Posted on 05/15/2016 10:26:30 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
The National Republican Senatorial Committee released an ad on Friday with a warning for Senate Democrats:
Hillary Clinton is "Toxic" for your reelection bids.
Clinton's long list of scandals has made her one of the most unpopular presidential candidates in recent history. Whether we rewind to her days as a lawyer defending a child rapist, or fast forward to her email scandal, her failure in Benghazi and the Clinton Foundation's questionable and perhaps unlawful connections, her whole political career is stained with controversy.
Her presidential campaign, meanwhile, has featured nothing but "fake accents, fake concerns and fake laughs." This political pandering and lack of transparency can account for why she is losing key demographics to Bernie Sanders.
The NRSC argues that the presumed Democratic presidential nominee controversial history leaves Democrats with one question: "Can they really support Hillary Clinton?"
What a waste of money. They already realize that.
Hillary is a toxic candidate.
She’d be guaranteed to lose to Trump except certain elements of the GOP are determined to elect her.
Yeah, isn’t that a hoot?
It’s a good ad, not necessarily aimed at Senate Dem’s.
It is nice to know the Senate Republicans are so concerned for the Dems. What a bunch of traitors.
I heard a knucklehead on FAUX news the other day quoting Clinton as saying she was going to empty the prisons because FIFTY PERCENT of everyone in prison is only in there for smoking marijuana, the wonder cure. Anyone know if the ditz actually said this?
The ad is not aimed at the Rat Sinators!
It is aimed at their voters, who have problems with the Clintoons!
It’s a good ad.
I don’t believe being traitorous is the intent of the ad. Did you watch the ad?
It’s a good ad, but most democrats already know all that stuff, and support her anyway. It’s because Clinton hates everything they hate; white people, cops, guns; obeying the law; etc.
Dear GOP: stop helping the D’s — if Hillary the Liar manages to keep her “Super-Delegates” bought off...and she gets the nomination...it will be the best thing to happen for the Republicans in over a generation. (Besides, the D’s pretty much all realize this already, anyway...)
FReeper Arthurus made a particularly good point: the DNC PTB are counting on Hillary being able to pull her chestnuts out of the fire......but she keeps tanking. “So if Trump is set to win so overwhelmingly that the voter fraud Boobamba and Val have in the works would be patently obvious to the voting population, then Hillary will have to go......and will probably be indicted.
I’m sick of the Clintons. We need it written down somewhere...maybe amend the Constitution....that once you’re in the WH 4 or 8 years, then you go back home.
The Clintons don’t seem to know their time is up.....he’s out there saving the world, a-g-a-i-n, and raking in big bucks......she’s been in the WH, the Senate, the State Dept and now a candidate, again.
Go back home and stay there, Clintons.
Hillary’s early corruption included being fired as an attorney for malfeasence from the investigation of Nixon and Watergate. ,
I would like to see an amendment limiting anyone to 18 years in federal elected office—in total.
3 terms as senator = 18
9 terms as congressman = 18
6 terms in congress and 1 term as senator = 18
1 term in senate, 2 term in congress, 2 term president = 18.
Not sure I would throw president into the mix (since it is already term limited at 2), but there should be a limit to the amount of time a person spends in federal office. The founders didn’t want pro politicians. Those that spend 30-40 years in office are a disgrace (imho). The only reason they stay in is because the learn to leverage the power of their office to stay in.
I would like to see an amendment limiting anyone to 18 years in federal elected office—in total.
3 terms as senator = 18
9 terms as congressman = 18
6 terms in congress and 1 term as senator = 18
1 term in senate, 2 term in congress, 2 term president = 18.
Not sure I would throw president into the mix (since it is already term limited at 2), but there should be a limit to the amount of time a person spends in federal office. The founders didn’t want pro politicians. Those that spend 30-40 years in office are a disgrace (imho). The only reason they stay in is because the learn to leverage the power of their office to stay in.
One of the things-—among many-—that hurt her popularity:
videos of ex-Secy Hillary, smiling brightly, as she took the podium, over and over again.
She didn’t allow her remarks to be heard-—there’s just a smiling, effervescent Hillary at the podium.
No doubt, she encouraged the airing of those videos b/c she figured being a popular speaker would help her candidacy.
Americans later found out the smiling Hillary was getting huge amounts of money for one speech.
Sanders/Nader!
Because Socialism is Unsafe At Any Speed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.