Posted on 03/11/2016 4:42:18 AM PST by chrisnj
Will the Dems let Cruz, born in Canada to a Cuban father, be Hillary's opponent in the General election?
Sorry, but the sad fact is that you do not have a good grasp of the subject matter. You are giving entirely too much importance to irrelevant and utterly inept court decisions, and entirely to little importance to the Framers’ intent.
They want Cruz so they can bring him down for non-eligibility.
You think Cruz is nbc. That is what you think. Many disagree. What is most important is whether the RATS think Cruz is nbc.
It is apparent that the Democrats, whether they think Cruz is nbc or not, will use this as a weapon against us. If Cruz is the nominee, they will challenge him.
Cruz, being a ‘Republican’, will not get help from the liberal judges/courts -
in Obama’s case, they delayed, hid behind ‘jurisdiction’ and ‘standing’ to avoid ruling, they made up laws or ignored laws to side with Obama.... simply dismissing lawsuits left and right without ever hearing the cases..... they even made up some arguments for obama when obama/his attorney did not appear in court as ordered...
This time a Republican is challenged, a Republican that they want to remove for the sake of their own RATS/party. So they will conduct hearing and rule on the merits - against Cruz, because he was born in Canada to a Cuban father! They can afford to rule this way without affecting obama’s case, because obama is allegedly born in Hawaii!
(so they say)
It is really that bad!!!
They will rule to please their RAT masters!
That is right! Cruz won’t get away with it like obama did!
Cruz supporters, put on your thinking caps, be engaged, don’t give them any gift that enable them to win again!
‘We are being set up by our own party for failure.’
Indeed!
The GOP made a pact with the RATS last time - the Repub won’t challenge obama if the RATS don’t challenge McCain. The GOP even made up a senate resolution to ‘resolve’ that McCain is nbc eligible to be POTUS!
This time they didn’t even bother to ‘resolve’ that Cruz is nbc! Because they would be contradicting their own senate Resolution 511 in 2008.
“Sorry, but the sad fact is that you do not have a good grasp of the subject matter. You are giving entirely too much importance to irrelevant and utterly inept court decisions, and entirely to little importance to the Framers’ intent.
No, the sad fact is that every time you are confronted with Constitutional clauses, Federal statutes, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Acts, and U.S. Supreme Court case law that explicitly and in plain language say Ted Cruz is a naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen; you pull a Hillary Clinton stunt and flat out lie in defiance of the incontrovertible evidence to the contrary. Of course, it is perhaps only fitting that Lying Ted Cruz should attract Lying Supporters to his campaign as well. Unfortunately for your lies, the U.S. Supreme Court statement correctly observed: United State v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....” Ted Cruz is “a person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States,” and he “can only become a citizen by being naturalized” just as the U.S. Supreme Court observed. Before 1922 Ted Cruz would have been born without any U.S. citizenship at all, natural born citizenship or natural born citizenship, because the law authorizing NATURALIZED CITIZENSHIP only for a child born abroad with only one U.S. citizen mother did not yet exist in any form whatsoever. Consequently, his present illegal Presidential campaign is unlawfully dividing the Republican voters in the face of a threat by the Democrats to fundamentally change the membership of the U.S. Supreme Court for one or more lifetimes in ways that will destroy the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Still, you persist in falsely pretending naturalization laws have some magical ability to make a child born abroad into a natural born citizen just because the child has a U.S. citizen parent, even though two U.S. citizen parents formerly was not enough to qualify such a child born abroad with any form of U.S. citizenship for most of the early history of the United States, until laws naturalizing such children were enacted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.