utmost Certainty
Again I concur. One of my thoughts lately have embraced the notion of beginning a campaign goaled towards term limits. I know it’s been tossed around at “brain bashing events” but nothing has ever come of it. I believe it would eliminate a lot of what we are seeing today. Thanks for the mail and good conversation.
25
posted on
05/19/2016 12:38:26 AM PDT
by
progunner
(no compromise)
To: progunner
To: Utmost Certainty
The Dem party doesnt really belong to either Obama or Clinton. Its a vehicle for the accumulation & effectuation of power, and this is bigger than either one of them.
"The Dem party doesnt really belong to either Obama or Clinton. Its a vehicle for the accumulation & effectuation of power, and this is bigger than either one of them."
Wel, duh.
While political parties are owned by those who fund them, occasionally ownership passes to those who "steal" the voters. Like Trump.
Boosch supposedly owned the party with $150M. HA!
Both barkie and clintoon are slaves to the party, the party line, and the party donors. The question is which one will eat the other.
27
posted on
05/19/2016 12:49:01 AM PDT
by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: Utmost Certainty
I gotta hit the sack. I own a gun repair shop and I told a customer I’d stay up late for him to pick it up. He just left. Normally I’m asleep by now LOL. Have a good day tomorrow.
28
posted on
05/19/2016 12:49:55 AM PDT
by
progunner
(no compromise)
To: progunner
Lol, very awesome. Sleep well.
To: stocksthatgoup
Obama does not control the Democratic Party.
Obama is controlled—by people whose names we do not know in rooms we cannot locate.
Wake up!
30
posted on
05/19/2016 12:56:28 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Epistemology is not a spectator sport.)
To: 867V309
Obama doesn’t have the stomach for protracted power struggles and he knows it. Besides, he got his 8 years in and was able to do many things to help castrate America. I think he’s satisfied and doesn’t care that much at this point.
He’s institutionalized more ways than ever to abuse the population. And Hillary enjoys the abuse of power above all else, therefore she’d be a good enough continuation of his ‘legacy’.
To: period end of story; BunnySlippers; ntnychik
32
posted on
05/19/2016 1:06:41 AM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Onambla: Marxist-Muslim crack-smoking closet queen Exp 1-20-17)
To: Utmost Certainty
Obama doesnt have the stomach for protracted power struggles and he knows it.
Seriously? 8 years on and he hasn't let up one millisecond.
Besides, he got his 8 years in and was able to do many things to help castrate America. I think hes satisfied and doesnt care that much at this point.
What on God's green earth would make you think that?
Hes institutionalized more ways than ever to abuse the population. And Hillary enjoys the abuse of power above all else, therefore shed be a good enough continuation of his legacy.
You really don't understand narcissism.
33
posted on
05/19/2016 1:38:30 AM PDT
by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: PhilDragoo
We can hope.
That’s some collection of ugly, right there. URT.
34
posted on
05/19/2016 1:40:31 AM PDT
by
glock rocks
(Please support Free Republic)
To: 867V309
Exactly. Pray that Hillary’s health holds up & she is the dem nominee. She’s quite beatable.
To: 867V309
Seriously? 8 years on and he hasn't let up one millisecond.
Except he hasn't had to power struggle much to carry out his agenda. He rules via EOs and bureaucratic diktat in the face of an impotent Congress largely unwilling to fight him.
An internal power struggle vs. Hillary would be a wholly different sort of matter and I don't believe he will bother. Plus he'd be outmatched by the Clintons anywaythey're simply far more proficient at waging internal power struggles than he is.
You really don't understand narcissism.
Perhaps I'm underestimating it. Tell me a likely endgame here then and what Obama could/would possibly do. Because I just don't see him as being in the position right now to upend Hillary from being the nominee.
To: Zakeet
Looney Toons
Obama — Bugs Bunny
Bill Clinton — Elmer J Fudd.
Hillary Clinton — Road Runner
Bernie Sanders — Yosemite Sam
Donald Trump — Foghorn Leghorn
Your tastes may vary.
37
posted on
05/19/2016 2:06:33 AM PDT
by
Fhios
(Going Donald Trump is as close to going John Galt as we'll get.)
To: Utmost Certainty
Seriously? 8 years on and he hasn't let up one millisecond.
Except he hasn't had to power struggle much to carry out his agenda
====================================
He's been fighting the whole way. From Fast and Furious through IRS scandal, bengazi and others, one after another.
=======================================
You really don't understand narcissism.
Perhaps I'm underestimating it.
====================================
No, you just don't get it. Narcissism is me, me, me, no room for hillary or anyone else.
38
posted on
05/19/2016 2:12:57 AM PDT
by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: 867V309
No, you just don't get it. Narcissism is me, me, me, no room for hillary or anyone else.
Great, but he can't stop Hillary from getting nominated. So now what does he do? Even if he instructs the DoJ to prosecute her for the email violations and forces her to bow out, there's nobody he can replace her with.
To: Utmost Certainty
Great, but he can't stop Hillary from getting nominated.
Like I said upthread:
It's possible the contest between barkie and clintoon is a mexican standoff of the highest order.
We know they loathe each other. (After all, what's not to loathe?) Given that, it comes down to
1) what do they have on each other
2) how much do they fear that
3) what do each of them have to lose
for further discussion...
40
posted on
05/19/2016 2:22:05 AM PDT
by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson