Uh that should be illegal to give a discount based on gender.
The owner if this place is a moron.
Great. Let me stick a couple of grapefruits under my shirt and I’ll be right over.
If the owner really believes this nonsense he’ll make it a permanent policy.
And pay all of his employees exactly the same regardless of skill or experience.
What a sexist pig.
They devote the same amount of time and service to men and women customers (actually probably MORE time to women) yet they charge men more.
What’s next for this idiot place? I know - let them charge black customers MORE because - studies prove - they tip less.
What a stupid stunt. I know if I went there - I would never go back.
A social justice warrior with a couple of restaurants.
No thanks.
.
Suppose you have a “woman” or girl in your party. You know: grandmas, infant girls, sisters, wives all count.
And do you still get the full 79% if there are four women and one man in your group?
And supposed you are a male considering transgenderism. Can you promise to refund the discount if you change your mind and decide to remain a male.
Those towns are all commie all the time.
LMAO!!! What about men who “identify” as women? Deny them the discount and PayPal, Bruce Springsteen and DeutscheBank will shun you forever.
Self identify as a woman and sue the idiot if he sexual discriminates.
I didn’t know you could discriminate and change prices based on sex. Can we add a surcharge to certain races to convert crime costs?
So what does this mean? Does “The Works” pay its waitresses only 79 cents for each dollar it pays its waiters? Does it pay the female cook 79% of what it pays the male cook? If so, they should be sued. Of course, that’s not what it means. I’m sure that The Works pays all comparable waiters and waitresses and cooks the same rate irrespective of their sex. Just like every other company pays all comparable workers the same irrespective of their sex. This is all just more BS.
Hopefully the guys will just not show up March 14. Let them eat their own losses.
Just declare you’re a woman that day. If they deny you the discount sue the ever living stuffing out of them. That’s the only way to make liberalism pay.
So he “knows” this is a perpetual problem, but only gives the discount for one day a year?
Cowardly publicity stunt. The guy needs to man up, live his convictions and institute this permanently.
can I ask some stupid questions??
We keep hearing liberals say that women make 79 cents on the dollar, or some lesser amount than men.
Are these comparisons for men and women who are doing the same job??
Are these comparisons taking into account issues such as years of experience, seniority with a company??
Are these comparisons taking into account full time vs. part time work, comparing hours worked to hourly wages?
Are these comparisons controlling for the fact that women more than men tend to take time off from job or career to care for their small children?
Are these comparisons considering that some women actually prefer to not climb the career ladder as high as they could, so that they have more time for their families?? Some women actually turn down promotional opportunities, relocating to other cities, etc. in order to better balance work and family life.
Just a few thoughts. To state a gross overall figure, state that women make less than men, and just leave the impression that such disparity MUST BE due to some illegal discrimination or micro aggression against females, is absurd.
Which of those female patrons makes less than a man? Or more? How does anyone know?
Should I automatically deduct the bill for a woman who makes a mere $40,000 a year, but not for a man who is unemployed?
None of this makes sense.
Dress up like a woman and get a discount. Pay only 79%. Sounds like a plan.
Easy lawsuit to win if any man is nearby and can stop by and get refused the discount. You’ll own that business.
Can I ask a stupid question??
Paying women less for the same job as a man is illegal, and has been against the law, going back to the Equal Pay Act of 1963.
The stupid question is: If Obama is convinced this is a huge issue, what has he done about this in his 7 plus years as president?? This alleged pay discrimination is already against the law. Obama can invoke executive orders, and Loretta Lynch can launch lawsuits on this subject, because the laws to deal with this already exist.
So what has Obama done?
Hillary agrees with this women earn less than men mantra too. What did she do in her time in public office/first lady, to deal with this?
What did Bill and Hillary do, when they were in the White House, to combat this alleged discrimination??