Posted on 04/10/2016 8:21:55 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in New Jersey resulting from charges of ballot access fraud. A primary ballot disqualification hearing is scheduled by the Secretary of State for Monday, April 11 at 9:00 a.m. in Mercerville, New Jersey.
Washington D.C. Law Professor Victor Williams charges that Ted Cruz fraudulently certified his constitutional eligibility for office to gain ballot access. Williams demands that Cruz be disqualified from several late-primary ballots: "Cruz committed ballot access fraud in each state when he falsely swore that he was a 'natural born' American citizen." Cruz was born in Calgary, Canada and held his resulting Canadian citizenship until May 2014. Cruz is a naturalized (not natural born) American citizen.
Williams' fraud charges had quick effect in New Jersey. Rather than accepting Cruz's ballot petition when filed last week, the Secretary of State ( Kim Guadagno) scheduled the unusual Administrative Law hearing for April 11. The Canadian-born Cruz must prove that he did not falsely certify his eligibility for office.
Cruz's ballot eligibility is also being challenged in California, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at gloucestercitynews.net ...
She's a public figure. She was a member of the Texas State Republican Executive Committee. She smeared herself by promoting Stormfront and other such crap. We removed her from the committee for good cause.
There are no sealed records to be unsealed.
You are caught up in a fantasy world
There are no sealed records. That’s another Trump lie
“Until Cruz unseals his records “
There are no sealed records.
You, sir, are a damnable liar, I say again, sir.
No Ted Cruz records have been sealed.
“While attending Texas schools my entire childhood and my Constitution class at a Texas state school, the texts all stated there were THREE types of citizenship. Natural born required that the citizen be born on American soil to TWO American citizens.”
No, they did not.
Hogwash.
Nice try.
But there is no such thing and no Texas textbook ever taught it.
“This this why the GOPe, Rush and Levin not looking in to the Obama BC issue?”
Rush & Levin owe their allegiance to their syndicators, and more importantly, their ADVERTISERS. Rush earns roughly 20 million of his 70 million per year on profit participation with his advertisers.If the majority are anti-Trump, Rush is anti-Trump. Rush is a moneyboy! Levin? He’s just a slut : )
“The president and leader of the Armies MUST BE a person who had NO OTHER LOYALTIES”
That is absolutely false, although it sounds nice.
The Constitution requires a President to be at least 35 years old.
HOWVER....
The Constitution only requires a president to live inside the United States for 14 of those 35 years.
So 60% of a President’s life could be lived in a foreign country.
Why did the Founders do that?
Why didn’t they say that a President has to live 100% of his life inside the United States? Or 80%?
The Founders only require a President to live inside the United States only 40% of his life.
You must be a very young pup and easily deceived.
“The governor of Maine (a US Citizen) is married to a Canadian citizen and his daughters were born in Canada. He stated that they had to be naturalized to become US citizens”
He is an idiot.
“I do not have a born in the US birth certificate... “
You don’t need one.
Suppose some survivalists go up into the mountains of Idaho to live off the land. They have a boy. 30 years later — with NO birth certificate from anywhere — the boy comes down out of the mountains and decides to run for President.
Is he a US citizen?
Of course.
Does he have a birth certificate?
NOPE.
But he is still a natural born citizen.
How many people living in the frontier and wilderness in the days our Founders wrote the Constitution had birth certificates?
Very few.
‘Natural born’ US citizenship has three requirements: Two US citizen parents giving birth to their child on US soil... “
That’s only your fantasy.
Your fantasy has no connection with reality or connection to the US Constitution.
WHERE in the Constitution does it say what you claim?
” No one has the Constitutional authority, no not even Harvard Law schooled Cruz, to subvert the peoples Constitution.”
No one is subverting the Constitution.
The Constitution DOES NOT SAY what you want it to say.
You want it.
The Constitution DOES NOT SAY IT as you want it.
Frankly, it is you who are subverting the Constitution by imposing YOUR views on the Constitution.
“That is the ‘natural’ part that no Act of Congress or court can give or take... “
Where is that in the Constitution?
The Constitution explicitly gives Congress the power to define citizenship.
Cruz and his surrogates attacked Trump’s wife first, Trump truth.
BTW - sCruz supporters are going to get the same thing his mistresses got, sCruzed
“Congress cannot define citizenship.”
Yes, they can. The Constitution says so explicitly. See Section 5 of the 14th Amendment.
” If Congress could define citizenship, they could enact a law that prevents a particular person or persons from being a citizen or NBC.”
No, they could not because the law has to be in place when the person is born. Otherwise it is forbidden as an “ex post facto” law.
“They could decide who they want are NBCs and who aren’t. “
That is correct. That is the power of Congress and the President signing bills.
The Founders expected the voters to pay attention and elect good people.
I’m not lying and you are IGNORANT regarding the Constitution! I suggest you get educated by reading the following blog:
“Ted Cruz Misrepresents the Law and His Being a Natural Born Citizen at Town Hall Meeting
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
February 18, 2016
LOOK IT UP!
“Unfortunately, there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government”
Yes there is. When the Cruz family returned to the United States, they remained continuously in the United States for 42 years.
If they did not apply for a CRBA, Ted Cruz could only have received a 6 month visa and would have had to leave after 6 months.
But more important:
There is no evidence that Ted Cruz’s family DID NOT apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad.
So you are just making things up.
“on the off chance he should be nominated the DNC can and will challenge his documents.”
They cannot, because it has already been decided. Once it is decided, that’s the end of it. It’s over.
“Its a very different thing from an irate lawyer or individual because they have standing.”
No, they do not have standing. The DNC cannot bring a lawsuit. Hillary cannot bring a lawsuit.
The courts have already ruled that nobody has standing because if you don’t like a candidate being on the ballot DON’T VOTE FOR THEM.
Nobody has standing because all you have to do is “change the channel” so to speak.
That is why the DNC does not have standing.
If you don’t like Ted Cruz, don’t vote for him.
Case closed.
You have NO right to mess with ‘original intent’. GET over yourself.
Very difficult when Judge Snow threatens to throw everyone in jail. Hard to resolve anything with a cloud like that hanging over everyone.
I must say that Donald Trump’s rise in the polls especially in Arizona seems to have changed the complexion of things.
"Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy than Cruz. He’s a crook, and has the Establishment doing all his dirty work for him behind the scenes.."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.