Posted on 04/06/2016 4:27:17 PM PDT by drewh
If there was something damning, he would have.
BEFORE the so important Wisconsin primary.
The Enquirer, this guy, the Wa Post, someone would have let any tangible evidence out before Wisconsin.
The Daily Bail? is that an online news site?
:) Best, most concise rebuttal to this nonsense that I've seen, yet!
Uh huh! Roberts' name is in there, bet the farm on it! One of the (many) reasons he rewrote Obamacare!
Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts,...Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party,...
Uh huh! Roberts' name is in there, bet the farm on it! One of the (many) reasons he rewrote Obamacare!
Thanks again Pookie for the link proving this is just lies.
MYTH DEBUNKED: Ted Cruz is NOT on a D.C Madams List, You Have Been LIED TO!
http://dcgazette.com/2016/myth-debinked-sorry-liberals-ted-cruz-not-d-c-madams-list-lied/
>>Yea Ted. Hide all those papers!
Campaign's whose consultants live in glass houses shouldn't throw.....
"In 1996, Stone resigned from a post as a volunteer spokesman in Senator Bob Dole's campaign for president after The National Enquirer wrote that Stone had placed ads and pictures in racy swingers publications and a website seeking sexual partners for himself and his second wife, Nydia Bertrane Stone,"
So the heir of the Drumpf brothel empire was introduced to [Nixon's dirty trixter] Stone by Cohn? WoW
http://www.google.com/#q=Trump+Cohn+Stone
Kinda puts that whole "cozying up to the establishment" meme in a whole new putrid light, don't it.
Yes. Ted is one of the sleaziest politicians I’ve seen in fifty years.
Thanks for reminding me.
http://www.google.com/#q=Cohn+Stone+Trump+Epstein
Quit the collection of insiders for someone pretending to be an outsider.
And yet, Trump’s mortgage bidness still failed...
Sure would be unfortunate if the list got hacked.
Imagine SCOTUS judges, candidates, Senators etc on there.
The powers at be would never want those names released.
Oh yeah, and that signature loan for Goldman Sachs...
You’re a load of information today.
Too bad it smacks your idiot in the face!
>>that signature loan for Goldman Sachs...
Asked and answered.
http://www.npr.org/2016/01/14/463093708/the-ted-cruz-goldman-sachs-loan-explained
Now, why did Trump’s Mortgage bidness FAIL; did someone not review his SBA application with sufficient vigor, or something?
You poor dear.
I’ll bet you can walk into Goldman Sachs any time you like and get a $100k signature loan.
You dumb asses don’t have a clue do you.
>>Ill bet you can walk into Goldman Sachs any time you like and get a $100k signature loan.
Wells Fargo gave me a 14000 credit card limit I didn’t even ask for (that I cancelled and never used) - and I’m just a “dumbass”.
I don’t see any reason why Goldman Sachs wouldn’t give Cruz a loan - there’s no evidence he’s a credit risk.
How much did Trump Mortage figure on loaning.. before it FAILED?
Yes, you’re a dumb ass.
Any other questions?
Oh by the way, would you folks support Trump more if his wife worked for the Council on Foreign Relations for five years?
How’s that North American Community coming anyway?
Has Heidi expressed her pleasure at how smoothly the slide into the North American Union is coming?
Gosh you guys have a pandora’s box of problems.
Curz can’t stop putting his feet in his mouth, and he has to have some of the most ignorant forum participants I’ve seen in 30 years.
{shrug}
It’s not like those lists of phone numbers aren’t already all over them inerweb thingees alGore invented.
That must be very exciting for whoever happens to be on the end of those numbers... assuming they’re still breathing.
>>Has Heidi expressed her pleasure at how
>>smoothly the slide into the North American Union is coming?
Why would she - What was her work-product in the CFR/NAFTA conspiracy?
One more subject you don’t know squat about.
She participated in the development of a document called “Developing a North American Community”.
As I said, not in 30 years have I seen more illiterate big-mouths on a forum.
Ok great.
What text in that document is she specifically responsible for?
Also, if there one person in that book who never sought or partook in the illicit activity, then the book itself cannot be trusted, and publication of such would ruin an innocent life, thereby validating the concern for public good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.