Posted on 05/14/2016 9:45:20 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
Over the past couple of days, some Hillary Clinton critics have complained over the way her campaign has described the FBIs probe into her private email server. Clinton and her campaign have called the probe a "security inquiry" regarding information stored on the server, as opposed to a criminal probe.
"I say what I have said now for many, many months: It's a security inquiry," she said on CBS May 8.
Heres what we know about the investigation so far.
The FBI is conducting an investigation. (Its the Federal Bureau of Investigation, after all.)
But on May 11, reporters met with FBI Director James Comey, and he said he is not familiar with the term "security inquiry." Instead, he said, "we're conducting an investigation. That's what we do."
So is it an "inquiry" or is it an "investigation"? While Clinton might shy away from the word "investigation," it is truly a distinction without a difference. Inquiry is just another word for investigation.
--------------------------------
But of course, Clintons actions are clearly front-and-center in the FBI investigation. Based on her knowledge of how classified information mishandling cases proceed, and her understanding of public reports about Clintons role in the email setup, Glasser said the FBI is very likely looking at Clinton specifically.
"My experience tells me that Hillary Clinton is a subject of a criminal investigation," Glasser said.
"If this thing was dead on arrival, nobody would be willing to keep this thing going," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at politifact.com ...
This is not a mishandling of classified information case.
It's a money laundering, bribery, conspiracy, influence peddling, and espionage case.
100’s of full time “Special” Agents can’t find anything after months and months?
Bbut we needed a hoard of reporters going through Sarah Palin’s trash and inspecting the logos on her cloths.
The reason I posted this is because it was on the front page, above the fold, of the Tampa Bay Times. This paper is a mirror image of the NY Times and normally goes to great lengths to cover for both her and Obama. This is telling in that it may signal a change in the conventional wisdom(in the MSM) of her innocence.
In related news, the HILLARY! campaign announced that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was changing their name to the Federal Bureau of Security Inquiry.
F-BS. Might turn out to be appropriate in this case.
The investigation keeps going because Hillary Clinton has committed so many crimes.
it depends on what the meaning of “investigation” is.
And that's leaving hubby Big Bill's frequent flier miles on AirPedophile out of it...
Maybe the Secret Service can rename themselves "Secret Service Savile"...
Of course, even Congress can do virtually nothing unless a special prosecutor is appointed by the DOJ, and the chances of that happening are ZERO.
An inquiry may just be a review. An FBI investigation is looking into the possibility of criminal activity.
Hillary Clinton is a lying, thieving, bullying dirty little snot.
She will behave to the FBI like a lying, thieving, bullying, dirty little snot.
The FBI knows how she’s going to act.
They are working hard to not give her any wiggle room.
The one thing Hillary REALLY wants to do is get on tv and pontificate about how she has been mistreated. The FBI isn’t going to give her that opportunity.
The FBI is going to show up with semi trailers filled with evidence against Hillary.
Hillary is destroying the Democrat Party.
This is the best year I’ve had since I was a kid!
Nobody gives a crap about that - not enough to bring down HRC, anyway.
This may be coming to a head pretty soon. They are interviewing close associates of the target which I understand is one of the last parts of an investigation.
Politifact is just another liberal website pretending to be an “non-bias news” organization.
From the www.politifactbias.com website’s FAQ section:
“...The ...Tampa Bay Times, which started PolitiFact in conjunction with the Congressional Quarterly, is a traditionally liberal paper.”
Liberal pukes at my work always run to Politifact when challenged with a political question (exhibit A). So for example the Clintoon Email story as reported in this thread’s “news” story link is proof of the liberal bias at Politifact.
Then the next response from the liberal puke workmates of mine is ‘... well Condi Rice and Colon Powel did the same thing!!!’ without giving any specifics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.