Posted on 05/10/2016 4:09:24 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer
Hillary Clintons email troubles just keep getting weirder and weirder and harder for anyone but the most die-hard Clinton fans to ignore.
The latest twist is news that four years worth of State Department emails from Clintons top IT staffer, Bryan Pagliano, cant be found.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
“vanished” means sequestered as an obstruction of justice
and treason — all so acceptable to the lying, EXEMPT,
ultrahated, (uniparty), proterrorist, GOP.
“I say we takeoff and waterboard him from orbit. Its the only way to be sure.”
Because IT guys never back anything up.
"Uno...Dos..."POOF!...and they vanished without a Tres!
Why don’t they just pull them out of the “we record every email on the planet but don’t look at them” DHS data files?
But the real crime the Just Us department is investigating is that North Carolina does not want men to share your daughter’s restroom.
Obviously, they only talked about Chelsea’s wedding, so they were deemed ‘personal’ and deleted with the rest of the ‘personal’ emails.
This IT guy will be found one morning in Ft. Marcy Park.
What difference does it make? /sarcasm
The key witness who has been granted immunity for his testimony about how he set up Clintons private email server in her home, .PST file (email archive file) is missing from the time period during Hitlery’s tenure at the State Dept. ? How Convenient!
-PJ
Actually it isn’t very convenient for him since his immunity can be revoked if it seems he is holding back evidence or deceiving the investigators. So if the State Department comes back and says they think he deleted the file before he left, his immunity will go right out the window.
The server not only contained State Dept emails, it contained documents from Bill Clinton’s presidency, as evidenced by the images on the documents that Guccifer downloaded from the server. The IT guy used the same server that had been in the White House.... A virtual treasure trove for foreign intelligence.
If you look at what they are saying....they simply state that there’s supposed to be some address used, and there’s nothing there.
I would suggest, since he was Clinton’s private IT guy...he never used any state department address, and simply took up a personalized address off the same server that Hillary herself was using.
Course, it will be a shock when they look over a guy who was getting four years of pay from the State Dept....to find he never sent a single email. That won’t be explainable.
How about a show of hands from all that are surprised that there is another “surprise” in this theater of the absurd.
Anyone?
That’s what I thought.
<><> Paglianos dual role as 1) a tax-paid US government employee, and, 2) Hillary's personal employee, opens a whole new arena for investigation, similar the ongoing scrutiny of Hillary aide, Huma Abedin (Huma worked simultaneously for 1) the State Department, 2) the Clinton Foundation, 3) Hillary herself, and, Teneo---a private company closely tied to both Clintons. She also billed herself as a "private consultant."
<><> What was Paglianos day-to-day State Dept job? What did he actually do, not just his job description, but actual work accomplishments? Is there a paper trail showing he did any actual work at all, or was the State job just a make-work position to get him on the tax-paid payroll in return for his services to Clintons?
<><> Pagliano listed himself on LinkedIn as a political-appointee saying he Serves as strategic advisor and special projects manager to the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) / Deputy Chief Information Officer (DCIO) overseeing the operations of the Information Resource Management (IRM) bureau.
<><> Pagliano being employed at such a high level inside States IT structure assures that States most senior info officers knew about Clintons email setup, and apparently did not, or were not, able to stop it. Unless Brian never told his supervisor about his "other" job.
<><> What was going on inside the State Department vis-a-vis Hillary's email server? Who knew about it? When did they know? Was it ever vetted/approved, and if so, by whom?
<><> Were objections raised by security personnel and how were those objections dealt with? Who is on the complete list of people who had email addresses on the server?
<><> What discussions took place inside State regarding the presence of classified information on the server? Were objections ever raised from outside State, say from the White House or the intel community?
<><> Pagliano can also speak to 1) what security measures if any were in place on Clintons server, and, 2) when they were instituted.
<><> Tech-savvy Pagliano had visibility into Hillary's server logs, showing any attacks or penetrations into the server.
<><> Pagliano, as a State Department employee under Hillary, had access to the State Department computer systems.
<><> Pagliano currently works as a computer contractor for State, and still has access to State Department computer systems. Has he ever been asked by Clinton to use his positions to gain information she would ordinarily not have access to, or to which she did not want her name attached?
<><> Pagliano may have knowledge of where any backups of the server are, shedding light on what emails were deleted by Clinton before her full disclosure of what was in fact a highly curated batch of documents.
CONCLUSIONS There is a lot to learn from Bryan Pagliano. His testimony could be like when the Feds turn a Mafia accountant, a low-level guy with access to the family jewels.
========================================
BONUS: WRT the State Departments Chief Information Officer, who should have stopped the Clinton email server? Well, well, she retired from State a few months before Hillary left, into a nice job at the IMF. It pays to be a winner!
SOURCE: See more at: http://wemeantwell.com/blog/tag/bryan-pagliano/#sthash.7unm1UiJ.dpuf
And the Just Us department gave this guy immunity! Boy is this country screwed or what?
Did they check Hil’s bathroom?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.