Posted on 05/17/2016 7:26:30 AM PDT by xzins
Here is proof Hillary Clinton doesnt care for the safety of your children.
From Breitbart:
Hillary Clinton is cautiously backing President Barack Obama controversial decree that forces the nations 100,000 K-12 public schools to open bathrooms and locker rooms to people who claim to be transgender.
Over the weekend, a Clinton spokesperson said Hillary is supportive of Obamas demands, but provided only a vaguely written endorsement that reduces the risk of sparking public opposition during her 2016 presidential campaign.
Hillary Clinton applauds the Obama administration for taking actions this week to stand up for the rights of LGBT peopleand particularly for the rights of transgender peopleacross the country, Clinton spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa told The Washington Post. As president, she will fight to make sure all Americans can live their lives free from discrimination.
This transgender and gender identity issue could become a problem for Clinton, partly because shes hoping to maximize her election-day support among women by pitching herself as the nations first female president. But many women, with or without kids in K-12 schools, may be hostile to Obamas claim that men become female once they adopt a female gender identity.
Parents throughout the country value the privacy and protection of their sons and daughters in the locker rooms and showers at public schools.
Obamas decree is a major breach of trust for parents and a major setback for local control by school districts, but there are no facts in a liberals world only interpretations depending on what you feel.
And lets face it, Hillary better support everything Obama does and says or hell stop stonewalling and the FBI will take her.
That would make her a “TARGET”.
It sounds as though Clinton supports Obonzo’s war on women’s toilets. Those wacky commies are something else.
Its about time!!
This is a supposed weakness for Trump. I wonder about that. Most defined cultures respect family culture and the Alpha male.
It depends on how the fed mandates business behavior.
If, for example, there are inspectors, fines, etc. for non-compliance, then those need to be rolled back.
I’m still of the mind that even without those, any fed law requiring Sears, Wal-Mart, etc MUST have transgendered access must be rolled back legislatively.
Also, I see no problem with a state law that makes each store financially responsible to victims due to any transgendered policies that they have. I also think they should make them by law criminally complicit corporately via negligence for any such policies on unique to any store.
I have Millenial children, who are NOT Libs thanks to the way they were raised.
But the vast majority of their peers have drunk the Bernie Sanders Kool-Aid. The “free college/forgive student loans” thing is like a Pied Piper siren song, drawing them like lemmings. I’m convinced Hillary will adopt this in a last-ditch attempt to save her skin.
The other problem is that they rely almost entirely on social media for their news. And as we’ve learned. guys like Mark Zuckerberg have installed iron-fisted gatekeepers who exercise 100% control.
Looks to me like this is the Joker in Hillary’s Woman Card deck, but her Obama Crazy Eights game apparently forbids her removing it from the deck.
Lesbo!!!
I have no problem with keeping it like it is under current law. Charlotte, for example, had to change the law that protected people into a law that did not do so. They did not ‘keep it like it is.’
This federal intrusion by Obama gives Trump a chance to clarify that states should turn back any wayward push in this area by the fed because they are no longer ‘keeping it the way it is.”
Well, I know when I heard him say that about Bruce Jenner I was like ‘hey how can a guy not care what the crybullies think about his common sense Islam immigration suggestion and then come down on that side of the issue?’
He also has said things that make me think he doesn’t want to force anyone to let men into women’s areas. So that is good, and way different than the other side.
Freegards
I’ve always only read summaries of what he’s said. I learned during the primary season to go look for the entire video, because I often found the reporters were not accurate.
In this case, I can agree that maybe he meant that he knows Jenner. Maybe Trump Tower has only private bathrooms. I simply don’t know.
I do know that I don’t want him on the fence in the event of a federal enforcement of transgendered access. He says it’s a states rights area, but he should also say that ‘peoples referenda’ trumps state legislatures.
No, Clintons want to win. They know that is out of step with US values, they normally would have it both ways on this issue, which she is seeking right now. She will ultimately come out and say something like we have to move more slowly, or something like that, especially where children are concerned. But support the brave decisions of folks like Target. Anyway, she will get on both sides of this issue, they always have and always will. It is how they do it.
But I do agree that the left is making even more outlandish bold statements than Trump and not being branded for the same. This is way more controversial than the wall of Trump and Muslim immigration controls.
My son is in middle school. He knows about this issue and is abhorred by it. Kids aren't stupid, and he isn't parroting me. He told me about this without having heard me say a thing on the subject. He ain't going there, period. Now, that can't be a bad thing when kids see the open face of liberalism directly in their face. There is no one he knows who is even mildly sympathetic to the idea.
Long story short, the indoctrination efforts are failing and are going to tilt the country back to conservatism in the next generation. You can't abridge common sense with PC and not expect a backlash.
Just so private businesses can choose, in my way of thinking. And yes, any laws immunizing them from litigation from their dumb policy would need to go, but holy crap I hate to think we are at the point where people are so dumb we need laws to protect them from choosing to be customers of these places.
Freegards
A NY Freeper said the bathrooms of one of his buildings is convenient to use when out in that part of the city, so it is open to public, not sure if they are singles or what.
“He says its a states rights area, but he should also say that peoples referenda trumps state legislatures.”
Agreed.
Freegards
I agree. A scary thought that people could be so uninformed. However, any laws protecting corporations from their own policies should be rolled back.
One thing that really astounds me is that I have looked at the Target policy and the Charlotte law, and there is not one peep or blurb in it preventing anyone who is a registered sex offender from manipulating their policy. Some will bring up the issue of same sex attraction by male sex offenders who have violated boys/men, but that is just another argument for private bathrooms and a requirement that registered sex offenders use those and not the communal varities.
Dictatorship of the Queeratariot
This is such great news!! Hillary supports sex perverts in little girls toilet ares. !! This is beyond awesome!!
“Some will bring up the issue of same sex attraction by male sex offenders who have violated boys/men...”
I think that this is what it looks like when a sizable portion of people, maybe even a majority, don’t realize that men and women have different levels of sexual attraction, no matter what they claim to be. The first thing I thought of was how it was a shame normal men have to put up with gay men’s nonsense in their exclusive areas. But at least they are men too. We are going to let men in the women’s bathroom if they claim to be women, and a sizable portion of society doesn’t realize they aren’t lesbians.
Madness.
Freegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.