Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Classification is based on content, not markings."
1 posted on 03/11/2016 10:28:32 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: SueRae

IT guys know all.


2 posted on 03/11/2016 10:30:00 AM PST by fulltlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

The importance of this story is NOT in the information it provides about Clinton, which should be harmful to her; rather it is the fact that sources high in the FBI are happily leaking it. They’re putting down a marker....either Clinton gets indicted, or the whole story gets leaked...creating a huge problem for the DoJ


3 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:26 AM PST by ken5050 (Trump: "I'm no conservative, but I sure can play one on TV")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

After a thorough investigation the Obama “Justice” Department will clear Hillary of all allegations and attribute it all to a vast right wing conspiracy attempting to smear her good name.

Seriously, does anyone think that Hillary Clinton will get prosecuted when Lois Lerner was not?


4 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:34 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

...His importance to this case cannot be over-emphasized,...

Pretty damaging statement.


6 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:38 AM PST by WILLIALAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

7 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:39 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (So our choice will be either Trump or Clinton? I need a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

I’m sorry, I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t believe that that lying criminal Shillary is ever going to be prosecuted. They’ve had at least 20 years of various criminal acts upon which to put her azz under the jail, but here she is running for president.


8 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:51 AM PST by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae
...according to an intelligence source close to the case...

Who might perhaps be a Clinton operative. I seem to remember "sources close to the Starr investigation" suggesting all sorts of devastating things were coming, and that helped make Bill look relatively innocent when the actual charges were revealed.

11 posted on 03/11/2016 10:36:15 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

Bryan Pagliano.

There’s one guy I wouldn’t want to be right now.

He will sleep with one eye open the rest of his life and never be able to have a cat.


12 posted on 03/11/2016 10:36:19 AM PST by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

This guy better move out of the country on an assumed name.


18 posted on 03/11/2016 10:44:54 AM PST by wastedyears (uchikudake - toki michite - ikiru tame - tokihanate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

The defense will be, no matter how egregious the lawbreaking was -

that she SHOULD be able to do that because she’s Hillary Clinton.


25 posted on 03/11/2016 10:52:42 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

Knowing the Clinton’s like we do, would anyone here if they worked for them want to “tell all” even with immunity?


33 posted on 03/11/2016 11:00:49 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

Always keep that computer guy who built your under the radar server happy...

36 posted on 03/11/2016 11:05:09 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

Ho Hum.


37 posted on 03/11/2016 11:05:14 AM PST by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

FBI Investigation

39 posted on 03/11/2016 11:09:58 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

This is awesome to watch. Catherine Herridge is the best. It is now clear that she has a strong FBI source very close to this case. I suspect the FBI is using this tactic to keep obama and hillary honest. Of Course, we all know that her reference to “a security investigation” is another lie. Also this is an intimidation tool on hillary underlings who do not have the assurance of clemency that hillary has already obtained from obama. These people can go to prison if they don’t cooperate. “Devastating witness” was used by the leaker for a purpose to impute aggressive prosecution.
I am getting more optimistic that she may be exposed as a criminal whose conduct prohibits her from holding office. Trump will have a field day with her as a liar and a criminal.


41 posted on 03/11/2016 11:11:35 AM PST by WENDLE (Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

Was anyone doubting that Hillary’s emailing came from her phones?


43 posted on 03/11/2016 11:14:17 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae
This story has been out all day. The first source I read was some blog I'd never heard of. This is just a reprint of numerous other sites.

Of course, what good is a devastating witness, without a fearless honest prosecutor?

46 posted on 03/11/2016 11:18:48 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae
It would be great if for once a Clinton insider actually refused to go the mattresses with the family.

Imagine somewhere along the line if one of them just said, "Screw it! I don't even like these creeps. Give me witness protection and I'll tell you everything I know. With proof."

Maybe this guy is the one. Maybe Lucy won't move the football this time.

47 posted on 03/11/2016 11:18:52 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Carl Grimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

IF - BIG IF - this is true, they oughtta put him in witness protection. See “Danny Casolaro”.


58 posted on 03/11/2016 11:31:28 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

Obviously, Catherine Herridge has proved that she can be trusted to accurately report “just the facts” and nothing more.


66 posted on 03/11/2016 11:42:40 AM PST by onyx (You're here posting, so sign-up to DONATE MONTHLY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson