Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy poised to take ownership of its largest warship (USS Zumwalt)
Associated Press ^ | May 15, 2016 | DAVID SHARP

Posted on 05/15/2016 7:06:35 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

BATH, Maine (AP) — The U.S. Navy is ready to take ownership of the Zumwalt, its largest and most technologically sophisticated destroyer.

Sailors' uniforms and personal effects, supplies and spare parts are being moved aboard the 610-foot warship in anticipation of crew members taking on their new charge, said Capt. James Kirk, the destroyer's skipper.

The Zumbalt is the first new class of warship built at Bath Iron Works since the Arleigh Burke slid into the Kennebec River in 1989. The shipyard is expected to turn the destroyer over to the Navy this week.

"We've overcome lots of obstacles to get to this point," said electrician John Upham, of Litchfield. "I think everybody in the shipyard is proud of the work we've done."

The ship features an angular shape that makes it 50 times more difficult to detect on radar; it's powered by electricity produced by turbines similar to those in a Boeing 777; new guns are designed to pummel targets from nearly 100 miles away. Advanced automation will allow the big ship to operate with a much smaller crew than on current generation of destroyers.

The final cost of the Zumwalt is expected to be at least $4.4 billion.

The original concept for the land-attack destroyer was floated more than 15 years ago then underwent several permutations. The final design called for a destroyer with a stealthy shape and advanced gun system that can fire rocket-propelled projectiles with pinpoint accuracy.

But the growing cost forced the Navy to reduce what was originally envisioned as a 32-ship program to just three ships. The loss of economies of scale drove up the cost of the individual ships.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: badheadline; boondoggle; destroyer; pos; usn; warship; wasteofmoney; zumwalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki

Shades of “Holy WWI battleship bow design,” Batman!


21 posted on 05/15/2016 7:24:03 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Since the USS Enterprise (CVN-65) was decommissioned in 2013, and the USS Enterprise (CVN-80) is cheduled to be constructed and in operation by 2025, he has to have some command, somewhere.


22 posted on 05/15/2016 7:24:06 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Advanced automation will allow the big ship to operate with a much smaller crew than on current generation of destroyers

So when they take 50% casualties, what?

23 posted on 05/15/2016 7:26:02 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Cruz never could have outfought Trump.But I didn't know until this day that it was Romney all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
In the end, the US will have a handful of superweapons, while our enemies will have hundreds (or thousands) of attack boats, drones, etc.

Nazi tanks vs. Soviet tanks. The Nazis had the quality, the Soviets had the quantity. We all know how that turned out.

24 posted on 05/15/2016 7:26:36 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

As the Russians say: Quantity has a “quality” all its own.

CC


25 posted on 05/15/2016 7:28:13 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Don’t be too proud of this technological terror you’ve constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the Force.


26 posted on 05/15/2016 7:28:42 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Cruz never could have outfought Trump.But I didn't know until this day that it was Romney all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Some trolls at AP just trolling I guess. Zumwalt with laughable look is destroyer class below 15K ton displacement, AFAIK still prototype it doesn't even carry mach 10+ standard 3 missile while Arleigh Burke-class destroyers carry the SM-3.
27 posted on 05/15/2016 7:29:16 AM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Actually, in the T-34, the Soviets had quantity, quality, and reliability.


28 posted on 05/15/2016 7:30:55 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Agreed!


29 posted on 05/15/2016 7:31:04 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

30 posted on 05/15/2016 7:31:56 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Is the Chief Medical Officer Bones?

Engineering Officer Scotty?

31 posted on 05/15/2016 7:36:30 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance; sukhoi-30mki
Oh I'd read some navy admiral want rail gun aboard that Zumwalt, too?
32 posted on 05/15/2016 7:39:27 AM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

33 posted on 05/15/2016 7:40:25 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Pretty cool, but I can go one better. I had a classmate whose name was James Kirk, and he was a career pilot for Delta. I bet there were some interesting reactions from the passengers when he came on the intercom.


34 posted on 05/15/2016 7:40:27 AM PDT by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Yup, that’s why the massive power capabilities.


35 posted on 05/15/2016 7:40:39 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The U.S. Navy is ready to take ownership of the Zumwalt, its largest and most technologically sophisticated destroyer.

Title is misleading. The USS Zumwalt is not the Navy's largest warship.

36 posted on 05/15/2016 7:42:11 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

37 posted on 05/15/2016 7:43:26 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

You know the crew is going to be teased.


38 posted on 05/15/2016 7:44:02 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

My understanding is that the hull design is one discarded centuries ago because it is prone to floundering in heavy seas. Haven’t seen a picture yet of heavy sea trials for the Zumwalt.


39 posted on 05/15/2016 7:46:44 AM PDT by RideForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Russians also had a lot of quality tanks. Before Hitler turned on the Russians there were very high level military contacts and information sharing. The Russians were convinced the Germans were hiding their best designs, because the Russians already better models in production.
Germans held the edge in optics and wireless, but in many facets the Russians held the edge through the war (mobility, protection, durability).

Back to the topic. The USMIC has ripped off Americans for decades. I don’t expect a change anytime soon.


40 posted on 05/15/2016 7:49:41 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson