Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado GOP hastily deletes 'Never Trump' tweet following sweeping Ted Cruz delegate victory
http://www.thedenverchannel.com ^ | April 10, 2016 | Oscar Contreras

Posted on 04/11/2016 7:45:57 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo. - The Colorado GOP is getting some backlash after someone with access to the party's Twitter account posted, and quickly deleted, the following message: "We did it. #NeverTrump."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cannisazombietroll; co2016; colorado; cruz; gope; nevertrump; selectednotelected; trump; twitter; uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last
To: SoothingDave

Have you even read the Constitution? No, your just on here to rant and rave about something your to lazy and incompetent to research...yet you have a computer, or you wouldn’t be on here, and you don’t use it to make yourself anything other than looking like the stupid fool you are!!!


121 posted on 04/11/2016 9:59:33 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

What “voice of the people”? All those who bothered to participate for their voices heard.


122 posted on 04/11/2016 10:00:13 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet; DesertRhino

Posts #153-#156 give details, rules and the delegates behind this move.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3419631/posts?page=156#156


123 posted on 04/11/2016 10:02:23 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

I think you mean the Republican Party of Colorado did this - not the state.

See this Denver Post story: http://www.denverpost.com/editorials/ci_29563108/colorado-gop-blundered-2016-presidential-caucus

They never offered a valid reason why. One party official said they didn’t want voters to flock to their caucus...

Read that again: They DIDN’T want voters...

They didn’t want voters.


124 posted on 04/11/2016 10:02:29 AM PDT by DBG8489
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

No, I’ve never read it. Can you point me to the clause that requires primary election voting in the selection of a political party’s nominee? Thanks.


125 posted on 04/11/2016 10:05:04 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
I keep seeing posts about "the rules" and Republican voters need to accept them.

Does anyone else remember Republican candidates winning primaries and caucuses and then the delegates getting assigned to someone else? OR not having a vote of any kind at all and the delegates get assigned by the party?

I remember some such shenanigans happening with Hillary and Obummer but never remember such things in the GOP.

I know now that no matter if this is the way it always was or is the new way things are done then I am forever done with the GOP. I may vote for one GOP candidate this next election if Trump gets them nom. but I am done with them after that. I will change my voting registration to Independent in the General Election. The GOP can go F*** itself.

126 posted on 04/11/2016 10:09:00 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
What “voice of the people”? All those who bothered to participate for their voices heard.

People showed up, waited in line to vote. Now all of a sudden, they are told about some obscure ruling which most people have never seen before.

The optics will come back to haunt the GOP into a third rate party.

127 posted on 04/11/2016 10:10:32 AM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Thank you.


128 posted on 04/11/2016 10:16:07 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

It shows you didn’t...like I said, you have a computer


129 posted on 04/11/2016 10:18:36 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

Yes, I misunderstood originally, then read up on it.


130 posted on 04/11/2016 10:23:32 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

When was the first presidential primary? Did all of the parties violate the Constitution in the 100 plus years before that?


131 posted on 04/11/2016 10:25:00 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

Has the “voice of the people” selected a majority candidate?


132 posted on 04/11/2016 10:26:03 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: cann

The Republican Party has killed itself off.
Sure, nominate the hole Cruz (who will lose it all to Hillary); then the GOPe will tell you conservatism lost the race. We needed a moderate.

IMO let the GOP burn to the ground.


133 posted on 04/11/2016 10:29:26 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

How is something where the public is supposed to vote end up private?
Republicans signed their own extinction with their moves along with Cruz.
Even Rush said this was the establishment backing one of their own, Cruz.


134 posted on 04/11/2016 10:31:47 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Let’s see, you have the actual Republican party in a conspiracy to defraud VOTERS and sabotaging Trump.

What could go wrong here?


135 posted on 04/11/2016 10:33:38 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
How is something where the public is supposed to vote end up private?

Huh? The public could vote for delegates.

136 posted on 04/11/2016 10:35:35 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Who’s defrauding voters? Do words just mean anything you want?


137 posted on 04/11/2016 10:36:36 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
But again that’s the process that the CO GOP chose, and it was in place for months before. Cruz’s team knew enough about it to exploit it. It’s not any different than a team behind in a basketball game committing fouls to stop the clock in a hope that by stopping the clock and getting the ball back after the free throw attempts, they may be able to catch up with enough quick breaks or 3 pointers. It’s not considered “abuse”’of any rule to do that. The same logic applies in this case.

What a load of crap. Basketball games don't have flexible rules that can be changed before or during the game to benefit one team over another. Your analogy sucks.

138 posted on 04/11/2016 10:41:22 AM PDT by Kazan (Trump: Pit bull, Hillary: Pound of hamburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: cann
Ted is lyin', cheatin' hack doing the bidding for the Republican establishment. No true outsider would be working with the establishment to manipulate ever changing rules and taking GOPe donor money to thwart the will of the voters.

Ted can burn in hell.

139 posted on 04/11/2016 10:43:36 AM PDT by Kazan (Trump: Pit bull, Hillary: Pound of hamburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: cann
Only GOPe candidate would play the game the way Ted is playing it.

He's worse than Romney and the Bushes combined. Only a fool would have any trust in CheaTED.

140 posted on 04/11/2016 10:44:47 AM PDT by Kazan (Trump: Pit bull, Hillary: Pound of hamburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson