Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

Sorry, but the sad fact is that you do not have a good grasp of the subject matter. You are giving entirely too much importance to irrelevant and utterly inept court decisions, and entirely to little importance to the Framers’ intent.


81 posted on 03/11/2016 2:31:03 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine

“Sorry, but the sad fact is that you do not have a good grasp of the subject matter. You are giving entirely too much importance to irrelevant and utterly inept court decisions, and entirely to little importance to the Framers’ intent.

No, the sad fact is that every time you are confronted with Constitutional clauses, Federal statutes, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Acts, and U.S. Supreme Court case law that explicitly and in plain language say Ted Cruz is a naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen; you pull a Hillary Clinton stunt and flat out lie in defiance of the incontrovertible evidence to the contrary. Of course, it is perhaps only fitting that Lying Ted Cruz should attract Lying Supporters to his campaign as well. Unfortunately for your lies, the U.S. Supreme Court statement correctly observed: United State v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....” Ted Cruz is “a person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States,” and he “can only become a citizen by being naturalized” just as the U.S. Supreme Court observed. Before 1922 Ted Cruz would have been born without any U.S. citizenship at all, natural born citizenship or natural born citizenship, because the law authorizing NATURALIZED CITIZENSHIP only for a child born abroad with only one U.S. citizen mother did not yet exist in any form whatsoever. Consequently, his present illegal Presidential campaign is unlawfully dividing the Republican voters in the face of a threat by the Democrats to fundamentally change the membership of the U.S. Supreme Court for one or more lifetimes in ways that will destroy the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Still, you persist in falsely pretending naturalization laws have some magical ability to make a child born abroad into a natural born citizen just because the child has a U.S. citizen parent, even though two U.S. citizen parents formerly was not enough to qualify such a child born abroad with any form of U.S. citizenship for most of the early history of the United States, until laws naturalizing such children were enacted.


86 posted on 03/11/2016 5:48:51 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson