Posted on 03/05/2016 1:48:48 PM PST by Sub-Driver
The Right to Sue the Gun Industry
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD MARCH 4, 2016
The world recoiled in horror in 2012 when 20 Connecticut schoolchildren and six adults were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School by a deranged teenager using a military-style assault rifle to fire 154 rounds in less than five minutes. The weapon was a Bushmaster AR-15 semiautomatic rifle adapted from its original role as a battlefield weapon. The AR-15, which is designed to inflict maximum casualties with rapid bursts, should never have been available for purchase by civilians.
This is the eminently reasonable point that the parents of the 6- and 7-year-old students cut down at the school are now pressing in Connecticut state court. They are attempting to sue the gun manufacturer, Remington; the wholesaler; and a local retailer for recklessness in providing the weapon to the consumer marketplace “with no conceivable use for it other than the mass killing of other human beings.”
The question of whether the lawsuit will be allowed to proceed is at issue because Congress, prodded by the gun lobby, in 2005 foolishly granted the gun industry nearly complete immunity from legal claims and damages from the criminal use of guns.
The Sandy Hook parents argue that their suit should continue because that law, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, allows claims against companies — gun shop dealers, for example — if they knew or should have known that the weapons they sold were likely to risk injury to others. The parents contend that the maker of the Bushmaster is no less culpable because it knowingly marketed a risky war weapon to civilians.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
So is the NY Times.
“The parents contend that the maker of the Bushmaster is no less culpable because it knowingly marketed a risky war weapon to civilians.”
Apple beware...this may become a precedent!
We should then have a right to sue 0bama’s Volkische Beobachter..
If you sue the gun industry you better sue the auto industry the knife industry, the bat industry, the rope industry and how about those illegal drugs that all the hypocrites in Washington are secretly invested in that is killing our children on the streets? Should we sue the politicians?
I believe everyone else there was obeying the rules & laws rendering them impotent against the attacker, who being bent on mass murder would not have been stopped by lack of an assault weapon. The two largest mass murders in U.S. history were perpetrated without firearms (one with fertilizer & diesel, the other with a gallon of gasoline).
Nah. It’s just a fake newspaper using a fake event...
...and for those of you ready to vote against Trump on ‘principle’, keep in mind that it just takes ONE (key) COURT RULING to shut down the firearms industry....and then one more ruling and gun owners will be LIABLE any time they fire at another person.
But I know, Trump defends Planned Parenthood...so I guess the Second Amendment isn’t that big a deal, to some.
Maybe we should , each of us, just sue ourselves.
Then lets sue the car industry every time there is a crash.
Cars are 4-6000 pound machines that easily,kill people, and do.
Lets sue cutlery makers every time people areminjured by their knives. I am talking about dinnerware makers, those knives are just as deadly and are used in fights and aggression.
Lets sue contraceptive makers every time an unintended pregnancy comes about.
See personal responsibility means nothing. Using the product wrong means nothing. Oh, wait, mr libtard, only when it comes to guns and other products you despise? (rhetorical, not at the poster)
How often could the parents say that "The maker of the (insert name of vehicle here) is no less culpable because it knowingly marketed a (fill in vehicle weight) pound instrument of death and destruction to people who might operate it in an altered state of consciousness or while distracted."
Pretty soon we're going to be suing the guy who sold the fertilizer to the farmer who grew the corn the distiller made into the whiskey the driver consumed before getting in a wreck, too.
The responsibility has to lie on the person who did the deed, not the people who abused a tool to commit a crime..
I heard or saw somewhere, that the Bushmaster was in the car trunk and he only used pistols????
Sorry, Bob, I’m more in favor of a guy who has been for the RKBA all along and who never supported an ‘assault weapons ban’.
People die when the press lies. Maybe we should make it easier to sue the NYTs. And not just libel laws. How about class action suits for any lies?
This editorial just sold another 10,000 AR15s.
So the NYT believes in suing companies whose products worked exactly as they were designed? The gun did everything right. Why should it be blamed?
Take the judge to any given shooting range on any given Saturday, and count the AR-15s there that aren't murdering anyone.
I’d respect that if he were serving some other purpose than throwing the nomination process into a brokered convention...leaving us with Romney, Linda, or Jeb - who DON’T HAVE A PRAYER at winning.
The AR-15, which is designed to inflict maximum casualties with rapid bursts... pure bullshit from liberal assholes. I doubt the NYT even knows which end the projectile departs from.
I believe that we should reform the libel and slander laws to give citizens the right to sue newspapers and journalist for unlimited damages if they print any falsehood or false information about persons or property.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.