[Utmost Certainty]

The Dem party doesn’t really belong to either Obama or Clinton. It’s a vehicle for the accumulation & effectuation of power, and this is bigger than either one of them.

And if anything, Obama belongs to the Party more than the Party belongs to him. They were the ones who cultivated and sold him as a media commodity, he didn’t organically rise to power from his own innate talents. Clinton is somewhat more independent from it given all the money, connections, and extortionary leverage she’s dirtily accumulated over the decades.

[867V309]

The Dem party doesn’t really belong to either Obama or Clinton. It’s a vehicle for the accumulation & effectuation of power, and this is bigger than either one of them.

"The Dem party doesn’t really belong to either Obama or Clinton. It’s a vehicle for the accumulation & effectuation of power, and this is bigger than either one of them."
Wel, duh.

While political parties are owned by those who fund them, occasionally ownership passes to those who "steal" the voters. Like Trump.

Boosch supposedly owned the party with $150M. HA!

Both barkie and clintoon are slaves to the party, the party line, and the party donors. The question is which one will eat the other.

[smalltownslick]

“he didn’t organically rise to power from his own innate talents”

He didn’t build that!