Skip to comments.
After Loss in Colorado, Donald Trump Supporters Give State Chairman an Earful
New York Times ^
| 4/11/2016
| Alan Rappeport
Posted on 04/11/2016 8:11:07 PM PDT by snarkpup
[Colorado Republican Party Chairman Steve] House acknowledged that there are a lot of deeply entrenched players within the party who think the system works well and believe that those who are the most politically engaged should determine who becomes the partys presidential nominee.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: co2016; cruz; jedijonestrolling; republican; rockymountainhiest; stevehouse; taft; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Like I say, it's not just corrupt people at the top. Corrupt rank-and-file Republicans who know how to game the system are what must be overcome in order to get a system in which the voting public's intent is taken into account. I do not expect internal reforms. It will require legislation or a ballot initiative—both of which are now in progress due to public outrage.
1
posted on
04/11/2016 8:11:07 PM PDT
by
snarkpup
To: snarkpup
I’ve already told my elected representatives that if the GOPe continues on their path toward a contested convention I will not vote for any candidate with an R next to their name.
2
posted on
04/11/2016 8:13:26 PM PDT
by
ladyjane
To: snarkpup
Next Tuesday can’t come soon enough to slap that Cruz smirk off his ugly mug. Let’s see how he does does when Patriotic American voters vote. I think it is appropriate that New York will be the state to make Cruz unable to make 1237.
3
posted on
04/11/2016 8:15:49 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: snarkpup
As I posted in my duplicate thread:
I’m sure the average voter was paying attention a year ago when the GOPe decided to change the rules.
Arrogant elitism in action in USA elections.
There is only one party, The Establishment.
4
posted on
04/11/2016 8:16:45 PM PDT
by
TroutStalker
("Protect the hypersensitive. Ban everything.")
To: snarkpup
Well. I thought there were no Trump supporters in Colorado. Ive been asking all day for the numbers of Kasich and Trump votes and no one knew. All the Cruz people act as if there was not one single vote for either Kasich or Trump.
There actually were Trump supporters in Colorado??
5
posted on
04/11/2016 8:17:22 PM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: snarkpup
It’s a better system than letting Democrats “cross over” in open primaries. I think New York at least has the right idea in making people register for the party in the primary 8 or so months before the vote is held.
6
posted on
04/11/2016 8:17:57 PM PDT
by
JediJones
(Cheatin' Trump got 37% of the vote in the primary but has 45% of the delegates! Bad system! Unfair!)
To: dynoman
67% of the voters in South Carolina did not vote for Trump. Why did he get all 50 delegates? Why were they disenfranchised?
7
posted on
04/11/2016 8:18:53 PM PDT
by
JediJones
(Cheatin' Trump got 37% of the vote in the primary but has 45% of the delegates! Bad system! Unfair!)
To: napscoordinator
It’s appropriate because New York is a blue cesspool of liberal values where even the Republicans are huge RINOs like Peter King, Rudy Giuliani and one Donald J. Trump. Not to mention his kids who backed same-sex marriage, fund-raised for Corey Booker, are best friends with Chelsea Clinton and/or never bothered to register as Republicans.
8
posted on
04/11/2016 8:20:13 PM PDT
by
JediJones
(Cheatin' Trump got 37% of the vote in the primary but has 45% of the delegates! Bad system! Unfair!)
To: dynoman
There were no votes. Delegates were selected by the party elites.
Screw we the people.
9
posted on
04/11/2016 8:22:36 PM PDT
by
TroutStalker
("Protect the hypersensitive. Ban everything.")
To: JediJones
67% of the voters in South Carolina did not vote for Trump. Why did he get all 50 delegates? Why were they disenfranchised?
_____________________
Afraid of winner takes all? Especially when voters actually vote?
To: snarkpup
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Josef.Stalin.Quote.0DE9
Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."
11
posted on
04/11/2016 8:23:35 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(I 'm just another low info/stupid & evil/vile/crazy Trump supporter wanting to select my candidate!!)
To: snarkpup
To: JediJones
To the extent we have primaries in Colorado (for other offices), they are closed. Open vs. closed has not been an issue here.
13
posted on
04/11/2016 8:24:21 PM PDT
by
snarkpup
(I want a government small enough that my main concern in life doesn't need to be who's running it.)
To: dynoman
There actually were Trump supporters in Colorado??
I can pesonally vouch for at least a dozen of us here in Colorado that will no longer be part of the gop.
14
posted on
04/11/2016 8:24:48 PM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(Cruz <- sleaze; Clinton <- criminal; Trump <- write-in)
To: JediJones
20,000+ in Albany today, lib. Let's see your man Bernie match that:
To: snarkpup
16
posted on
04/11/2016 8:25:12 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(I 'm just another low info/stupid & evil/vile/crazy Trump supporter wanting to select my candidate!!)
To: D-fendr
Ping to 9. Reference material.
17
posted on
04/11/2016 8:25:45 PM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: JediJones
As long as Cruz is knocked out, I don’t care which state does it. Cruz is going after little delegate numbers while losing delegate rich states like Florida and New York.
18
posted on
04/11/2016 8:26:14 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: snarkpup
If the “party bosses” are betting that average voters won’t show up at the caucuses, then isn’t the best way to beat them by...showing up?
To: snarkpup
Its all fake. Why even have primaries and caucuses where millions wait in line after taking the time to drive to a poll location. This whole thing is a joke. The republican party looks like a joke.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson