Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh Goes Full Nutter - The Most Illogical Pretzel Argument Ever Presented
The Conservative Treehouse ^
| 2-25-2016
| sundance
Posted on 02/25/2016 7:06:19 AM PST by smoothsailing
I know from the comments section many people have discussed how bizarre the recent ravings of Rush Limbaugh have become. However, I had not spent time listening to them, until this happened.
As far as I can tell this was actually broadcast by Rush Limbaugh yesterday. To say he’s contracted a viral strain of election cycle cognitive dissonance would be a severe understatement. Listen to this logic:
I know from the comments section many people have discussed how bizarre the recent ravings of Rush Limbaugh have become. However, I had not spent time listening to them, until this happened.
As far as I can tell this was actually broadcast by Rush Limbaugh yesterday. To say he’s contracted a viral strain of election cycle cognitive dissonance would be a severe understatement. Listen to this logic:
If Ted Cruz wants to win he’s got to focus exclusively on attacking Trump. Why? Because Cruz has to realize Marco Rubio is not going to drop out. If Rubio is not going to drop out, Rubio is not the obstacle – Trump is…
See if you can follow this logic. Marco Rubio is not going to leave the race, therefore it is the better course to attack the stronger frontrunner because, well, according to the Limbaugh logic, Trump winning in all the contests must mean he is positioned to leave the race – or something.
Seriously, this is what Rush Limbaugh is presenting to his audience. This makes absolutely ZERO sense. This is completely nonsensical. This is epic level moonbattery.
What makes Limbaugh think Donald Trump, a candidate who has won three consecutive resounding victories, is less disposed to staying in the presidential race than a freshman senator who has won absolutely no primary contests?
…And if Trump is no less committed to exit, then how does it make more sense to spend time trying to eliminate the stronger of the two candidate options?
We have heard rumors there are times when ineffective “gaslighting” can lead to absolutely insane expressions of logic. It would appear this rumor is profoundly true.
People pay this guy to hear this stuff?
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 241-242 next last
To: Fantasywriter
To my knowledge he did not....and don’t call me Shirley.
To: Fantasywriter
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/10/17/im-going-to-say-something-nice-about-jeb-bush/
...Iowa and New Hampshire is less predictive of campaign intent because all candidates HAVE TO make an impression to keep up appearances. However, even there, the real action is only within Team Trump and Team Jeb with Carson, Cruz and Fiorina doing the next closest effort...
...actually only Trump and Bush, have active efforts underway in every state to meet the qualification efforts for ballot placement...
122
posted on
02/25/2016 8:37:00 AM PST
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: Fantasywriter
“The naked, unbridled malice toward him is, frankly, sickening.”
As is his malice toward anyone who is not Trump. So I guess it’s a wash.
123
posted on
02/25/2016 8:39:17 AM PST
by
jstaff
To: TTFlyer
:: If Limbaugh doesnât savage Romney for his scurrilous attack on Trumpâs income taxes on his show today then Limbaugh will be revealed as a GOPe hack and a fraud ::
Whoa!
When did Romney get back in the campaign fray? (AKA: This is a frivolous argument. Seriesly.)
124
posted on
02/25/2016 8:39:50 AM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
To: Fantasywriter
Sundance was Darren Wilson's staunchest supporter. If he believes that Dorian Johnson assaulted officer Darren Wilson and it was covered up, then he believes that Darren Wilson committed perjury. Sundance is a flaming moron.
To: smoothsailing
Can we call him Sundunce now
126
posted on
02/25/2016 8:40:27 AM PST
by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: Fantasywriter
“So you DID get that info from a hate-Sundance site?”
So you honestly believe there is a site out there who’s sole purpose is to hate on “sundance”? Seems a bit out there.
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
“Trump appears to peg his legacy on protecting our borders and building employment from within.”
Trump suits are made in Mexico and Trump ties are (were?) made in Red China.
Trump could move production to America and create jobs here. That would be a start.
The problem is: he has not done that. And he will not do that.
To: Durbin
129
posted on
02/25/2016 8:43:31 AM PST
by
US_MilitaryRules
(The last suit you wear has no pockets!)
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Very dishonest. Accuse Sundance of something he never said, and then call him a dunce for believing what he doesn’t believe.
130
posted on
02/25/2016 8:43:42 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: To Hell With Poverty
Who said the Trumpanzees climbing the Conservative Treehouse could read?
131
posted on
02/25/2016 8:47:07 AM PST
by
ConservingFreedom
(Trump fans:'he's no more conservative than Mitt'-www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3389209/posts)
To: jjotto
I read your entire excerpt, very carefully, twice. I could not find the following quotes;
‘Sundance boldly claimed that Jeb was the only candidate who could mount a challenge to Trump, and that Jeb’s non-existent Iowa ground game was “where the action is”.’
132
posted on
02/25/2016 8:47:47 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
You pays your money and you takes your choices.
133
posted on
02/25/2016 8:49:00 AM PST
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: DJ MacWoW
More demeaning. You just can’t answer a question, can you?
Very un-conservative of you.
To: traderrob6
Perhaps you have a link to the site on which the accusation was made? So far, no link forthcoming.
135
posted on
02/25/2016 8:49:25 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: jstaff
You and I are using the word ‘malice’ in one-hundred percent different ways.
136
posted on
02/25/2016 8:50:52 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: traderrob6
So according to you, Rush read the article without giving his listeners even a hint as to WHY he was reading it?
Do you even believe that yourself?
137
posted on
02/25/2016 8:52:50 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Political Junkie Too
.
Cruz happens to be the only candidate qualified to be president, and you want him to drop out?
Have we not been through this nonsense in the past half dozen presidential elections?
Has it come out well?
Will water run up hill?
.
138
posted on
02/25/2016 8:53:03 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: Fantasywriter
That wasn’t my contention so feel no obligation to justify it.
To: traderrob6
If you’re not a career politician/lawyer, you should be. You have the gift of DC-speak. I.e.: you take forever to say nothing of relevance..
140
posted on
02/25/2016 8:58:13 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 241-242 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson